CSS 4300-kai
|
|
Non-Patentable Inventions |
Sec 22. Non-Patentable Inventions. -The following shall be excluded from patent protection (simplified): 22.1. Discoveries and Theories: Basic discoveries and scientific theories. 22.2. Mental Acts and Computer Programs: Schemes, rules, and methods of thinking, playing games, doing business, and computer programs. 22.3. Medical Methods: Methods of treating or diagnosing humans or animals. However, products or compositions used in these methods can be patented. 22.4. Plants, Animals, and Biological Processes: Plant varieties, animal breeds, and essentially biological processes for producing them. Microorganisms and non-biological processes are patentable. 22.5. Aesthetic Creations: Designs and appearances. 22.6. Immoral Inventions: Anything that goes against public order or morality. (Sec. 8, R.A. No. 165a) |
How do Programmers Protect their Programs? |
Sec 172. Literary and Artistic Works. (simplified): 172.1. Original creative works in the literary and artistic domain are protected, including:
|
|
Ownership of Copyright |
Sec 178. Rules on Copyright Ownership. - Copyright ownership shall be governed by the following rules: (simplified): 178.1. Author's Copyright: The author of an original literary or artistic work is the initial owner of the copyright. 178.2. Joint Authorship: In joint authorship, both authors own the copyright, and their rights are governed by co-ownership rules unless there's a specific agreement. 178.3. Works Created During Employment: The copyright for works created during employment belongs to the employer, unless there's a specific agreement to the contrary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 5: The Blogger’s Freedom of Expression and the Cyber Libel Law |
What is Blogging? |
|
Introduction | |
| |
Libel | Slander |
|
|
R.A. 10175 - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 |
Sec. 4(C) Libel. The unlawful or prohibited acts of libel as defined in Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, are committed through a computer system or any other similar means which may be devised in the future. If you use a computer or any other new technology to spread false information that harms someone's reputation, you can be punished by law. |
Philippine Constitution |
Article III Sec 4 of the 1987 |
“No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.” The government can't stop you from thinking, talking, writing, or protesting peacefully. |
Scrope of Freedom of Expression |
|
Article III, Section 18 |
“No person shall be detained solely because of his political beliefs and aspirations.”
You can think freely, but you can't act illegally based on those thoughts. |
Elements of Freedom of Expression |
|
Two Philosophical bases for the guarantee of the Right of Freedom of Expression |
|
Limitation of the Guarantee |
While the Philippine Constitution protects people’s right to free speech and expression, this does not give them free license to write to the detriment of others. While you have the right to say what you want, you can't use that right to hurt others. |
Libel as Unprotected Speech |
If you're a regular person, your private life is your own business. But if you're a public figure, like a politician, people have a right to know about your character and abilities, because they affect how you do your job. |
R.A. 10175 - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 The Revised Penal Code of the Philippines Title Thirteen: Crimes Against Honor/Libel |
Art. 353. Definition of Libel - A libel is public and malicious imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead. Libel is when someone publicly says or writes something false about another person that could damage their reputation. This could include saying they committed a crime, have a bad character, or are not fit for a certain job. |
Art. 353. Requirement for publicity - Every defamatory imputation is presumed to be malicious, even if it be true, if no good intention and justifiable motive for making it is shown, except in the following cases: (simplified)
Libel is saying something false and harmful about someone publicly. However, if you say something negative privately and have a good reason, or if you accurately report on a public event, it's not libel. |
Art. 355. Libel means by writings or similar means -(simplified) If you use writing, printing, radio, TV, or other media to spread false information that harms someone's reputation, you could be fined or imprisoned. You could also be sued by the person you harmed. You can be sued for any public form of false information that can harm a reputation. |
Reason for Punishing Defamation |
“A good name is more desirable than great riches; to be esteemed is better than silver or gold.” - Proverbs 22:1 |
Elements of Defamation |
|
Interpreting Libelous Statement |
Personal hurt, embarrassment, or offense even if true, is not however automatically equivalent to defamation. This is the prevailing legal doctrine. |
Immunity from Libel |
|
Cyber Libel and Libel are distinguished as follows |
|
Law Defining Cyber Libel (R.A. 10175 - Art. 355. Libel means by writings or similar means.) |
Malice: You can be held liable for libel if you knowingly spread false information about someone or if you don't care whether it's true or not. (Yuchengco vc. The Manila Chronicle Publishing Corporation, G.R. No. 184315, 25 November 2009) Identifiability: Even if someone's name isn't mentioned, if people can figure out who you're talking about, you can still be held liable for libel. (Philippine Journalists’ vs Theonen, G.R. No. 143372, 13 December 2005) Balancing Freedom of Speech and Reputation: While freedom of speech is important, it's not absolute. You can't spread false information that harms someone's reputation, even if you think it's true. (Erwin Tulfo vs. People of the Philippines and Atty. Carlos T. So, G.R. No. 161032, 16 September 2008.) |
R.A. 10175 - Art. 360 of the Revised Penal Code |
Art. 360. Persons responsible. - (simplified)
|
END OF CHAPTER 5 |