Note
0.0
(0)
Rate it
Take a practice test
Chat with Kai
undefined Flashcards
0 Cards
0.0
(0)
Explore Top Notes
FBLA Help Desk
Note
Studied by 163 people
5.0
(2)
Chapter 3: Using Time Effectively to Maximize Points
Note
Studied by 36 people
5.0
(2)
IDH - isvett + livräddning
Note
Studied by 6 people
5.0
(1)
Unit 6: Simple Harmonic Motion
Note
Studied by 92 people
4.0
(1)
Chapter 18: America Transformed into the Industrial Giant of the World (1870– 1910)
Note
Studied by 38 people
5.0
(1)
Eating Disorders
Note
Studied by 20 people
5.0
(1)
Home
Research Methods and Experimental Design
Research Methods and Experimental Design
Unit 1: Research Methods
1.1 Experiments
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
: A testable statement based on the aims of an investigation.
Alternative Hypothesis
: Predicts a difference in the DV (Dependent Variable) due to changes in the IV (Independent Variable).
Directional Hypothesis (one-tailed)
: Predicts the direction (increase/decrease) of the relationship between variables.
Non-directional Hypothesis (two-tailed)
: States that a relationship exists without specifying the direction of the difference.
Null Hypothesis
: Suggests that any observed difference or correlation is due to chance, with no real pattern arising from the variables being studied.
Sampling Methods
Opportunity Sampling
Definition
: Participants are chosen based on their availability.
Example
: Selecting university students present at the research location.
Strengths
:
Quick and easy method.
Can yield a larger sample size.
Weaknesses
:
Often non-representative due to limited variety.
Potential for bias.
Volunteer Sampling
Definition
: Participants are invited to participate, often responding to advertisements.
Example
: Recruitment through flyers or online ads.
Strengths
:
Easy recruitment as participants self-select.
Likely to have committed participants.
Weaknesses
:
Non-representative due to similarity among respondents.
Risk of low response rates.
Random Sampling
Definition
: All members of a population are assigned numbers, and participants are selected randomly.
Example
: Pulling numbers from a hat or using a random number generator.
Strengths
:
More likely to be representative.
Quick to administer.
Weaknesses
:
Random sampling might inadvertently yield unequal representation (e.g., many participants from one demographic).
Experimental Variables
Experiment
: An investigation to determine relationships between variables.
Independent Variable (IV)
: The factor manipulated to create different conditions in the experiment.
Dependent Variable (DV)
: The factor measured in the experiment.
Operationalization
: The clear description of a variable for accurate manipulation and measurement.
Controlling Variables
Controls
: Techniques to ensure potential confounding variables remain constant.
Standardization
: Keeping procedures identical for all participants.
Confounding Variables
: Uncontrolled variables that may systematically affect the DV, obscuring the relationship with the IV.
Participant Variables
: Individual differences (age, personality, intelligence) that could influence results.
Situational Variables
: Environmental factors that can act as confounding variables (e.g., light, noise).
Experimental Conditions
Experimental Group/Condition
: Represents one or more levels of the IV.
Control Group/Condition
: A level of IV where the IV is absent, used for comparison.
Types of Experiments
Lab Experiments
:
Strengths
: Good control of variables, causal relationships can be determined, standardized procedures enhance reliability.
Weaknesses
: Artificial settings may affect behavior, leading to demand characteristics.
Field Experiments
:
Strengths
: More natural behaviors due to real settings, reduced demand characteristics.
Weaknesses
: Harder to control variables, raising issues of reliability and replication.
Experimental Design
Independent Measures
: Different groups for each IV level; reduces order effects but may suffer from individual differences.
Repeated Measures
: Same participants used in all conditions; risks order effects (practice/fatigue).
Counterbalancing
: Balances order effects by varying the sequence of conditions.
Matched Pairs
: Participants paired based on relevant characteristics; helps control individual differences but may be difficult to execute properly.
Validity
Validity
: The extent to which the researcher is measuring what they claim to.
Ecological Validity
: Generalizability of findings to real-world situations.
Objectivity vs. Subjectivity
: Depend on personal bias in data interpretation.
Demand Characteristics
: Factors that influence behavior by revealing study aims.
Reliability
Reliability
: Consistency of results across multiple trials.
Inter-rater Reliability
: Consistency between different researchers interpreting data similarly.
Test-retest Reliability
: Consistency of results when the same test is repeated under similar conditions.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical Guidelines
: Considerations aimed at protecting participants' welfare.
Protection from Harm
: Participants should not face undue risks.
Informed Consent
: Participants must understand the study to agree.
Right to Withdraw
: Participants can leave the study any time.
Confidentiality and Privacy
: Safeguarding personal information and emotional space.
Debriefing
: Providing explanations of the study's aims and outcomes after completion.
Ethical Guidelines Specific to Animals
Minimizing Harm
: Ensuring ethical treatment of animals used in research.
Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement
: Methods to lessen animal use and suffering during experiments.
Note
0.0
(0)
Rate it
Take a practice test
Chat with Kai
undefined Flashcards
0 Cards
0.0
(0)
Explore Top Notes
FBLA Help Desk
Note
Studied by 163 people
5.0
(2)
Chapter 3: Using Time Effectively to Maximize Points
Note
Studied by 36 people
5.0
(2)
IDH - isvett + livräddning
Note
Studied by 6 people
5.0
(1)
Unit 6: Simple Harmonic Motion
Note
Studied by 92 people
4.0
(1)
Chapter 18: America Transformed into the Industrial Giant of the World (1870– 1910)
Note
Studied by 38 people
5.0
(1)
Eating Disorders
Note
Studied by 20 people
5.0
(1)