Title: Module 2.7 Forgetting and Other Memory Challenges
Authors: Ruben Avalos, Jayson Palanca, Emiliano Luna
2.7-1: Explain why we forget.
2.7-2: Discuss the influence of misinformation, imagination, and source amnesia on memory construction.
2.7-3: Assess the reliability of children's eyewitness descriptions.
2.7-4: Apply memory research findings to improve performance in academic settings.
Forgetting unimportant information is beneficial; it helps prioritize what matters.
Forgetting outdated or negative memories is crucial for mental well-being.
Some individuals exhibit Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM), leading to overwhelming retention of trivial details.
Case Example: Jill Price, whose extraordinary memory hinders rather than helps her.
Case Study: Henry Molaison (H.M.)
Underwent hippocampus removal to alleviate seizures.
Experienced Anterograde Amnesia: inability to form new memories.
Experienced Retrograde Amnesia: inability to recall past information.
Despite amnesia, preserved nonverbal learning ability via automatic processing.
Forgetting can occur at various memory stages:
Sensory Memory: Brief, detailed sensory registrations.
Working/Short-Term Memory: Limited capacity for items that are noticed and encoded.
Long-Term Storage: Information may be altered or lost.
Retrieval: Affected by interference, retrieval cues, moods, and motives.
Encoding Failure: Much sensory input is unnoticed; what isn't encoded is never remembered.
Displacement: New information replaces old in short-term memory.
Age can impact encoding efficiency.
Storage Decay: Information may be forgotten over time even if originally encoded effectively.
Ebbinghaus's Forgetting Curve: Shows rapid initial memory loss, plateauing over time.
Retrieval Failure: Information is stored but inaccessible.
Tip of the Tongue Phenomenon: Inability to recall stored information, often aided by retrieval cues.
Proactive Interference: Prior knowledge disrupts new learning.
Example: Difficulty remembering a new phone number due to an old number.
Retroactive Interference: New information hinders recall of old information.
Example: Forgetting an old phone number post-memorizing a new one.
Positive Transfer: Previous knowledge aiding the learning of new information.
Example: Learning French is easier for those who know Latin.
Freud's theory of repression: Individuals may block anxiety-inducing memories from consciousness.
Counterpoint: Modern research indicates repression is rare; trauma often leads to vivid, persistent memories.
Study on passengers' memories of a near-crash indicated strong, vivid memories rather than repression.
Suggests trauma may enhance memory accuracy.
Constructive Nature of Memory: Memories are not merely retrieved but reconstructed with influences from later experiences and expectations.
Misinformation Effect: Corruption of memory from misleading post-event information.
Case Study: Loftus and Palmer (1974) explored how different verb usages influenced eyewitness speed estimates.
Imagination Inflation: Imagining events, even fictional, can lead to increased confidence in their occurrence.
Example: After imagining a hot-air balloon ride, many falsely recall it vividly.
Defined as the inability to remember the origin of information leading to misattribution of memories.
Example: Confusing firsthand accounts with secondhand information.
DĂ©jĂ Vu: Feeling of familiarity in new situations caused by processing errors in the brain.
False Memories: Persistent and convincingly real, often created through vivid imagination.
Instances where children recall fake events from altered photos; socially contagious through discussions and suggestions.
Implications in legal settings: 40% wrongful convictions result from eyewitness misidentification.
False memories can be indistinguishable from true ones due to reconstructive processes.
Filling in gaps with assumptions can create vivid, false memories.
Children are highly susceptible to suggestion, which can distort their memories.
Study on Anatomically Correct Dolls: 55% of children pointed to inappropriate areas despite no examination occurring.
Suggestive questioning led to false recall in preschoolers over 10 weeks of questioning.
Ethical implications for court cases reliant on children’s testimonies.
Controversy surrounds recovered memories, especially in abuse cases due to potential for false memories.
Genuine survivors may be doubted; innocent individuals could be wrongly accused.
Influence of therapeutic techniques can create false memories; caution advised by professionals.
Eyewitness and repressed memories can significantly affect the justice system, potentially leading to wrongful convictions.
Mental health professionals urged to avoid suggestive techniques to prevent memory inaccuracies.
Educated vigilance regarding cognitive biases is essential for critical thinking in judicial and educational settings.
Effective Strategies:
Rehearse repeatedly across multiple sessions.
Connect new information with existing knowledge.
Activate retrieval cues by recreating the learning context.
Use mnemonic devices for better retention.
Avoid similar topic studies back-to-back to reduce interference.
Ensure adequate sleep for optimal memory consolidation.
Engage in regular self-testing and retrieval practice.