soc chapter 7-9
Sociology of Deviance
Chapter 7
Social Control Theory
Influenced by Beccaria, a classical criminology theorist
We are rational actors who weigh the costs and benefits of our decisions
The assumption that people are antisocial
That if people could people would act deviant
Not trying to understand deviance but trying to understand compliance
Criquite: recognizes that people don’t regularly think of free will and weighs the costs and benefits
Internal control: rules that come from our conscious
External control: society places these rules to keep us from engaging in deviance
Development of Social Control Theory: Nye
First cluster: internalized control
Every society tries to give, particularly, children the rules and norms of society, and that parallels the idea of building them a consciousness that would allow them to build behavior internally
If everybody had this Nye believed the other controls wouldn’t be needed
Second cluster: indirect control
An example would be expressing disapproval, only if they care about the person’s opinion
Third: direct control
Examples would be punishment and ostracizing
Final cluster: a reason to avoid deviant behaviors
“Stakes and Conformity-” things you are working towards that motivate you to comply with the norms and the laws
Hirschi Social Bonding Theory
The assumption is that everyone is deviant and if people are not deviant then it needs to explain how social bonds encourage conformity (our emotional bonds that make us care what they think of us)
Attachment-The most important attachment is parents, but also friends and teachers could keep us away from deviance (emotional)
Commitment- weighs the costs and benefits, a strong commitment to conventional society and something to lose, the more you have to lose the easier it is to be committed
Involvement- time people spend on conforming or pro-social activities
Belief- Your understanding of the rules and the norms, has a moral component
Power and Control Theory
Tries to understand the gender imbalance in deviance and crime
The nature of the power imbalance at home may contribute to the difference
Patriarchal attitudes- when the home is more patriarchal the boys are given more freedom and the girls are controlled to a greater extent
If the parents are equal, there tends to be the same level of control between the boys and girls and fewer gender differences in deviance
Gottfredson and Hirschi’s Theory of Self Control
Believes that behavior is influenced by maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain
What guides this balance of pleasure/pain is the level of self-control
If they have high self-control when they’re young they’ll have high self-control when they age
If people have low social control they are looking for immediate gratification, but delaying that gratification they are exercising self-control
Life Course Theory
Key transitions in life that help promote social bonds are major life-changing events/transitions
Carrer, marriage, parenting
Application of Social Control Theories
Family as a primary controlling agent of deviance
All families are not equal in the socialization of their children
Family process quality v.s. Structure
One-parent or two-parent households
Family quality could be discipline, attachment to the parent
Supervision-making sure the kids are going and doing well in school, that they have activities
Chapter 8
Symbolic interactionism
Focuses on miro-contexts and how people relate to each other in their day-to-day lives including the meanings we give to people, objects, and interactions
Concept: The looking-glass self
How we are shaped by the ways other people perceive us
We imagine how we appear to other people, and how they judge us, & our assessment of that judgment can either lead to pride or self-mortification
Loops back to the self-constructionist concept where deviance is what we make of it and it isn’t always evil
Development of Labeling Theory
Franklin Tannenbaum
He believed that our reaction to behavior can change the nature of said behavior
“Police contact can turn basic juvenile behavior into a dramatization of evil” which can lead to more deviance
Primary and secondary deviance
Primary- the initial act
Secondary- deviance a person commits in response to how they are treated/labeled (defensive act/self-fulfilling prophecy)
How The Labeling Process Works
Interactionist theory- people don’t have to stay on the path of deviance
3 ways to secondary deviance- It can encourage deviant subcultures, and it can affect how one perceives oneself, and make it harder to conform
A deviant master status- A thinking that you are better than all or most others that evokes a reaction. An example of a master status would be a sex offender.
Labeling and Mental Illness
Residual rule-breaking theory- not illegal behavior but it draws attention that makes people uncomfortable; not going along with the rules of polite society
Rosenhan’s study of “pseudopatients”
Labeling and Deliquenicy
Saints and roughnecks- they would be treated differently depending on their group
How deviance is seen depends on the status or wealth of the perpetrator
Application of Labeling Theory
Braithwaite- believed that our response should be reintegrative shaming- “hate the sin, not the sinner”
Restorative justice- taking responsibility for their actions, acknowledging your harm, and making amends
Mental health/drug courts- the judge has the role of being a support mechanism by problem-solving and separating the behavior from the person
Chapter 9
Marxist and Conflict Theories of Deviance
Both are related but Marxism focuses on the economic perspective
Development of Marxist Theory
Both Marxist and conflict theories highlight conflict in society, and conflict exists because of differences in power
Both also focus on structural factors of the process of labeling and responding to theories
Two key ways they are different- what the sources of power are
Marxism is focused on capitalism
Marxism
Although he didn’t practice crim, soc, or psych he is known in the psych world as a key theorist
Foundational theory-society has conflict, inequality, and power differentials
Marx thought people should think- how do people relate to each?
For the most part, laborers accept their positions but they are workers, one way laborers can gain more power is by increasing wages
Marxist Philosophy
Dialectical Materialism: Basis of Marxist Philosophy
We have to focus on the material conditions of the worlds
Where reality exists or something concrete, not religion or the spiritual world
Negotiation of contradictions- helps us shape a new reality
Thesis, antithesis, and synthesis of an idea
Once people come to a synthesis it's almost like a new starting point or evolution
Marxism, Law, and Deviance
Importance of the law
A tool to support capitalism
Function of the law
One function of the law is to make it look like we’re equal, b/c we are on paper but in practice
Bonger’s Idea
Economic crime is expected in a capitalistic system
Business owners will dominate and take advantage of people
His solution was a redistribution of wealth
Spitzer's theory of deviance
Advanced capitalism- he believed capitalism would become more efficient and that there would be a new labor class
More people would become educated and then in that process they might start to become critical of capitalism
Problem populations:
Social junk- workers you don’t need anymore
Social dynamite- workers that become critical of the system
False consciousness
The idea that the laborers aren’t aware they’re being exploited
Development of Conflict Theory
Legislation of morality
Laws against homelessness, panhandling
Instrumental function of the law
Tells us what is and isn’t illgeal
Symbolic function of law
There to send us a message of right and wrong behaviors or people
Vold
Group conflict- confclit is inevtiable because of differences in power
The creation and maintenance of the group- it is human nature to crave acceptance so group behavior can be a way to know that we belong
The use of the law- gives powerful groups more control in society
Turk
The law is a resource and its a difficult resource to control
The actual enforcement of the law is more likely when it is targetted towards less powerful groups