Unit 5: Civil War and Reconstruction
Economics ↴
North
More population
More factories
More railroads
More money
South
Agriculturally oriented (Cash crops: tobacco, cotton, indigo, race)
More cotton
Civil War ↴
Slavery compromises (to have a political balance):
Missouri Compromise (1820)
Missouri is a free state and Maine is a free state
The 36 ‘ 60 line (half of the country)
Since it was very shortsighted It was a quick fix making it did not fix the root problem
Kansas-Nebraska Act
California was considered a free state
The slave trade was allowed in the district of Colombia (DC), but slavery was not allowed
New Mexico and Utah were given Popular Sovereignty (people can choose) - both chose to be slave states
Bleeding Kansas
violence was sustained
overwhelming shift between Kansas being a slave state or a free state
Kansas ended up being a free state
States vs federal rights:
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott had been born a slave under a family and later purchased by John Emerson who he later married Irene Sanford. After the death of John Emerson, Scott tried to purchase his freedom from Irene Sanford but was denied, causing him to sue the woman due to the fact he had lived in a free state according to the Missouri Compromise. The first decision made by the lower court was that there was a lack of detail on Scott’s side, causing him to lose the case. He later went to the Supreme Court of Missouri where the full verdict was that he had the right to be emaciated. Another case took place there and the court ruled with Irene Sanford. The Supreme Court decided that since Scott was a slave, he was not considered a U.S. citizen and hence had no right to bring the case to the Supreme Court.
Harpers Ferry raid
The leader was John Brown
The plan was to make the enslaved in the area free from their owners. Brown was successfully able to bail several slaves but was later captured as his actions were considered treason and brought more intense feelings between the South and North leading to the Civil War making his plan fail.
John Brown was hanged after he was found guilty
Lincoln and the Election of 1860
Lincoln won; anti-slavery
Sparked the secession (Confederates States of America - where South Carolina was the first to leave)
The government had more influence
Lincondepsied the idea of secession
The first shots of the Civil War were by the Confederate troops on Fort Sumter in South Carolina’s Charleston Harbor.
Reconstruction↴
The period where the United States made policies to rebuild the South and integrate new free African Americans after the Civil War
13th Amendment
Ends slavery
14th Amendment
Granted citizenship
Equal protection of the laws
15th Amendment
Granted voting rights to all African American males
The US military was sent to enforce these rights in the south
Freedmen’s Bureau
US government agency that helped provide basic education for free slaves and created schools
Provided food and Medical Care and land to farm
Economic control
Owning land was a symbol of freedom
Sharecropping: allowed freedmen to rent land from their former Masters by paying with crops. employers also provided seeds and tools.
Tenant farming: Involving farmer slaves renting land from landowners to grow crops
Ku Klux Klan (KKK)
A hate group towards the reconstruction controlled by white power in the south
Attacked politicians that wanted to continue the reconstruction
Post - Reconstruction↴
Violence in the South could not be stopped the Army was sent to control it
Many were dissatisfied that the Army had to act like a police
The North became tired of it as South violence grew
1876 - A compromise made during the presidential election
The Republican candidate won which resulted in removing the military from the South which ended all protections for African Americans.
The South becomes the same as before the Reconstruction leading to the Jim Crow Era: Legal Segregation
Jim Crow Era: Legal Segregation↴
Southerners were afraid that black people would take over political power so racial segregation in public places
Dance that mocked people
Tax tests and other tests were made to test the intelligence of black people (they made it purposefully harder)
Plessy v. Ferguson → The Supreme Court decided that segregating races is okay as long as the separate facilities are of equal quality - “Separate but Equal”
NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) → to ensure the political, and educational, equality of minority group citizens of States and eliminate racial prejudice
Charles Hamilton Houston → First special counsel for the NAACP
Brown v. Board of Education → Separating children in public schools based on race was unconstitutional
Thurgood Marshall → Civil rights lawyer who used the courts to fight the Brown v. Board of Education
Civil Rights Act of 1964 → Bans segregation and discrimination in all public facilities
Voting↴
Grandfather Clause → “If your grandfather voted, you can vote”
Literacy test → Exam for assessing a person's ability to read and write
24th Amendment → Bans poll taxes (a tax that must be paid to vote)
Voting Rights Act (1965) → Bars literacy tests and the federal government will not enforce equal voting rights
Affirmative action↴
Types of Segregation:
De Jure (in jury)
Most common in the south
Separation of races is required by government laws
De Facto (in fact)
Separation of races is not required by law
Cause by personal prejudice, customs, and choices that individuals and families make
Affirmative action:
improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society.
employment and education.
equal access to education for those groups that have been historically excluded or underrepresented, such as women and minorities.
Controversy surrounding the constitutionality of affirmative action programs has made the topic one of heated debate.
