Gunpowder empires
Common threads; Islam, religious tolerance, social cohesion, growth in culture/arts
Ottomans
Anatolia
Mediterranean and Middle East
Ruled by Turkish sultan located in Istanbul
1281-1922
Most successful and long lasting of gunpowder empires
Militarism > public life
Osmanis
Namesake of Ottomans
Broke away from Seljuks, Turkish leaders in 1281
Faked ancestry that traced back to Muhammed
Conquered Adrianople in 1361 (second most powerful Byzantine city), Constantinople in May 1453
Use gunpowder in warfare, proved strength
Culture
Known for ceramics→made system to mass produce because so many people were buying, people bought for floors in houses, suggested economy was doing well
Calligraphy→Arabic could be used to draw and write at the same time
Very specific military organization
Janissaries
Taken from non-Muslim families when very young, converted to Islam, raised only to be private guard of sultan
Served throughout empire to be fighting force for sultan
Known for horsemanship, talent as foot soldiers
Succeeded due to great training, skill, and gunpowder powered cannons
Highly privileged in society
17th to 18th century→less military, more network of nobles, each city had Janissary neighborhood, lived very well even if surrounding area was poor
Viziers
Most educated/close advisors of sultan, promoted from Janissaries
Pashas/beys
Sent throughout empire to govern far provinces
Collect taxes for sultan, ensure peace
Millet system
Ottoman empire Islamic
Defined people based on religion
Each community governed by own religious laws
Downfall
Lost loyalty to central government
Weak sultans ridiculed by public
Janissaries more interested in personal growth, started fighting with each other, distracted from tax collection
1798→invaded by French, Napoleon I
Disbanded at end of WWI
Safavids
Persia
Centered in Iran
13th century-1722
Shiite Islam state religion
Made distinct from Sunni neighbors
Ismael
Became leader of Safavid Sufi at age seven
Also traced ancestry back through Islam, made himself divine authority
July 1501→ troops captured Tabriz
Ismael declared shah of Azerbaijan, next year shah of Iran
Able to convert many Muslims to Shiism
Arch rivals of Ottoman Empire
Ottoman had better military and gunpowder
Struggled to convert independent Turkish tribal leaders
Art
Miniatures→ small paintings, sponsored by royal family
Painting people would be seen as scandalous to average people in religious society
Came in long series
rugs/tapestries→handmade, Europeans began to put rugs on wall instead of floor because so expensive, very intricate, seen as art
Shah Abbas I
Reorganized military
1603→ recaptured Baghdad from Ottomans
Isfahan
Permanent capital of Safavids
Gained most international attention
Architecture, culture, religious life
Downfall
Began to decline financially and militarily after Abbas death
1722→Isfahan captured by Afghans
Mughals
India
Descended from Turks and Mongols
Merged Persian and Indian culture →Islam as unifying force
Ended 1722→ death of Aurangzeb
Akbar
Greatest leader of Mughals
Ruled during time of expansion through Deccan plateau
Gunpowder used to crush existing forts, Mughals built new stronger ones
Emphasized religious toleration→accepted Hindus, Jews, Christians, etc. as wives, set standard/maintain image of toleration
Cultural growth
Taj Mahal built for Jahan Shah’s favorite wife
Akbar promoted arts
Known for jewels, at the time only place known to have had diamonds
Mixed Islamic and Hindu styles of art→migrates to India when banned by Safavids
Art showing synthesis of traditions promoted by Akbar
Son of court painter of Safavids (Mir Sayid Ali) taken into Mughals, taught their painters
Led many Indians to convert to Islam
Aurangzeb→final ruler
More forceful Muslim authority→no more religious tolerance
Destroyed sacred Hindu sites, taxed other religions
Desired to capture entire subcontinent
Cost too much money, after death in 1707 Mughals fell, British gained control of the area
Ming Dynasty
China 1368 to 1644
Zhu Yuanzhang
Former Buddhist novice
Leader of rebellion against Yuan Dynasty/Mongols
First emperor of Ming
Called Hongwu emperor
Ruthless emperor, reestablished Chinese traditions
Yongle emperor
Maintained and extended military strength→included navy
Nanjing
Capital of Ming dynasty→ 1368
Mongols
Executed
Forced to marry only Chinese
Purely foreign groups not allowed
Arts and culture
Began to flourish
Used income from chinese traders
Ming porcelains, Nanjing and Beijing palaces
“...literature and philosophy experienced a renaissance.”
