Dickinson Ch11: Ruffed Grouse

Dickinson Ch11: Ruffed Grouse

I. General Characteristics and Biology

  • The ruffed grouse is a dedicated quarry for upland bird hunters in the Southern United States.

  • Males advertise presence by "drumming" in spring, which is an indicator of young forest stands and early-successional communities.

  • Clinal Variation (Body Weight and Coloration):

    • Grouse generally follow Bergmann's rule (northern birds are larger).

    • Contradiction: Southern adult males in the Appalachian forests (e.g., North Carolina and Georgia) are often larger (24.1 oz.) than northern counterparts (22.6 oz.).

    • Color variations range from light silver-gray to deep red-brown. Red-phase birds dominate the southern edge of the range.

II. Distribution and Population Status

  • The ruffed grouse is North America's most widely distributed Tetraonid.

  • The southern boundary of the range extends to northern Georgia and the extreme northern edge of Alabama.

  • Grouse are generally more common above 1,500 feet elevation in the Southeast.

  • Southern populations have declined in recent years, particularly in the Southern Appalachian Mountain region.

  • Warm southern climates are potentially detrimental to grouse distribution.

  • Historically, widespread logging (19th and 20th centuries) and the abandonment of family farms created dense, young forest habitat, supporting grouse populations.

  • Today, isolated populations are primarily supported by highly fragmented landscapes.

  • Unlike northern populations, southern populations do not exhibit the pronounced 10-year periodic population cycles.

III. Food Habits

  • Southern grouse feed primarily on herbaceous vegetation year-round, with succulent broad-leaf herbs available mid-spring through late fall.

  • Winter diet relies heavily on succulent herbaceous vegetation, supplemented with fruits (grape, greenbrier, hawthorn) and evergreen broad-leaf plants.

  • Low quality of winter foods may contribute to lower grouse recruitment and populations in the South.

  • Chicks feed primarily on insects during their first few weeks of life.

IV. Habitat Requirements

  • Habitat quality is strongly correlated with stem density and shrub regeneration.

  • Young forest stands (5–15 years old) are optimal, requiring high densities of woody stems (8,000–10,000 stems/acre) for cover against predators.

  • Grouse thrive in early successional forest stands often created by tree harvest.

  • Thermal Protection: Conifers (spruce, fir, red cedar) provide essential thermal protection during prolonged, severe winter weather in the South.

  • Drumming Sites: Preferred sites are typically large diameter, partially decayed fallen logs, rocks, or elevated perches.

  • Nesting: Hens require dense, highly structured habitat (shrubs or overgrown agricultural fields).

V. Habitat Management and Silvicultural Options

  • Ruffed grouse are habitat specialists.

  • Silvicultural treatments (man-made disturbances) are necessary today, replacing historical disturbances like fire and ice damage.

  • Required Treatments: Clearcut, seed-tree, and shelterwood regeneration treatments are used to produce the dense stem requirements.

  • Overstory Removal (Basal Area Reduction): To produce quality regeneration, residual basal areas generally need to be less than 20 sq. ft./acre.

  • Size of Harvest Unit: Optimal harvest unit size is small and scattered, ranging from 0.25 to 10 acres.

  • Herbaceous Openings: Maintaining these openings provides forage quality and increases arthropod (protein) sources for chicks.

  • Conifers: Small planted patches (0.5 acres or less) of Norway spruce or white pine provide critical winter refuge.

VI. Future Trends

  • Ruffed grouse populations are declining throughout much of their range in the Southern U.S..

  • Commercial timber harvest has largely replaced fire as the primary agent of forest disturbance.

  • A significant portion of timberland (70%) in the Southern U.S. is owned by non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners.

  • Public land agencies often face public concerns regarding aggressive habitat practices like clearcut regeneration.