Topic 8 Recap
Topic 9 - Sources of challenges
Individual vs group-based values
Independence in reality?
Powles minimum standards
Look from a variety of perspectives
Balance out competing interests
Give more than just your opinion (moral reaction)
REASONS NEEDED
Any questions?
Topic Content (not fully listed) Challenges
2 - 4 Career options Professionalism English language Academic honesty Legal practice different in Pacific – smaller, less developed, less technology, less mentoring Culture poses challenges for practice
5 Perspectives on law Adoption as law story More than the lawyers’ view Limit of reach of state, usefulness of state law
6 Differences in morality, ethics and law Theories of justice Culture, custom affect perspectives on ethics and view of justice
7 Sources of law Who makes law Plural legal sources Parliament often does not function as it maybe should Courts face difficult challenges in weighing up competing interests
8 Abortion case study Context affects content of law May not be any clear way to weigh up competing reasoning
Theorists ‘tend to conceptualise law and custom in terms of opposition of normative structures’
MD Olson, ‘The Politics and poetics of social transformation in Samoa’ (2000) 45 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 19, 19
Why?
State law as a colonial legacy?
Modern/foreign vs custom/local
‘the Vanuatu state legal system finds itself in a dichotomous position in relation to “introduced” law and indigenous practices, beliefs and expectations.’
Benedicta Rousseau, ‘“This is a Court of Law, Not a Court of Morality”: Kastom and custom in Vanuatu state courts’ (2008) 12(2) Journal of South Pacific Law 15, 15.
‘problem is that many ni-Vanuatu see the court system as being a foreign system. The general distrust and lack of ownership of the system are illustrated by the fact that many people refer to the courts as ‘kot blong waetman’ (white man’s court).’
Miranda Forsyth, A Bird that Flies with Two Wings: The kastom and state justice systems in Vanuatu (2009), Chapter 5 http://epress.anu.edu.au/kastom/html/frames.php (Accessed 1 February 2011)).
between traditional ideas and Christian teaching, as to what is right and wrong, or fair, or just
between group-based and individual-oriented societies as to notions of responsibility
between unwritten customs and written statutes – as to both the way they are expressed and the content of what they say
between the authority of local chiefs, elders and councils, and that of the courts and agencies of central (and regional) governments, often called upon to deal with the same matter
between courts dealing once-and-for-all with the particular act or offence in isolation, and traditional processes which address the wider context of disputes, often without attempting to achieve finality
between customary manners and methods of communicating, and formal court procedures
between local attitudes to statements which are accepted as proof of facts, and strict rules of evidence such as the exclusion of hearsay and the burden and standard of proof
between the different backgrounds and training of personnel, such as adjudicators and lawyers, within the same jurisdiction
and between the function of the court as the arbiter of isolated breaches and disputes and its function as an agent of social or government policy – to mention only some.’
Write an essay explaining why difficulties in Pacific legal systems arise because of differences 'between customary manners and methods of communicating, and formal court procedures.' (Powles' 6th point)
What sections should your essay contain?
What other things should you make sure your essay displays? (for example good English)
How can you generate ideas?
How should you select ideas?
Check Feedback 3 when you have completed these questions
How should you structure your arguments?
Local lawyers more used to customary ways of communicating might not follow/understand court ways
Challenges for lawyers to separate from their cultural ties
Language barrier
Responsibility of community to resolve, rather than individual responsibility of judge in court
Rural areas, prefer cultural identity to law (might not recognise law as authoritative at all?)
Customary law not written, difficulties with records et cet. that state law prefers
Hard to achieve justice when elder/chiefs make decisions as no certain laws/external standards of justice
Clearly define subject
Brainstorm
Select key ideas
Put ideas into order
Write individual paragraphs
Add an introduction and conclusion
Edit
Etzioni, Amitai, ‘Law in Civil Society, Good Society and the Prescriptive State’ (2000) 75(2) Chicago Kent Law Review 355.