Downfall
Less capable rulers
Jurchen and Manchu tribes threatened from northeast
Peasant uprisings in northwest
weakened in 1590s fighting against Japan in Korea
Manchu gained power to revolt against Ming, Ming had no money due to taxpayer revolt
Emperor hanged himself in 1644, Qing dynasty created
Zheng He
28 years, seven voyages
Larger ships and fleets than ever known before
Sailed farther than any recorded (at the time)
Sailed China to east Africa, Middle East, India
First voyage→317 ships, about 28,000 men, treasure ships; Vietnam, Java, Thailand, Brunei
Areas traveled through;
Vietnam, Java, Thailand, Brunei, India, Sri Lanka, Sumatra, Hormuz, Oman, Kenya
Explorer, diplomat, fleet admiral
Taken prisoner at age 10 (named Ma He), Ming invaded Yunnan
Won favor of emperor, was freed and slowly given more responsibilities
1405→ 34 years old, assigned to lead fleet of ships to India by Yongle emperor (Zhu Di)
equipment/advancements
Magnetic compass
Very detailed maps
Song Dynasty→gunpowder, ship building
Ming despotism
Trust no one
Very tyrannical
Don’t even trust own people→created new capital
Start of Renaissance→ renaissance implies a society is somehow “starting over”, returning to how things used to be and then progressing from that point; increased interest in ancient values, skills, techniques, etc., notable improvement in art and literature, improvement in standard of living, greater access to education
Most people not well educated
Education became more widespread
People became more confident in themselves→question authority
Italians begin to grow again
Bring back old strategies→architecture, art, etc.
knew that things were better in past than current
Approx. 1400→Italians feel they have overcome gap, got back to where they were before, bring back classical styles
Urban trading hubs revived, money came in, needed for great art and literature→urban middle class comes back
Scholars fleeing from Byzantine empire go to Italy→reeducate western Europe, had been preserving knowledge
Revival of Greek, reading original Bible, question translation
Pope ran Papal States in center of Italy; Venice state in north; Spanish state in south; Florence, controlled my Milan, heart of renaissance→Europeans divided, not unified, at time
Build banking industry, lots of banks created because of new trading opportunities
Spices came into demand in Europe→ ex. Cinnamon cheaper in Holy Land (grows there), can sell in Europe where more expensive, profit from just moving cinnamon→Italians begin to gain money, become doorway to Europe, can transport goods by ship
Supply and demand
Supply→amount of a good or service that sellers are willing and able to sell at various prices, positive slope
Demand→the amount of a good or service buyers are willing to buy at various prices, negative slope
The more money able to make, more willing to sell
As prices go down, more people willing/able to buy
Find equilibrium of both to find price to make sellers and buyers happy→ intersection on two lines of graph, equal number of sellers and buyers at a certain price, point where sellers make most money because most sales
Humanism and writers
Humanism→appreciation for human world
Middle ages→obsessed with afterlife
Increase in social mobility changes how world is seen
Middle class have made profit from trade, have money, want to spend it
Buy bigger home, then need furniture, carpets, tapestries, plumbing→involves many trades, merchant bring money, spend, goes to other people; artists began to make money
Urban middle class invests money in education
Not possible without money, connected to banking
Creates culture of commerce and education
Five characteristics
Secularism
Appreciation for the world of the living→ex. Ancient Romans threw large parties, brought back in renaissance
Individualism
People want to be celebrated for individual fame
Era of renaissance never truly ended→told everyone they are special, unique potential to be whatever you want, opposite of Middle Ages
Pursuit of knowledge
Patronage of the arts
Supporting the arts
Ordinary people willing to pay for arts
Sponsoring arts→way of self promotion; your name tied to the art
Greatest patrons sponsor art schools, first to see art→ Medicchi family, Lorenzo the Magnificent
Single greatest patron in renaissance was Catholic church
Development of politics
Middle Ages→mostly monarchy, not democratic
More republics created
People themselves intelligent enough to make decisions→seen as worthy of voting for ruler
People start to run their own republics in Italy ex. Venice and Milan
Political science
Major writers;
Dante Alighieri
Transitional; wrote Dante’s Inferno, not secular, before renaissance, 1200s, best selling Italian poet, wrote in Italian rather than Latin (Latin international language, Italian vernacular language), so popular his Florence dialect became dominant in all of Italy, individualism, appreciation for ordinary people, wants common people to get to be more educated and ignorant people to read and see they were wrong, wrote in Latin to other writers urging them to write in vernacular rather than Latin, wrote The Divine Comedy, includes Dante’s Inferno, guided by Roman poet Virgil, appreciation of arts, used ancient Greek underworld in story, combined with Christianity, made himself equivalent of great hero, Individualism
Geoffery Chaucer
Transitional; 1300s, wrote in middle English, Canterbury Tales, Canterbury center for religious pilgrimage, wrote stories told at night during travelling that characters told reflecting their characters, would not have been published in Middle Ages, Secularism, published a lot because popular, used money on it,
Francesco Petrarca/Petrarch
Father of humanism, want to learn more besides just business, encouraged free thinking, study writing/art from classical era, most influential western writer before Shakespeare, created own poetic forms, wrote poems to woman named Laura that he is not married to, has real personality and doesn’t make her into a metaphor, never wrote about her again after Black Death gets to Florence, focused on real life
Baldassare Castiglione
Wrote best selling book of entire renaissance, Book of the Courtier, how-to manual for good manners, court home of upper class person, Italian community revolved around parish church and local court, Italians just started becoming rich, behavior crude for status, encouraged poetry, discouraged fighting, spread dancing instead
Desiderius Erasmus
Dutch so called Dutch humanist, wrote satire, used people with influence to make fun of, even Pope, individualism, pointed out corruption in church at time, forerunner of idea common people standing up to authority, In Praise of Folly, wrote about Pope Julius II (warrior pope), goes to heaven and is forgotten/denied
Niccolo Machiavelli
Humanist; involved in politics, supportive of arts, secular, encouraged manipulation over being a good person in politics,
Humanities/Liberal arts
Anything created by for or about humans
Language, social studies, history, art
Thought to free your mind, liberating
/
Machiavelli questions:
In what ways is Niccolo Machiavelli’s advice to princes a break from the teachings of medieval political and moral philosophers?
