LC

Child Development: A Cultural Approach – Chapter 2 Comprehensive Notes

Historical Conceptions of Development

  • Four classic cultural-historical schemes illustrate how people have long divided the life span, foreshadowing modern developmental stage theories.

    • Ancient Hindu view (Dharmashastras)

    • Life divided into 4 stages, each lasting 25 years (total life span conceptualized as 100 years).

    • Childhood has further substages marked by rituals (e.g., first head-shaving ceremony symbolizing entry into a new, purified phase).

    • Ethical emphasis: progress through stages meant fulfilling one’s dharma (duty) in both family and society.

    • Ancient Greek view (Solon, 638–558 BCE)

    • Human life segmented into 10 periods of 7 years.

    • First 3 periods (birth to 21) labeled as times of immaturity and learning; adulthood begins only after full social training.

    • Provides an early prototype for the “seven-year rhythm” still referenced in some educational philosophies.

    • Ancient Jewish view (Talmud, written ≈1500 years ago)

    • Prescribes ideals at specific ages: e.g., Bar/Bat Mitzvah at 10–13 (moral accountability), readiness for marriage/work by 18–20, and pursuit of vocation after 30.

    • Emphasizes instruction (literal meaning of “Talmud”)—life progress is both spiritual and practical.

    • Medieval European view (revival in 14^{th} century)

    • Infantia: 0–7; Pueritia: 7–14; Adolescentia: 14–21.

    • Blurred boundary for the end of adolescence (debated then as now).

  • Conclusions across the four traditions

    • Each uses culturally specific markers (rituals, legal milestones, work roles).

    • Common themes: Limited attention to early childhood psychology; adolescence framed as preparation for adult duties.

Developmental Stages in Three Traditional Cultures

  • Shared insight: People are seen as qualitatively different from one stage to the next; terms for stages carry explicit role expectations.

  • Gusii (Kenya)

    • Infancy (birth–2): constant maternal care.

    • Middle childhood (~6): children herd cattle, care for siblings.

    • Adolescence: initiation rites at 9 (girls) and 12 (boys) marking biological and social puberty.

    • Marriage: girls ~15, boys 25–30 → transition to full adulthood.

  • Trobriand Islanders (Papua New Guinea)

    • 0–4: intensive doting.

    • 4 to puberty: extended play period.

    • Adolescence: leisure, sanctioned romantic/sexual exploration.

    • Young adulthood begins at marriage (timing negotiated, often following long courtship).

  • Maya (Yucatán, Mexico)

    • Infancy: mother, sisters, grandmothers provide care.

    • Middle childhood: gender-specific chores (boys in fields, girls in household crafts).

    • Adolescence: cross-sex socializing discouraged; courtship arranged via intricate rituals lasting up to 2 years.

  • Synthesis for science

    • Stage labels correspond to shifts in responsibility, agency, and permissible behavior.

    • Highlights need for context-sensitive theories that do not impose Western milestones universally.

Psychosocial Theory (Erik Erikson)

  • Core premise: Development driven by quest for social integration within cultural context.

  • Epigenetic principle: Each stage built on resolution (or non-resolution) of previous crises.

  • First five stages (lifespan model totals 8):

    1. Trust vs. Mistrust (Infancy, 0–1): secure attachment vs. fear.

    2. Autonomy vs. Shame/Doubt (Toddlerhood, 1–3): self-control vs. over-dependence.

    3. Initiative vs. Guilt (Early Childhood, 3–6): purposeful action vs. inhibition.

    4. Industry vs. Inferiority (Middle Childhood, 6–12): competence in cultural skills vs. feelings of inadequacy.

    5. Identity vs. Identity Confusion (Adolescence, 12–19): coherent self vs. role diffusion.

  • Significance: integrates cultural expectations (e.g., schooling) into psychological growth, bridging Freudian intrapsychic focus with sociological factors.

Cognitive-Developmental Theories

  • Jean Piaget’s Stage Model

    • Qualitative shifts in thinking (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, formal operational).

    • Driving mechanisms:

    • Maturation (biologically programmed neural growth).

    • Active construction of schemes—mental structures for organizing reality.

    • Processes: assimilation (fit new info into existing scheme) and accommodation (modify scheme).

    • Implication: Cannot simply teach a 1-year-old tasks requiring the scheme maturity of a 4-year-old (principle of readiness).

Learning Theories

  • Behaviorism (Watson, Skinner)

    • Newborn is a tabula rasa; behavior shaped via conditioning.