Cases:
California v. Bakke
Alan Bakke was a white student who had been denied admission twice to the medical school of the University of California
He had better grades the some minority students who were accepted to the school
He felt his 14th Amendment rights were violated
Quota - a certain percentage of minorities who must be admitted
Reverse Discrimination - discrimination that targets white people as the victim
Verdict: affirmative action is constitutional, but racial quotas are not
Gratz. V. Bollinger
To be accepted at the University of Michigan, a student had to score 100 points on the admission scale
Jennifer Gratz was a white woman who was denied admission
She claimed her 14th Amendment rights were violated
In Michigan's admission policy, certain minority groups earned bonus points in the admission process
Verdict: Gratz; her First Amendment rights were violated
Harvard Admission Policy
Asian Americans felt their rights were being violated
Harvard's use of the 'personal score' unfairly improved Black and Hispanic students chances of admission
Verdict: Harvard's admissions policy was acceptable
Economics ↴
North
More population
More factories
More railroads
More money
South
Agriculturally oriented (Cash crops: tobacco, cotton, indigo, race)
More cotton
Civil War ↴
Slavery compromises (to have a political balance):
Missouri Compromise (1820)
Missouri is a free state and Maine is a free state
The 36 ‘ 60 line (half of the country)
Since it was very shortsighted It was a quick fix making it did not fix the root problem
Kansas-Nebraska Act
California was considered a free state
The slave trade was allowed in the district of Colombia (DC), but slavery was not allowed
New Mexico and Utah were given Popular Sovereignty (people can choose) - both chose to be slave states
Bleeding Kansas
violence was sustained
overwhelming shift between Kansas being a slave state or a free state
Kansas ended up being a free state
States vs federal rights:
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott had been born a slave under a family and later purchased by John Emerson who he later married Irene Sanford. After the death of John Emerson, Scott tried to purchase his freedom from Irene Sanford but was denied, causing him to sue the woman due to the fact he had lived in a free state according to the Missouri Compromise. The first decision made by the lower court was that there was a lack of detail on Scott’s side, causing him to lose the case. He later went to the Supreme Court of Missouri where the full verdict was that he had the right to be emaciated. Another case took place there and the court ruled with Irene Sanford. The Supreme Court decided that since Scott was a slave, he was not considered a U.S. citizen and hence had no right to bring the case to the Supreme Court.
Harpers Ferry raid
The leader was John Brown
The plan was to make the enslaved in the area free from their owners. Brown was successfully able to bail several slaves but was later captured as his actions were considered treason and brought more intense feelings between the South and North leading to the Civil War making his plan fail.
John Brown was hanged after he was found guilty
Lincoln and the Election of 1860
Lincoln won; anti-slavery
Sparked the secession (Confederates States of America - where South Carolina was the first to leave)
The government had more influence
Lincondepsied the idea of secession
The first shots of the Civil War were by the Confederate troops on Fort Sumter in South Carolina’s Charleston Harbor.
Reconstruction↴
The period where the United States made policies to rebuild the South and integrate new free African Americans after the Civil War
13th Amendment
Ends slavery
14th Amendment
Granted citizenship
Equal protection of the laws
15th Amendment
Granted voting rights to all African American males
The US military was sent to enforce these rights in the south
Freedmen’s Bureau
US government agency that helped provide basic education for free slaves and created schools
Provided food and Medical Care and land to farm
Economic control
Owning land was a symbol of freedom
Sharecropping: allowed freedmen to rent land from their former Masters by paying with crops. employers also provided seeds and tools.
Tenant farming: Involving farmer slaves renting land from landowners to grow crops
Ku Klux Klan (KKK)
A hate group towards the reconstruction controlled by white power in the south
Attacked politicians that wanted to continue the reconstruction
Post - Reconstruction↴
Violence in the South could not be stopped the Army was sent to control it
Many were dissatisfied that the Army had to act like a police
The North became tired of it as South violence grew
1876 - A compromise made during the presidential election
The Republican candidate won which resulted in removing the military from the South which ended all protections for African Americans.
The South becomes the same as before the Reconstruction leading to the Jim Crow Era: Legal Segregation
Jim Crow Era: Legal Segregation↴
Southerners were afraid that black people would take over political power so racial segregation in public places
Dance that mocked people
Tax tests and other tests were made to test the intelligence of black people (they made it purposefully harder)
Plessy v. Ferguson → The Supreme Court decided that segregating races is okay as long as the separate facilities are of equal quality - “Separate but Equal”
NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) → to ensure the political, and educational, equality of minority group citizens of States and eliminate racial prejudice
Charles Hamilton Houston → First special counsel for the NAACP
Brown v. Board of Education → Separating children in public schools based on race was unconstitutional
Thurgood Marshall → Civil rights lawyer who used the courts to fight the Brown v. Board of Education
Civil Rights Act of 1964 → Bans segregation and discrimination in all public facilities
Voting↴
Grandfather Clause → “If your grandfather voted, you can vote”
Literacy test → Exam for assessing a person's ability to read and write
24th Amendment → Bans poll taxes (a tax that must be paid to vote)
Voting Rights Act (1965) → Bars literacy tests and the federal government will not enforce equal voting rights
Affirmative action↴
Types of Segregation:
De Jure (in jury)
Most common in the south
Separation of races is required by government laws
De Facto (in fact)
Separation of races is not required by law
Cause by personal prejudice, customs, and choices that individuals and families make
Affirmative action:
improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society.
employment and education.
equal access to education for those groups that have been historically excluded or underrepresented, such as women and minorities.
Controversy surrounding the constitutionality of affirmative action programs has made the topic one of heated debate.
Cases:
California v. Bakke
Alan Bakke was a white student who had been denied admission twice to the medical school of the University of California
He had better grades the some minority students who were accepted to the school
He felt his 14th Amendment rights were violated
Quota - a certain percentage of minorities who must be admitted
Reverse Discrimination - discrimination that targets white people as the victim
Verdict: affirmative action is constitutional, but racial quotas are not
Gratz. V. Bollinger
To be accepted at the University of Michigan, a student had to score 100 points on the admission scale
Jennifer Gratz was a white woman who was denied admission
She claimed her 14th Amendment rights were violated
In Michigan's admission policy, certain minority groups earned bonus points in the admission process
Verdict: Gratz; her First Amendment rights were violated
Harvard Admission Policy
Asian Americans felt their rights were being violated
Harvard's use of the 'personal score' unfairly improved Black and Hispanic students chances of admission
Verdict: Harvard's admissions policy was acceptable