Niccolo Machiavelli’s advice to princes is a break from the teachings of medieval political and moral philosophers because most people at the time believed the ruler should be governed by religion, but he disagreed strongly with that. He thought the ruler should be cruel and feared.
Would Machiavelli’s political advice help or hurt a politician in a modern democratic society?
I think Machiavelli’s political advice would hurt a politician in a democracy today because if a ruler is too cruel, it is not likely the people will vote for them today. Especially in America, freedom and safe living are very important.
What is Machiavelli’s opinion of the place of virtues and vices in the prince’s daily life?
Machiavelli believed that there should be no ethics included in political thinking. He didn’t like the idea of mixing Christian morals with politics. He believed that rulers should learn to not be good and then decided how much they should use this skill in different situations. He says that rulers should be wary of vices that could take their power over the state away from them. He also says that virtues may at first seem like vices, and the other way around, so rulers should remain wary.
Does Machiavelli see Cesare Borgia as a successful or unsuccessful ruler? Why?
Machiavelli sees Cesare Borgia as a successful ruler because he was cruel, but he was cruel in a way that allowed the people he ruled over to keep peace. He united and brought order to the Romagna.
According to Machiavelli, is it better to be loved or feared? Why?
Machiavelli says that it is safer to be feared more than loved, but someone should try to be both. He says love is kept alive through obligation, which can be broken whenever, but fear is kept alive through punishment, which is much harder to get rid of.
Why should a prince have a cruel reputation according to Machiavelli?
According to Machiavelli, a prince should have a cruel reputation because it helps to keep people in line. He says that without a cruel reputation, a ruler would not be able to unite an army or get them to carry out any duty for him.
Explain Machiavelli’s fox and lion analogy.
Machiavelli’s fox and lion analogy is basically saying that to be a good ruler, you must be two different people at the same time; one sly and cunning and the other powerful and fearsome.
Imagine the following scenarios. What would you do if you were a prince? What would Machiavelli advise you to do?
You have the city of Firenze under siege and will defeat it at any moment. A young man from the city comes to you and offers you his life and complete surrender, if you will just spare the city from destruction. What will you do?
If I were a prince, I would try to defeat the city while sparing as many common people as possible, including the man begging me. If he was really convincing, I might even let his whole city go. Machiavelli, carrying a belief in a cruel reputation, would probably advise me to not listen to this man and continue to defeat the city and any person who got in the way, including the man.
You have conquered Sinegalia and your army is preparing to invade the city. You receive news that some of your troops are preparing to loot the city. Do you stop them?
I would stop the troops from looting the city; it is unnecessary, and can cause destruction that may hurt us more than help us, especially if we are taking control of the city. I think that Machiavelli would encourage the looting of the city because not looting is listening too much to conventional moral codes. Also, looting the city could bring more money into his empire, which could help them to grow and gain more power.
Leaders from two nearby rebel factions came to you on the same day, but separately, asking for your support in their war against the same neighboring government. Do you support either of them?
I would support both groups, and maybe even try to bring them together against the common enemy so that our side of the war is stronger. I think that Machiavelli would do something similar, but use the allies to the advantage of his own state too. I think that ties in with his idea of the ruler needing to be a fox and a lion; sly with his partners and strong with his enemies.
Person | Job/biography | Major works/key terms |
Giotto |
| Life of the Virgin, Life of St. Francis, Life of St. John the Baptist |
Masaccio |
| Tribute Money, Trinity, St. Peter, Expulsion from Eden Quattrocento→Italian for four hundred, nickname for the 1400s Chiaroscuro→figures painted in light and shade, as opposed to how Giotto used sharp lines |
Botticelli |
| Judith and Holofernes, St. Sebastian, Birth of Venus |
Ghiberti |
| Doors to Baptistery in Florence→spent majority of life making 28 panels for door |
Donatello |
| David |
Verrocchio |
| Equestrian statue of Bartolomeo Colleoni |
Donato Bramante |
| Saint Peter’s Basillica |
Leonardo da Vinci |
| Adoration of the Magi, The Last Supper, La Gioconda (the Mona Lise) |
Raphael |
| Portraits of the Madonna |
Michelangelo |
| Ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Moses, Peità, David, The Creation of Adam Uomo universale→universal man, could do many things well Platonism→dualism of soul and body Mannerism→movement in which artists revolted against the serenity and poise of the art of the High Renaissance, tried to share their inner thoughts in a way that caused the viewer to be shocked |
Titian |
| The Venus of Zerbine, The Allegory of Marriage, Venus and Adonis |