Assessment is distinct from daily classroom functioning; it is often external and imposed.
Purpose of assessment of learning contributes to local/state accountability systems.
Results are public and define administrator equity across schools and districts.
Standardized tests have been prevalent in American education for decades; they enable comparisons among schools.
They are designed for general student populations, often leading to skepticism regarding their relevance for ELLs (English Language Learners) or ELLs with disabilities.
In 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice and Education reinforcing civil rights for ELLs in public schools.
Schools must reliably identify ELLs and ensure they receive equitable learning opportunities.
ELLs with disabilities need both language support and disability services.
Testing is a narrow, systematic procedure collecting a sample of student behavior at a point in time.
Assessment involves a comprehensive collection and analysis of information over time, including various data sources.
Evaluation is the broadest, analyzing evidence against specific goals to assess the effectiveness of services or programs.
Continuous feedback and updated data enhance the accuracy of assessments and must cater to all students, especially ELLs.
Involvement of multiple stakeholders and setting clear expectations enhance assessment quality.
Validity is crucial; interpretations from assessments must accurately represent what is being measured.
Systematic errors affecting validity include unfamiliar content, undue assumptions about students' language proficiency, biases in items, and more.
Raw Scores: Total correct answers, lacking context for performance interpretation.
Scale Scores: Provide numerical comparisons where limitations (confidence bands) are also addressed.
No formal definition but generally aim to assess where students are in learning relative to end-of-course expectations.
Administered periodically; not part of regular instruction.
Often commercial products designed to inform and improve practice; they have potential limitations in reflecting true instructional outcomes.
High-stakes tests gauge annual student achievement and accountability at the district/state levels.
Increased focus on testing often pressures educators to teach to the test rather than focusing on comprehensive education.
High-stakes measures must be valid; otherwise, they exacerbate inequity for ELLs and other diverse learners.
Norm-Referenced Tests: Rank students against a normative sample.
Criterion-Referenced Tests: Measure progress against specified criteria, often linked to state standards.
Complex linguistic structures such as passive voice and intricate noun phrases can hinder ELLs' comprehension.
Tests must align with students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds for fair assessment.
Accessibility features and accommodations for ELLs need to be structured thoughtfully during assessments.
ELLs with disabilities are entitled to both sets of accommodations when appropriate.
Research on technology-driven prototypes can enhance fair assessment opportunities for ELLs.
Effectiveness of universal design principles in educational assessments and how accessibility features operate.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) emphasizes annual statewide assessments while ensuring equitable treatment for ELLs and subgroups.
Long-term goals must be defined for ELLs and included in growth measures for accountability.
WIDA Consortium and others are developing standards that account for ELLs’ diverse backgrounds.
Language proficiency assessments help track ELLs' growth and inform instructional strategies.