RR

AP Literature Exam Six-Day Prep Plan

Timeline & Mindset

  • The AP Literature & Composition exam is exactly 6 days away (according to the speaker’s time-stamp).
  • Distinction the author makes: “You don’t need to study for the AP Lit exam, but you do need to prep for it.”
    • Implies that rote memorization of massive content isn’t as useful as targeted strategic preparation.
    • Focus on skills (analysis, argumentation, close reading) rather than cramming facts.

Core Pillars of the 6-Day Plan

  1. Memorize Key Literary & Poetic Devices
  2. Prepare for the Literary Argument Essay (Q3)
  3. Refresh 3 “Books of Literary Merit” in Depth
  4. Practice Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs)

1. Memorizing Literary & Poetic Devices

  • Purpose: Devices function as analytical “tool-belt” items you can quickly spot and discuss in both prose and poetry passages.
  • Action Steps:
    • Open an online resource (e.g.
    • Quizlet sets titled “AP Lit Literary Devices,” “Poetic Terms,” etc.).
    • Cherry-pick a personal shortlist of devices you continually notice in class readings; the speaker implies you don’t need the full glossary, just reliable go-tos.
  • Recommended Device Categories (examples):
    • Figurative Language: metaphor, simile, personification, synecdoche, metonymy.
    • Sound Devices: alliteration, assonance, consonance, cacophony/euphony, onomatopoeia.
    • Form & Structure: enjambment, caesura, anaphora, epistrophe, parallelism, juxtaposition.
    • Narrative Techniques: stream of consciousness, unreliable narrator, frame narrative.
    • Irony & Tone Shifters: dramatic irony, situational irony, verbal irony, understatement.
  • Goal: Be able to (a) recognize them instantly and (b) articulate how they contribute to meaning/theme.

2. Preparing for the Argument Essay (Free-Response Question 3)

  • Task Summary:
    • You will receive an open prompt (e.g. “Choose a novel or play in which X occurs and write an essay …”).
    • You must craft a line of reasoning supported by textual evidence from a work of “literary merit.”
  • Why Depth > Breadth:
    • Deep familiarity with ~3 texts ensures you can adapt to almost any thematic angle (identity, power, morality, societal critique, etc.).
    • Surface knowledge of 10 books often yields shallow, derivative essays; focus enables specificity (quotes, nuanced analysis).
  • Speaker’s Personal Picks:
    1. Frankenstein (Mary Shelley)
    2. The Poisonwood Bible (Barbara Kingsolver)
    3. Brave New World (Aldous Huxley)
    • Rationale: All three offer rich themes (creation & responsibility, colonialism & religion, dystopian control) and complex characters, meeting College Board’s “literary merit” standard.
  • Action Items:
    • Reread or skim annotated chapters focusing on key scenes.
    • Identify versatile themes (e.g. Frankenstein: ambition, isolation, nature vs. nurture).
    • Memorize at least 2 concise, high-impact quotations per theme.
    • Plan thesis templates you can tweak on exam day. Example:
      > “In \textit{Frankenstein}, Mary Shelley employs [device/technique] to reveal that …”

3. Creating Mind Maps for Each Text

  • Purpose: Visual condensation of an entire novel/play into a single glance.
  • Recommended Branches:
    • Themes/Motifs
    • Characters & Arcs
    • Key Plot Points
    • Setting & Atmosphere
    • Symbolism & Recurring Images
    • 2–3 Quotations (with page numbers if possible)
  • Practical Tips:
    • Color-code themes vs. symbols.
    • Use arrows to connect related motifs and character decisions.
    • Keep mind map visible in study space for quick “refresh” sessions.

4. Practicing Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs)

  • The MCQ section = 45% of composite score (per recent exam structure).
  • Sources for Practice:
    • Official AP Classroom progress checks (ask teacher to unlock).
    • Released exams (e.g. 1999, 2012, 2016 sample sets).
    • Commercial prep books (Princeton Review, Barron’s) – focus on newest editions for alignment with current style.
  • Strategy:
    • Time yourself: 55 questions in 60 minutes ≈ \frac{60}{55} \approx 1.09 minutes per question.
    • After each set, annotate why distractors are wrong; convert tricky items into flashcards.

Integrated Study Schedule (Example)

Day -6

  • Build/refresh mind map #1 (Frankenstein).
  • Memorize 5 devices (Quizlet).

Day -5

  • Mind map #2 (Poisonwood Bible).
  • MCQ set 1 (passage-based, 15 Qs).

Day -4

  • Mind map #3 (Brave New World).
  • Draft mock Q3 thesis + outline for a random released prompt.

Day -3

  • Full MCQ set (20–25 Qs) under timed conditions.
  • Review wrong answers; add unfamiliar devices to list.

Day -2

  • Write a full timed Q3 essay (40 minutes).
  • Self or peer score using College Board rubric (0–6).

Day -1

  • Rapid review: read through quotations, devices, and all three mind maps.
  • Light MCQ warm-up (10 Qs).

Exam Morning

  • Skim device list; visualize mind maps.
  • Trust preparation; manage pacing.

Additional Tips & Connections

  • Ethical Dimension: Avoid over-reliance on formulaic “five-paragraph” structures; aim for nuanced interpretations that respect textual complexity.
  • Real-World Parallel: Skills practiced (close reading, evidence-based argument) mirror college-level literary analysis and even professional editorial work.
  • Connection to Prior Coursework:
    • Devices & close reading echo AP Lang rhetorical analysis but applied to imaginative literature.
    • MCQ practice similar to SAT reading but with denser, older texts.

Quick-Reference Device Cheat Sheet

  • Anaphora: repetition at beginnings of clauses (emphasizes urgency).
  • Caesura: mid-line pause in poetry (creates tension or natural speech rhythm).
  • Chiasmus: inverted parallelism (ABBA structure) to highlight contrast.
  • Metonymy vs. Synecdoche: part-for-whole semantics (clarify which is used).
  • Asyndeton/Polysyndeton: omission vs. proliferation of conjunctions (affects pacing).
  • Juxtaposition: placing unlike ideas side by side (spotlight differences).

Final Encouragement

  • The speaker scored a top-score 5 using precisely this condensed plan.
  • Key mantra: “Exposure to exam style + depth on a few texts = success.”
  • Comment section call-to-action: audience invited to request guidance on other AP exams.