Judiciary Test Review
Characteristics of the Judiciary
Jurisdiction
Original Jurisdiction refers to the first hearing of a case, where facts are presented
Trial Courts, Federal District Courts, Sometimes the SCOTUS
Appellate Jurisdiction refers to an upper court reviewing/revising the decision of a lower court
Court of Appeals, SCOTUS
Most of SCOTUS cases are brought up into the SCOTUS through Appellate Jurisdiction
Judicial Review
Principle established by the court case Marbury v. Madison
Gave SCOTUS the ability to review acts of Congress and of the Executive Branch to determine constitutionality
Types of cases the Supreme Court can hear
Cases in which the Federal Government is a party
Solicitor General argues on behalf of the Federal Government
Cases involving members of different states
When there is a conflict among lower courts
Cases involving important social issues
Federalist Paper #78
Argued for Lifetime Tenure
Judges and Justices will stay in their position until they retire or expire
Subject to impeachment
Argued that lifetime tenure takes away political pressures, insuring a fair and just judiciary
Best device for insuring judicial independence
Argued that the Judicial Branch is least powerful
Only have power to judge, not act
Depend on Executive branch to carry out laws
Judiciary needs to be independent
To protect against government and from factions
Types of Law
Criminal
Related to protection of property and individual safety
Civil
Involves relationships between individuals or groups
The Federal Court System
Judiciary Act of 1789’
Created 3-tiered court system with SCOTUS at the top, followed by the Courts of Appeal and District Courts
Established amount of SCOTUS justices
Characteristics of Federal District Courts, jurisdiction
Only have original jurisdiction
94 in total, all states have at least one
Characteristics of Us Court of Appeals, jurisdiction
Appellate jurisdiction (appeals) meaning they review decisions from District Courts
11 courts, 12th is for Federal Regulatory Commissions and 13th regards patents
Characteristics of the SCOTUS, jurisdiction
Mostly appellate jurisdiction, although can have either
8 associate justices, one chief justice
Chief justice is the spokesperson, does not have any extra votes or privileges
Justices are appointed by the current president and approved by the Senate
Each justice has four clerks that can assist in choosing which cases to recommend that they hear based on the criteria above
Once a case is suggested, four out of the eight remaining justices must vote to hear the case creating a 5-4 majority
Rule of Four
Legislative Checks on the Judiciary
Can impeach justices
Propose amendments which cannot be reviewed by the SCOTUS
Control amount of SCOTUS justices
Judiciary Act of 1789
Control amount of Federal Courts
Executive Checks on the Judiciary
Executive can ignore to implement unpopular laws
Appointing justices, having a direct impact on the political and ideological makeup of the Judicial Branch
SCOTUS Nomination Process
Nominating Criteria
Competence
Most nominees have had some judicial, legal, or governmental experience, for example as a clerk for a SCOTUS justice
Do not need experience as a judge or lawyer
Ideology / Policy Preference
Most presidents seek to appoint individuals who share policy preferences with themselves
Pursuit of Political Support
Choosing nominees in order to help reelection efforts
Nomination/Confirmation Process
Potential candidates are chosen by White House staff members and sent to FBI for background checks
Qualified (according to ABA) members are sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for an investigation and testimony
Only been a practice seen the 80s
Nominee must receive a majority vote in order to pass to Senate vote
Rejections can be predicted quite easily, as the Senate Judiciary Committee holds a lot of power
Controversy over picks to the Bench
“Bait and Switch” - Justice not voting with party preferences of the president that appointed them
Issues of Diversity
Media Coverage
How a case gets to the Supreme Court
Role of Clerks
Clerks help choose the most important cases for the Discuss List
4 per justice
Rule of Four
Four justices, along with the justice who suggested it, must agree to hear a case
Results in 5-4 majority in favor of hearing a case
Granting Certiorari - conditions
Cases in which the federal government is a party
Solicitor general argues on behalf of the government
Conflict among lower courts
Constitutional questions
Involves important social issues
Amicus Curiae Briefs
From interest groups or individuals, stating why a certain case should be heard
Types of Opinions
Majority Opinion
Opinion of the majority of the justices, winning opinion in the case
Concurrent Opinion
Agrees with majority opinion
Dissenting Opinion
Disagrees with the opinion of the majority
Decisions
Precedent
A decision that serves as a rule for settling future cases of a similar nature
Stare Decisis
Reliance on past decisions (precedents) to formulate new decisions
Judicial Philosophies
Judicial Activism
Judges using power broadly
It is appropriate to correct injustices committed by other branches
Judicial Restraint
Courts should allow decisions of other branches to stand
Strict Constructionism
Models of Judicial Decision Making
Behavioral
Differences in background
Experiences
Religious values
education
Attitudinal
Preferences towards issues of public policy
Party identification
their interpretations
political leanings
The Strategic Model
Thinking about how internal/external variables will be affect by their decision