  • Social Learning Theory (Bandura)

    • Observational learning: children imitate models who are rewarded/not punished.

    • Adds cognition—children evaluate consequences (Social-Cognitive extension).

  • Educational takeaway: Modeling prosocial behavior + reinforcing desired actions promote development.

Biological Theories

  • Evolutionary Psychology

    • Traits like language reflect adaptive pressures; e.g., Bayesian word-learning: children compute statistical regularities.

  • Behavior Genetics

    • Partition variance in traits into genetic, shared environment, non-shared environment components (e.g., h^{2} heritability estimates).

    • Gene–environment interaction/epigenetics: environments influence gene expression.

  • Neuroscience

    • Brain plasticity greatest in early life, but continues lifelong; environmental enrichment/poverty can alter neural circuits.

Contextual Theories

  • Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems

    • 5 nested systems:

    • Microsystem (family, school).

    • Mesosystem (relations among microsystems).

    • Exosystem (indirect institutions—parent’s workplace).

    • Macrosystem (cultural values, laws).

    • Chronosystem (time & historical changes).

  • Developmental Systems Theory (Lerner)

    • Individual⇄context co-actions across life; child as active agent; rejects deterministic one-directional causality.

Cultural Theories

  • Three critiques/points

    1. Research biased toward majority-culture, Western samples.

    2. Classic theories underplay cultural shaping.

    3. Judging minority practices by majority standards leads to deficit framing.

  • Emphasis on cultural relativism: Behaviors must be interpreted within local values (e.g., cooperation = intelligence in Zambia).

Family Context

  • Form exists universally, but structure/function shift historically:

    • 1800: family performed educational, religious, medical, economic, recreational, affective roles.

    • 2000: schools, churches, healthcare, employers, entertainment industry now handle many functions; affective care remains.

  • Extended families common in traditional cultures; nuclear in industrialized societies.

Friends, Peers, Romantic Partners

  • Peers: share status (age, grade); salient from toddlerhood.

  • Friends: mutual affection; becomes crucial in middle childhood/adolescence.

  • Romantic partners: introduce intense emotion + sexuality; cultural norms dictate timing and acceptable behavior.

School as Developmental Context

  • Formal schooling starts earlier (often
    5 years).

  • Academic success linked to later socioeconomic outcomes.

  • Global inequalities: developed vs. developing nations, and intra-nation disparities.

Work

  • Developed countries

    • Legal minimum work age 15; about 50\% of U.S. teens hold part-time jobs, primarily for discretionary spending.

  • Developing countries

    • 95\% of employed 5–17-year-olds live here.

    • 70\% of that employment classed as child labor—economic necessity overrides schooling.

Media

  • Diffusion: spread of TV, Internet, mobile technology mapped globally.

  • Children as “digital natives”: screen time now a major environmental input affecting cognition, socialization.

Civic & Religious Institutions

  • Civic engagement: volunteering, political activism; shaped by governance structure (e.g., democratic vs. authoritarian regimes).

  • Religiosity

    • Almost universal in traditional cultures; U.S. unusually high among developed nations; African American youth especially involved.

Developmental Questions and Debates

  • Early Experiences

    • Sensitive periods: windows of heightened neuroplasticity; deprivation here → long-term deficits.

  • Children as Active Agents

    • Bidirectional effects: child temperament influences parenting, which feeds back into child behavior.

    • Child-selected niches intensify with age (e.g., choosing friends, extracurriculars).

  • Stage vs. Continuity

    • Empirical data show gradual change, but cultural staging persists for social organization.

  • Nature vs. Nurture

    • Historic pendulum: Freud (intrapsychic, maternal blame) → Watson (environmental control) → modern interactionism.

  • Diversity vs. Universals

    • Research now balancing species-wide patterns (e.g., language acquisition) with culturally unique pathways (e.g., Gusii initiation rites).

Integrated Takeaways for Exam Preparation

  • Recognize interplay among biological maturation, environmental contexts, and cultural meaning systems.

  • Be able to match theorists to core concepts (Erikson—psychosocial crises; Piaget—schemes & stages; Bandura—observational learning; Bronfenbrenner—nested systems).

  • Use traditional culture examples to critique Western-centric assumptions (e.g., adolescence not universally leisure-oriented).

  • Apply sensitive period concept to real-world issues (orphanage deprivation, language acquisition windows).

  • Articulate how digital media layer onto Bronfenbrenner’s exosystem and macrosystem.