Article: "Managing Oneself" by Peter F. Drucker, originally in Harvard Business Review (January 2005)
Drucker (born 1909, died 2005), often called the founder of modern management, introduced concepts like Management by Objectives.
Premise: In the knowledge economy, career success depends on self-management rather than external direction.
Classic examples of self-managers: Napoléon, da Vinci, Mozart (historical “outliers”).
Today, even those with "modest endowments" must learn similar disciplines.
Practical drivers
Typical working life now spans about 50 years; staying mentally alert requires periodic change.
The Imperative to Know Your Strengths
People usually misjudge what they are good at; many only know (inaccurately) what they are not good at.
Rationale
In a world of choice (unlike the hereditary vocations of earlier centuries), we must locate roles where we can contribute.
Performance can only be built on strengths, not on weaknesses.
Feedback Analysis (Primary Tool)
Steps
Whenever you make a key decision or take a key action, write down the expected result.
After 9–12 months, compare expectations with actual outcomes.
Origins & Provenance
Invented in the 14^{th} century by an obscure German theologian; later adopted independently by John Calvin & Ignatius of Loyola.
Their orders (Calvinist Church, Jesuits) dominated Europe within 30 years—testament to the method’s power.
Drucker’s personal discoveries
Unexpected intuitive rapport with technical people (engineers, accountants, market researchers).
Lesser resonance with generalists.
Timeline for insight: Consistent practice reveals dominant strengths in 2–3 years.
Action Implications
Concentrate energy where strengths deliver results.
Improve strengths
Identify missing skills/knowledge; most gaps are “fillable” (e.g., anyone can learn trigonometry though mathematicians are born).
Overcome “intellectual arrogance”
Specialists often disdain other fields (e.g., engineers dismiss HR; HR dismisses accounting). This is self-defeating.
Remedy bad habits & manners
Example: Brilliant planner who never executes—must learn follow-through, delegation, adaptation.
Courtesy lubricates organizations (“please,” “thank you,” names, personal interest). Lack of manners = recurrent project failure once cooperation is needed.
Focus resources on elevating competent to star performers, not mediocre to average.
How Do I Perform?
Performance style is largely fixed (nature & early nurture) long before work life.
Key diagnostics:
Reader vs Listener
Rarely both.
Case studies
Dwight Eisenhower
As Supreme Commander: Received questions in writing → clear, polished answers.
As U.S. President: Took oral questions like predecessors Roosevelt & Truman (listeners) → rambling, incoherent responses; press contempt.
Lyndon Johnson
A listener who inherited JFK’s writer-centric staff → read memos he couldn’t process → presidency hindered.
Lesson: Readers forced to listen (or vice versa) under-perform.
Learning Styles (≈ half-dozen varieties)
Learn by writing (e.g., Winston Churchill; poor academic marks, excelled via writing).
Learn by note-taking (e.g., Beethoven’s sketchbooks ensured memory retention).
Learn by doing.
Learn by talking
Example: CEO who weekly talked at staff for 2–3 hours, arguing multiple sides; he learned aloud.
Self-knowledge is common; acting on it is rare yet essential.
Interpersonal Work Modes
Work well with people or as loner?
If with people, in what relationship?
Best as subordinate (e.g., General George Patton—superb subordinate, disastrous independent commander).
Best as team member or coach/mentor.
Decision-maker vs Adviser
Number-two advisers often fail when promoted to number-one decision roles.
Other situational questions
Thrive under stress or in predictable structure?
Prefer large or small organization?
Guideline: Don’t try to change basic nature; refine how you perform and refuse assignments misaligned with your mode.
Values
Distinct from ethics (which are universal). Drucker’s "mirror test": “What kind of person do I want to see in the mirror each morning?”
Example: German ambassador resigned 1906 rather than host morally objectionable dinner for Edward VII.
Compatibility Principle
HR executive who favored internal promotion joined firm that prioritized external hires (“fresh blood”). Value clash → frustration → resignation (financial loss accepted).
Pharmaceutical strategies: incremental improvement vs high-risk breakthroughs—driven by value systems, not economics.
Short-term vs long-term management focus equally value-based.
Organizational & personal values must be close enough to coexist; otherwise, non-performance and frustration follow.
Sometimes strengths conflict with values; values should prevail (Drucker left lucrative investment banking in 1930s to pursue people-centric work).
Where Do I Belong?
Few (e.g., mathematicians, musicians, cooks) know very early. Most discover in late 20s.
After clarifying Strengths, Performance Style, Values, decide where you do NOT belong.
Decline roles in mis-fitting environments (e.g., big orgs, decision-centric posts).
When accepting opportunities, specify structure, relationships, timeframe, and expected results that suit “who I am.”
Careers evolve from preparedness meeting opportunity—not elaborate planning.
What Should I Contribute?
New question for knowledge workers: “What should my contribution be?”
Assess what the situation requires.
Given strengths/performance/values, where can I add most?
What results are needed to “make a difference” (visible & preferably measurable)?
Planning horizon: typically 18 months.
Goals should be challenging yet attainable (“stretch”), meaningful, and difference-making.
Hospital example: Administrator set standard—every ER patient seen by qualified nurse within 60 seconds → Model ER in 12 months; transformed entire hospital within 2 years.
Responsibility for Relationships
Most work involves others; effectiveness requires relationship management.
Part 1 – Accept Individuality
Coworkers possess unique strengths, work modes, and values.
Adapt to bosses’ styles (reader vs listener, etc.) to avoid mis-labeling as incompetent.
Part 2 – Take Responsibility for Communication
Personality conflicts often stem from ignorance about others’ tasks, methods, and expected results.
Knowledge workers must educate others and request reciprocal disclosure:
Share: strengths, work style, values, intended contributions, expected outcomes.
Ask the same of colleagues, superiors, subordinates, team members.
Universal reaction to such openness: “This is helpful—why didn’t you say so earlier?”
Organizations run on trust, built through mutual understanding.
The Second Half of Your Life
Manual-labor past: simply work until physical limit, then retire.
Knowledge workers reach competence peak around 45, risk boredom for next 20–25 years.