Course Title: Financial Technology Introduction to FinTech FI 491/891, Spring 2025
Instructor: Caroline Genc
Session for students to introduce themselves to each other.
Origin: From Paris to Michigan
Education: Ph.D. in Finance from Paris Dauphine PSL (2023)
Institution: Joined Michigan State University (MSU) this summer
Research Interests: Entrepreneurial finance, venture capital, behavioral finance, and a new focus on FinTech
Contact: genccaro@msu.edu for questions.
Expectations from students: Discuss backgrounds, main interests, future career plans, and any programming experience.
FinTech Perspective: What does FinTech mean personally to students? Identify any known financial technologies.
Syllabus Overview
Evaluation Components:
Participation: 10%
Quizzes: 30%
Mini Cases: 30%
Group Project: 30%
Attendance: Expected from all students.
Project Focus: FinTech Case Presentation on a specific topic within FinTech
Group Formation: Group of 3 (or 2 depending on size)
Timeline: Form groups by 2/3/2025, case must be approved before starting work.
Presentation: Planned for last 2 weeks of the course (about 13 minutes per group).
General Focus: Overview and definitions of FinTech.
FinTech: Currently, no universally agreed-upon definition.
In this class, it refers to technology-enabled innovation in financial services:
Defined by the Financial Stability Board as involving new business models or processes affecting financial markets and institutions.
FinTech applies to companies that use technology to:
Improve or innovate existing financial products (e.g., savings, borrowing).
Make financial services more efficient and accessible.
General consensus emphasizes:
Technology-driven nature of FinTech.
Its role in improving, automating, and innovating financial services.
Key technologies in FinTech include:
Cloud computing, APIs, AI, Machine Learning, Robotic Process Automation, Blockchain.
Examples of FinTech applications include:
Payments: PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, Stripe.
Personal Finance Apps: Mint, YNAB, Simplifi.
Robo-Advisors: Betterment, Wealthfront, Vanguard Personal Advisor Services.
Peer-to-Peer Lending: Prosper, LendingClub, Upstart.
Investment/Crypto Apps: Robinhood, Coinbase.
Insurtech (out of scope): Lemonade, Oscar Health.
Modules covered:
APIs, Banking Platforms, User Experience.
AI & ML.
Blockchain Technology & DeFi.
Smart Contracts & DApps.
Crypto Assets.
Payment Systems.
Credit and Lending.
Capital Markets & Trading.
Risks, Regulations, Future of FinTech.
Investment rose significantly from 2010 to 2019 peaking at $216.8 billion.
Americas attracted over half of the total global investment in FinTech.
Americas lead with over 13,000 FinTechs as of January 2024, establishing it as a global hub.
Roots: Growth in electronic banking in the late 20th century (1970s-1980s).
Evolution: Dynamic changes in the fintech sector.
Traditional financial services provided by physical banks, with no major technological innovations.
Emergence of ATMs in 1967 and credit card networks.
Key Innovations:
Online banking (Bank of America 1994, Wells Fargo 1995).
E-commerce growth (Amazon 1994, PayPal 1998).
Rise of P2P lending platforms.
Boom: Growth in digital currencies, crowdfunding platforms, fintech startups, and CBDCs.
Pandemic accelerated digital transformation in finance.
Main drivers leading to FinTech boom:
Economic and regulatory changes.
Technological evolution.
Shifts in customer expectations.
Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Global Financial Crisis (GFC) as a catalyst for fintech growth:
Erosion of public trust in traditional banks and regulations enabling startups.
Continued low interest rates post-crisis shifted funding into fintech ventures, spurring growth.
Talent Shift: Financial sector layoffs fuels talent acquisition for fintech. Increased innovation due to availability of experienced professionals.
Rapid technology advancements affecting productivity and business dynamics over 50 years.
Resulted in greater computational power, altering the business landscape.
Key areas of technological progress include:
Data collection, digital connectivity, and the cloud.
Importance: Shift from internal servers to external cloud solutions reduces costs vastly for businesses.
Efficiency: Allowing companies to adjust IT infrastructure to match variable user needs and activity.
Cloud solutions opened access to powerful computing resources crucial for fintech startups with reduced initial investments.
Consumer readiness for technology adoption stems from experiences with non-financial digital offerings that shape expectations for personalized services.
Disruptors:
Startups: Innovation and disruption.
Big Finance and Big Tech: Players in the FinTech arena.
Government bodies: Regulation and facilitation of innovation.
Difficulty in acquiring specialized talent due to competition from established tech and financial firms.
Building consumer trust and managing regulatory concerns noted as significant hurdles for fintech companies.
Navigating complex regulatory processes while raising capital can slow growth for fintech startups.
Variations in financial regulations complicate market entry and startup operations, leading to increased compliance costs.
An approach to foster innovation by allowing startups to test their products in controlled environments with less regulatory pressure.
Response Strategies:
Transform, partner, or acquire fintech to stay competitive.
Analysis Focus: Examine case emergence, financial relevance, performance analysis, opportunities, risks, and interactive components for presentations.
Expectation of group presentations to cover key analyses, technology insights, and include audience engagement quizzes on findings.
Founders: Taavet Hinrikus and Kristo Käärmann
Kristo's expensive money transfer experience led him to collaborate with Taavet for a more efficient currency exchange solution.
Traditional international money transfer services suffer from high fees, lack of transparency, and slow processing times.
Operational Model: Utilizes P2P for cost-effective transfers aligned with real exchange rates, ensuring transparency and low fees.
Wise's operational efficiency by ensuring internal transfers minimize cross-border transactions, enhancing speed and cost-efficiency.
Early funding from personal savings, followed by securing investments in 2012; rebranding to Wise reflects expanded services.
Market disruption, user-centric services, cost-effective methods, expansive offerings, and regulatory compliance contribute to Wise's achievements.
Potential regulatory challenges and the need to maintain user trust and competition in the burgeoning financial landscape.
Wise's rise catalyzed competition among traditional banks leading to broader fintech acceptance and innovation.
Recommended readings for further insights include works by Arslanian and Fischer (2019) and materials from Wise's annual reports.