IU

Research Methods and Experimental Design

Unit 1: Research Methods

1.1 Experiments

Hypothesis
  • Hypothesis: A testable statement based on the aims of an investigation.
  • Alternative Hypothesis: Predicts a difference in the DV (Dependent Variable) due to changes in the IV (Independent Variable).
    • Directional Hypothesis (one-tailed): Predicts the direction (increase/decrease) of the relationship between variables.
    • Non-directional Hypothesis (two-tailed): States that a relationship exists without specifying the direction of the difference.
  • Null Hypothesis: Suggests that any observed difference or correlation is due to chance, with no real pattern arising from the variables being studied.
Sampling Methods
  1. Opportunity Sampling

    • Definition: Participants are chosen based on their availability.
    • Example: Selecting university students present at the research location.
    • Strengths:
      • Quick and easy method.
      • Can yield a larger sample size.
    • Weaknesses:
      • Often non-representative due to limited variety.
      • Potential for bias.
  2. Volunteer Sampling

    • Definition: Participants are invited to participate, often responding to advertisements.
    • Example: Recruitment through flyers or online ads.
    • Strengths:
      • Easy recruitment as participants self-select.
      • Likely to have committed participants.
    • Weaknesses:
      • Non-representative due to similarity among respondents.
      • Risk of low response rates.
  3. Random Sampling

    • Definition: All members of a population are assigned numbers, and participants are selected randomly.
    • Example: Pulling numbers from a hat or using a random number generator.
    • Strengths:
      • More likely to be representative.
      • Quick to administer.
    • Weaknesses:
      • Random sampling might inadvertently yield unequal representation (e.g., many participants from one demographic).

Experimental Variables

  • Experiment: An investigation to determine relationships between variables.
  • Independent Variable (IV): The factor manipulated to create different conditions in the experiment.
  • Dependent Variable (DV): The factor measured in the experiment.
  • Operationalization: The clear description of a variable for accurate manipulation and measurement.
Controlling Variables
  • Controls: Techniques to ensure potential confounding variables remain constant.
  • Standardization: Keeping procedures identical for all participants.
  • Confounding Variables: Uncontrolled variables that may systematically affect the DV, obscuring the relationship with the IV.
  • Participant Variables: Individual differences (age, personality, intelligence) that could influence results.
  • Situational Variables: Environmental factors that can act as confounding variables (e.g., light, noise).

Experimental Conditions

  • Experimental Group/Condition: Represents one or more levels of the IV.
  • Control Group/Condition: A level of IV where the IV is absent, used for comparison.

Types of Experiments

  • Lab Experiments:

    • Strengths: Good control of variables, causal relationships can be determined, standardized procedures enhance reliability.
    • Weaknesses: Artificial settings may affect behavior, leading to demand characteristics.
  • Field Experiments:

    • Strengths: More natural behaviors due to real settings, reduced demand characteristics.
    • Weaknesses: Harder to control variables, raising issues of reliability and replication.

Experimental Design

  1. Independent Measures: Different groups for each IV level; reduces order effects but may suffer from individual differences.
  2. Repeated Measures: Same participants used in all conditions; risks order effects (practice/fatigue).
    • Counterbalancing: Balances order effects by varying the sequence of conditions.
  3. Matched Pairs: Participants paired based on relevant characteristics; helps control individual differences but may be difficult to execute properly.

Validity

  • Validity: The extent to which the researcher is measuring what they claim to.
    • Ecological Validity: Generalizability of findings to real-world situations.
    • Objectivity vs. Subjectivity: Depend on personal bias in data interpretation.
    • Demand Characteristics: Factors that influence behavior by revealing study aims.

Reliability

  • Reliability: Consistency of results across multiple trials.
    • Inter-rater Reliability: Consistency between different researchers interpreting data similarly.
    • Test-retest Reliability: Consistency of results when the same test is repeated under similar conditions.

Ethical Considerations

  • Ethical Guidelines: Considerations aimed at protecting participants' welfare.
    • Protection from Harm: Participants should not face undue risks.
    • Informed Consent: Participants must understand the study to agree.
    • Right to Withdraw: Participants can leave the study any time.
    • Confidentiality and Privacy: Safeguarding personal information and emotional space.
  • Debriefing: Providing explanations of the study's aims and outcomes after completion.

Ethical Guidelines Specific to Animals

  • Minimizing Harm: Ensuring ethical treatment of animals used in research.
    • Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement: Methods to lessen animal use and suffering during experiments.