1.5 - Conservatism

based on a sceptical view of human nature with a preference for stability and a belief in gradual change

its core ideas relate to views about human nature, the state, society and the economy

Pragmatism

preference for practical solutions over abstract theory

society should change gradually to avoid instability or revolution (incremental reform over radical change)

values empirical evidence - politicians should act on ‘what works’

human nature: flawed → need for cautious, practical decision-making

state: should govern cautiously; reform to conserve

society: gradual, organic change

economy: avoid sudden economic upheaval; pragmatic adjustments

agreement - ALL Conservatives accept pragmatism as essential to preserve order in society - Traditional and One Nation conservatives use pragmatism to justify ‘reform to conserve’

disagreement - New Right (neo-liberals) reject pragmatism as they have a more positive view of human nature

Tradition

the “accumulated wisdom of past generations” (Burke) - conservatives believe we should respect tradition

provides stability, shared identity and social cohesion

respect for long-standing institutions (monarchy, Parliament, family)

linked to pragmatism - what worked in the past shouldn’t be rapidly changed

human nature: people seek security and familiarity

state: institutions embody accumulated wisdom

society: organic and stable rooted in continuity

economy: cautious economic reform; preserve inherited frameworks

KEY THINKERS are Edmund Burke - society is a partnership between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born”

agreement - Traditional & One Nation conservatives view tradition as vital for stability

disagreement - New Right value tradition mainly for law and order

Human Imperfection

conservatives believe humans are flawed and cannot be perfected, pyschologically, morally and intellectually

people require strong authority, law and order and stable institutions

society should prioritise order over liberty

pyschologically, humans desire security, not freedom

morally, people are selfish and need guidance

intelectually, humans are limited and can’t understand complex change

human nature: inherently flawed

state: needs strong, authoritative government

society: requires hierarchy and order

economy: scepticism towards radical economic change

KEY THINKERS are Hobbes - life without authority is “nasty, brutish and short”

agreement - all conservatives accept human imperfection as justification for authority

disagreement - New Right hold a more optimistic view of rationality and self-reliance

Organic State

society is like an organism - it grows and changes naturally overtime

individuals are interdependent

social hierarchy is natural and beneficial

‘Noblesse oblige’: those at the top have obligations to those below

stability depends on shared values and traditions

human nature: people rely on structured communities

state: natural hierarchy supports authority

society: cohesion based on shared values and gradual evolution

economy: preference for ordered, stable economic relationships

KEY THINKERS are Edmund Burke - society is a “partnership in all art and science”

agreement - traditional & One Nation conservatives defend organic hierarchy

disagreement - New Right emphasise atomistic individualism over organicism

Paternalism

the powerful have a duty (noblesse oblige) to care for the less fortunate

the state should intervene to maintain stability and harmony

supports welfare and gradual reform within a natural hierarchy

inequality is natural but creates moral obligations

human nature - people need guidance

state - authority acts benevolently for public good

society - hierarchy with mutual obligations

economy - cautious support for welfare to maintain order

KEY THINKERS are Michael Oakeshott - government should maintain peace, not impose radical change

agreement - traditional & One Nation conservatives endorse paternalism

disagreement - New Right reject paternalism in favour of individual responsibility and minimal state

Types of Conservatism

Traditional Conservatism

emerged after the French Revolution as a defence of sociel hierarchy and order

Conservatives feared that radical change would undermine social cohesion

traditional institutions should be preserved

society is shaped by a natural hierarchy of governance, making inequality inevitable - paired with paternalistic duty to support those in need

One-Nation Conservatism

emerged as a response to the poverty that developed during the Industrial Revolution

promotes the unity of the whole nation, encourages all classes to feel a shared identity

advocates for limited reforms to prevent social unrest

economically, One-Nation conservatives argued for centrist policies and a mixed economy - accepting limited state intervention when necessary

New Right Conservatism

Neo-Liberals

concerned with the economy and individual freedom

support free-market economics, low tax and deregulation

favour minimal state intervention in the economy

believe in an atomistic view of society and a more positive view of human rationality

Neo-Conservatives

concerned with society, cohesion and traditional values

emphasise law, order and moral authority

seek to restore importance of social hierarchy

Key Thinkers

Thomas Hobbes (Traditional Conservatism)

  • humans are naturally selfish, driven by fear and desire for power

  • without authority, life would be "nasty, brutish and short"

  • a strong state (the Leviathan) is needed to maintain order — people give up freedom in exchange for security

Edmund Burke (Traditional)

  • society is organic — it evolves naturally through tradition and inherited wisdom

  • radical change is dangerous as it destroys this natural balance

  • hierarchy is natural and the ruling elite have a paternalistic duty to care for society

Michael Oakeshott (Traditional)

  • politics should be pragmatic, not ideological — government's job is to maintain order, not pursue abstract theories

  • human imperfection means rational social engineering will always fail

  • stability and tradition are what provide security

Ayn Rand (New Right - Neo Liberal)

  • radical individualism — people should pursue rational self-interest without state interference

  • believes laissez faire capitalism stimulates businesses

  • rejects welfare and collectivism entirely

  • the state should only protect private property, nothing more as if theres too much interference,

Robert Nozick (New right - Neo Liberal)

  • advocated a "night-watchman state" — the state should only protect individuals from force, theft and fraud

  • redistribution of wealth violates individual rights — taxation is essentially theft

Benjamin Disraeli (One Nation)

  • society is divided into "two nations" — the rich and the poor — and the state must bridge this divide to maintain unity and stability

  • the ruling class has a paternalistic duty to improve conditions for the lower classes to preserve social cohesion

  • reform from above is preferable to revolution from below — incremental change prevents more radical upheaval

  • accepted capitalism but believed in limited state intervention when necessary
    is that fine

having a small state is a core conservative idea

pessimistic view of human nature is a core conservative idea

laissez-faire capitalism is a core conservative idea