Characteristics of the Judiciary
Jurisdiction
Original Jurisdiction refers to the first hearing of a case, where facts are presented
Trial Courts, Federal District Courts, Sometimes the SCOTUS
Appellate Jurisdiction refers to an upper court reviewing/revising the decision of a lower court
Court of Appeals, SCOTUS
Most of SCOTUS cases are brought up into the SCOTUS through Appellate Jurisdiction
Judicial Review
Principle established by the court case Marbury v. Madison
Gave SCOTUS the ability to review acts of Congress and of the Executive Branch to determine constitutionality
Types of cases the Supreme Court can hear
Cases in which the Federal Government is a party
Solicitor General argues on behalf of the Federal Government
Cases involving members of different states
When there is a conflict among lower courts
Cases involving important social issues
Federalist Paper #78
Argued for Lifetime Tenure
Judges and Justices will stay in their position until they retire or expire
Subject to impeachment
Argued that lifetime tenure takes away political pressures, insuring a fair and just judiciary
Best device for insuring judicial independence
Argued that the Judicial Branch is least powerful
Only have power to judge, not act
Depend on Executive branch to carry out laws
Judiciary needs to be independent
To protect against government and from factions
Types of Law
Criminal
Related to protection of property and individual safety
Civil
Involves relationships between individuals or groups
The Federal Court System
Judiciary Act of 1789’
Created 3-tiered court system with SCOTUS at the top, followed by the Courts of Appeal and District Courts
Established amount of SCOTUS justices
Characteristics of Federal District Courts, jurisdiction
Only have original jurisdiction
94 in total, all states have at least one
Characteristics of Us Court of Appeals, jurisdiction
Appellate jurisdiction (appeals) meaning they review decisions from District Courts
11 courts, 12th is for Federal Regulatory Commissions and 13th regards patents
Characteristics of the SCOTUS, jurisdiction
Mostly appellate jurisdiction, although can have either
8 associate justices, one chief justice
Chief justice is the spokesperson, does not have any extra votes or privileges
Justices are appointed by the current president and approved by the Senate
Each justice has four clerks that can assist in choosing which cases to recommend that they hear based on the criteria above
Once a case is suggested, four out of the eight remaining justices must vote to hear the case creating a 5-4 majority
Rule of Four
Legislative Checks on the Judiciary
Can impeach justices
Propose amendments which cannot be reviewed by the SCOTUS
Control amount of SCOTUS justices
Judiciary Act of 1789
Control amount of Federal Courts
Executive Checks on the Judiciary
Executive can ignore to implement unpopular laws
Appointing justices, having a direct impact on the political and ideological makeup of the Judicial Branch
SCOTUS Nomination Process
Nominating Criteria
Competence
Most nominees have had some judicial, legal, or governmental experience, for example as a clerk for a SCOTUS justice
Do not need experience as a judge or lawyer
Ideology / Policy Preference
Most presidents seek to appoint individuals who share policy preferences with themselves
Pursuit of Political Support
Choosing nominees in order to help reelection efforts
Nomination/Confirmation Process
Potential candidates are chosen by White House staff members and sent to FBI for background checks
Qualified (according to ABA) members are sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for an investigation and testimony
Only been a practice seen the 80s
Nominee must receive a majority vote in order to pass to Senate vote
Rejections can be predicted quite easily, as the Senate Judiciary Committee holds a lot of power
Controversy over picks to the Bench
“Bait and Switch” - Justice not voting with party preferences of the president that appointed them
Issues of Diversity
Media Coverage
How a case gets to the Supreme Court
Role of Clerks
Clerks help choose the most important cases for the Discuss List
4 per justice
Rule of Four
Four justices, along with the justice who suggested it, must agree to hear a case
Results in 5-4 majority in favor of hearing a case
Granting Certiorari - conditions
Cases in which the federal government is a party
Solicitor general argues on behalf of the government
Conflict among lower courts
Constitutional questions
Involves important social issues
Amicus Curiae Briefs
From interest groups or individuals, stating why a certain case should be heard
Types of Opinions
Majority Opinion
Opinion of the majority of the justices, winning opinion in the case
Concurrent Opinion
Agrees with majority opinion
Dissenting Opinion
Disagrees with the opinion of the majority
Decisions
Precedent
A decision that serves as a rule for settling future cases of a similar nature
Stare Decisis
Reliance on past decisions (precedents) to formulate new decisions
Judicial Philosophies
Judicial Activism
Judges using power broadly
It is appropriate to correct injustices committed by other branches
Judicial Restraint
Courts should allow decisions of other branches to stand
Strict Constructionism
Models of Judicial Decision Making
Behavioral
Differences in background
Experiences
Religious values
education
Attitudinal
Preferences towards issues of public policy
Party identification
their interpretations
political leanings
The Strategic Model
Thinking about how internal/external variables will be affect by their decision