Week 3 Notes – Summative & Authentic Assessment, SCASA Judging Standards
Administrative Overview
Part A = focus on summative & authentic assessment.
Part B = deep dive into SCASA (School Curriculum and Standards Authority) judging standards to prepare for:
This week’s tutorial brainstorming activity.
Forth-coming moderation assignment.
Tutorials this week replace the usual lecture review with a “reading challenge.”
Tutorial time also used to apply judging-standard knowledge to design assessment ideas.
Summative Assessment ("Assessment of Learning")
Definition: Determines what students know/ can do after the teaching–learning cycle has paused.
Tends to be formal & structured (e.g., topic tests, end-of-unit quizzes, standardised tests, prepared presentations).
Directly linked to mandatory reporting (twice a year).
The same dataset can later be used diagnostically to plan new learning—even though feedback is no longer immediate.
Classification (diagnostic / formative / summative) depends not on the task but on what the teacher subsequently does with the data.
Key Assessment Principles (apply equally to summative)
Four universal principles to uphold:
Reliability
Validity
Fairness
Flexibility
Authenticity deserves special emphasis when a task is summative.
Authentic Assessment
Task mirrors the real-world application of the targeted skills/knowledge (“situated” tasks).
Connects to the Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration goals:
Goal 1 – promote excellence & equity.
Goal 2 – ensure all Australians become confident, creative individuals; successful, lifelong learners; active & informed citizens.
Implication: Assessment should prepare students for life beyond school; therefore tasks must be situated and meaningful outside the classroom.
Rich, Integrated, Real-World Task Example (Year 5)
Objective: Assess speaking & listening (English curriculum) authentically.
Task: Students write, record & publish a podcast episode.
Why “rich”? Combines multiple curricula & skills:
HASS – research content, e.g.
Swan River Colony development.
English – draft, edit, refine informative script (structure & language features).
Oral language – practise pace, tone, inflection, volume.
Digital Technologies – storyboard, record, edit using audio software.
Benefits:
Higher engagement → truer evidence of capability (greater reliability).
Students experience a contemporary, real-world text form (podcasts are ubiquitous).
Planning implications:
Requires early, detailed planning (could span ≈ 5 weeks).
Teaching & learning activities must align with final product.
Workload & Planning Considerations
Authentic summative tasks are time-consuming to design but yield richer data.
Teachers can “think outside the box” yet remain tightly grounded in curriculum descriptors.
SCASA Judging Standards – Navigation Guide
Website path: K–10 > Assessing > Judging Standards.
Requires Extranet login.
Two main resources on each learning-area page:
Assessment Pointers (PDF/Word)
Annotated Work Samples
Assessment Pointers
Break down entire curriculum into strands/sub-strands (Math) or modes (English).
Provide descriptors for grades A → E.
Function:
Clarify what typical C (“satisfactory”) performance looks like.
Show progression to B & A as well as down to D & E.
Important note: Pointers “exemplify” possibilities; not a checklist of everything a student must do.
Annotated Work Samples
Located under “Work Samples” tabs.
Features:
Black annotations = direct quote from an assessment pointer.
Blue annotations = teacher-added evidence specific to that work.
Brief task context (e.g., “students researched Rottnest Island”).
Related content descriptors listed.
Use-cases:
Establish benchmark of each grade.
Support moderation discussions.
Inspire new authentic tasks.
Designing Summative Tasks that Cater for All Achievement Levels
Start planning around the C-grade (satisfactory) expectations.
BUT: Build scope for students to display higher achievement:
Incorporate open-ended questions/problems.
Require application of knowledge in new contexts.
Allow creative representations of understanding.
Otherwise high-achieving students may appear only “C” because the task forbids them demonstrating more.
Reading Challenge (Tutorial Preparation)
Article: Earl (2013) – Summative Assessment in Primary Science.
Recognised as a classic academic journal article; denser language/structure.
Suggested reading strategy:
Print, highlight, annotate.
Pay attention to context & literature review first, then discussion.
Methods/results may be heavy in quantitative data.
Tutorial expectation: Arrive with 3 talking points, e.g.
Insight, question, critique, key takeaway, or method observation.
Rationale: Builds capacity for evidence-based practice & familiarity with academic texts.
Tutorial & Logistics
Week 3 tutorial = device-friendly; small-group work on SCASA navigation & assessment design.
Provide hard copies for those without Extranet access, but online navigation is preferable.
Team meeting time example: Tue 5th, 9 AM (check your timetable).