No specific reading assigned, but lecture content covers important topics related to human evolution.
Lecture will be recorded and shared for those who missed it.
Writing assignment number three is distributed; worth 10 points.
Recommended reading: Wong’s Scientific American article on human dietary evolution.
Article ties together previous discussions and serves as good reinforcement.
Essay style assignment due by noon during finals week; gives students ample time to complete.
Encourage students to consult with the teacher or TA regarding questions on the assignment.
Extra time will be allotted for quizzes.
Final exam will include written notes, no electronic devices allowed.
Study guide for the final exam to be provided by Monday.
Cumulative final exam with 45 questions covering all 10 weeks of the course.
Noted that agriculture and domestication occurred during the Holocene, approximately 12,000 years ago.
Holocene: Period characterized by environmental warming following the last glacial period.
Small, closely-knit groups; social structure differs greatly from agricultural societies.
Example of the Ache hunter-gatherers used to show kinship dynamics:
High fraction of individuals are closely related (primary kin and spouses).
Relatively low population density, necessitating distance between groups due to mobile foraging lifestyle.
Social structure not parallel to that found in other primate species.
Agricultural groups typically have larger, more diverse populations.
Transition to sedentary lifestyles leads to unprecedented population growth and complexity compared to hunter-gatherers.
Archaeological evidence shows higher genetic diversity and population sizes associated with agriculturalist lineages.
Historical context of population dynamics post-agriculture adoption:
Sub-Saharan Africa saw rapid agricultural population growth around 5,000 years ago, while hunter-gatherer groups remained stable in size.
European agricultural groups displayed slower growth initially, but overtook hunter-gatherers in population size over time.
Adaptations such as lactase enzyme production as a case study of gene-culture interactions.
Lactase persistence influenced by single MCM6/lactase gene with multiple mutations across different global populations.
Distribution of lactase persistence alleles linked to pastoralism and geography (e.g., higher rates in Northern Europeans).
Evidence of lactase persistence in populations dependent on sheep, cattle, or goats for milk.
Multiple hypotheses explain benefits of milk consumption in early Holocene populations:
Nutritional Density: Milk is calorie-rich and high in fats.
Pathogen Exposure: Increased population density leads to higher exposure to pathogens, making milk consumption beneficial.
Famine Resistance: Availability of milk mitigates risks of malnutrition during famines.
Data shows that settlements associated with agriculture see significant increases in lactase persistence over generations.
Ancient DNA studies show mutations associated with lactase persisted, correlating with agricultural innovations.
Disparities noted between the introduction of agriculture and the rise of lactase persistence alleles in populations.
Archaeological findings visualize the spread of agriculture and the corresponding rise in lactase persistence across Europe.
Research by Sarah Tishkoff on lactase persistence in Eastern African populations, differentiating between those who can digest lactose versus those who cannot.
Genetic diversity studies demonstrate a mixture of lactase traits in various groups, highlighting the complex history of human dietary adaptation.
Identical haplotypes observed in lactase persistence make parallels between ancestral populations and their adaptations noteworthy.