To analyze economic inequality, it is essential to define various measures commonly used to compare individuals and groups regarding economic affluence.
Society can be generally categorized into three social classes:
Can be subdivided into:
Upper Upper Class: Wealth comes from inheritance, significant generational wealth.
Lower Upper Class: Wealth is often recent, with individuals having greater income but potentially less intergenerational wealth.
Disproportionately holds a substantial portion of income and wealth.
Characterized by spending patterns on arts, science, and education.
Invest more time with children, which influences upward mobility.
Consists of individuals with moderate income levels, often striving for stability and progression.
Comprises individuals particularly vulnerable to economic changes and crises.
Often referred to as:
Working Class: Engaged in lower-wage jobs, facing more economic instability.
Lower Middle Class: Also categorized as working class; lack substantial savings, making them more susceptible to economic downturns.
They typically have lower levels of educational attainment and cultural capital.
The lower class is significantly impacted by:
Economic crises and political instability.
Limited access to resources and opportunities that facilitate higher education.
First-generation college students are less likely to pursue higher education due to economic constraints.
Income: Refers to earnings from employment or self-employment.
Wealth: Accumulated resources from previous generations, considered potential marketable assets minus debts.
Poverty Threshold: Varies by country and is contextually significant; in the U.S., approximately 38 million live below the threshold of $28,000 (as of 2021).
Poverty thresholds differ globally and can vary within the same country.
Understanding the economic landscape requires careful analysis of statistics and context; policymakers often lack precise data for effective social measures.
Investigating the relationship between gross national income and life expectancy reveals:
Wealthier countries (e.g., Norway, USA) do not significantly leverage improved life expectancies compared to countries with lower income.
There is no consistent relationship between wealth and health outcomes on a national scale.
Within societies, however, remarkable disparities exist in health outcomes correlated with socioeconomic status.
Economic ideals often reference perfect equality, which is contextually unrealistic.
Inequality has social consequences, with historical perspectives indicating it as divisive and corrosive to social cohesion.
It's essential to evaluate societies with significant income inequality, as they often suffer from systemic social issues that impact overall welfare.