Exam - 220221
Question 1: Project Crashing
- Objective: Determine the cost to shorten a project by 5 days.
- Critical Path: Identify the critical path (CP) to determine project duration.
- Crashing Process:
- Shorten activities on the critical path with the lowest crashing cost per day, provided they haven't reached their shortest possible duration.
- If multiple activities have the same crashing cost, shorten the earlier one.
- Check if the critical path changes after each reduction.
- Stop after achieving the desired reduction (5 days).
- Example:
- Original CP = A-E-F-G-H-J = 27 days
- Crashing Sequence: A(1)-J(1)-F(2)-H(1)
- Total Crashing Cost = 5000 SEK
Question 2: Earned Value Analysis (EVA)
- Objective: Calculate project performance indicators and estimate final costs using EVA.
- Given Data:
- Accumulated PV = 1000 KSEK
- Accumulated EV = 800 KSEK
- Accumulated AC = 1150 KSEK
- Original Budget = 1600 KSEK
- Calculations:
- Schedule Variance (SV) = EV - PV = 800 - 1000 = -200 KSEK
- Cost Variance (CV) = EV - AC = 800 - 1150 = -350 KSEK
- Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV/AC = 800/1150 = 0.7
- Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV/PV = 800/1000 = 0.8
- Estimated Total Project Costs = AC + (Original Budget - EV)/CPI = 1150 + (1600 - 800)/0.7 = 2300 KSEK
- Interpretation:
- The project is underperforming in both time and schedule.
- Expected final costs: 2300 KSEK instead of 1600 KSEK.
Question 3: Payback Method
- Objective: Prioritize projects based on the payback period.
- Project 1 (ERP System):
- Total Investment = 7 (development) + 4 (implementation) + 3 (compensation) = 14 MSEK
- Annual Net Cash Flow = 5 (savings) - 1 (IT support) = 4 MSEK
- Payback Period = 14/4 = 3.5 years
- Project 2 (New Equipment):
- Total Investment = 15 (equipment) + 5 (shutdown loss) = 20 MSEK
- Annual Net Cash Flow = 5 MSEK
- Payback Period = 20/5 = 4 years
- Decision:
- Prioritize Project 1 due to the shorter payback period.
Question 4: Benefits Management Approaches
- Instrumental Approach:
- Rational perspective, objective process.
- Focuses on measurability, evaluation, organizational change, and performance.
- Assumes proper implementation leads to benefits.
- May use rigid frameworks.
- Neglects social and political dimensions.
- Social Approach:
- Questions linearity and rationality.
- Dynamic, non-linear; involves stakeholders.
- Focuses on subjective dimensions, emotions, and actors' characteristics.
- Benefits are multidimensional and multileveled.
- Benefits are socially constructed.