Civil society
Good society
Prescriptive society
Philosophical foundations
Basic role of law
Place of citizens
Virtues
Achieved/ascribed relations (voluntariness of relations)
Rights, responsibilities, duties
Philosophical foundations
Civil: liberal; values largely a private decision
Good: communitarian; shared values from public consensus
Prescriptive: socially conservative; imposed by State
Basic role of law
C: minimal role; procedural; protection of equality
G: minimal role; social control more important
P: State laws and enforcement important
Place of citizens
C: active role in following public affairs, voting
G: membership more important than citizenship
P: involuntary, to obey/follow duties
Virtues
C: moderation, tolerance, self control, critical thinking, participation in civil affairs
G: good community members
P: Obeys
Achieved/ascribed relations (voluntariness of relations)
C: voluntary
G: ascribed
P: state derived
Rights, responsibilities, duties
C: rights
G: responsibilities
P: duties
Which type of society does your “traditional society” most reflect?
Probably good society
Which type of society does your contemporary society most reflect?
Probably combination of good and civil?
Which type of society does your legal/political system most reflect?
Constitutions reflect civil society, with laws containing some prescriptive elements
Differences in underlying values reduce familiarity, and may reduce acceptance/perception of legitimacy
Do not fit cultural context
Being passed by bodies that are not respected
No realistic means of enforcement
Misguided belief that if there is a problem passing a law will fix it
Things looks good on paper – and maybe get donor/NGO/media approval – but are, in practice, useless
Independence is ‘a matter of international law, rather than empirical reality. Post-colonial international relationships… [are determined by] the enduring realities of smallness, remoteness, limited resources and the longstanding interests of larger countries.’
Barrie MacDonald ‘Decolonisation and beyond’ (1986) 21(3) Journal of Pacific History 115, 115.
Aid donors
Multi-lateral lending agencies
UN agencies
Pacific Forum……
A TOOL FOR STRUCTURED BRAINSTORMING HELPS TO LOOK AT ISSUES HOLISTICALLY
THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND INDIVIDUAL LAWS WITHIN IT, SHOULD BE:
Responsive
Understood
Fair
Effective
Appropriate
Available
Standards overlap/interrelate
Powles links standards to particular aspects of legal system
law should be responsive and understood;
dispute resolution should be fair and effective; and
legal services should be appropriate and available.
When using the standards as a framework for analysing weaknesses in the law YOU DO NOT HAVE TO link standards to particular aspects
ALL aspects of the legal system and laws within it must be responsive, understood, fair, effective, appropriate and available.
THE ISSUE: In custom giving of gifts or exchange of items is expected. This is often used as a justification for paying voters during election time.
A brainstorming exercise
After brainstorming then develop ideas with research
Minimum standards
give you structure for brainstorming
Help you look broadly at issues
Make sure that you do not just focus on one particular aspect
Standard Problems with getting people to follow bribery law Possible solutions to address problems
Responsive
Understood
Fair
Effective
Available
Appropriate
Standard Problems with getting people to follow bribery law Possible solutions to address problems
Responsive
It is customary for pacific countries to give – conflict between law and custom
Understood
Depends on society context and circumstances Most of population rural – do not understand language or concept Rural has expectation of being given donations
Fair
Societal context might think bribery is fair Elections are not a place where gift giving should be fair Not fair – gift changing is respect, but some people take improperly and spoil custom
Effective
Not being enforced Only being enforced during elections – bribery happens other times Depends on strength of enforcing agency
Available
No legal enforcers/police Enforcers susceptible to being bribed
Appropriate
Is law is appropriate in concept? Allows people who don’t have the wealth to donate to participate
We will look at:
The nature and historical development of customary law, both in England and in the South Pacific;
The importance, status and role of customary law in this region;
How customary law interacts with other sources of law in the South Pacific; and
Explain the problematic relationship between customary law and common law, both being parts of pluralist legal systems.
Next week
Thank you and…
Week 9
01/05/2025
Dr PK Tiwari
See you next week!l