cultures of central + south america
took place within 3 civilizations (AD 300-800)
mayans built cities in yucatan peninsula (modern belize, guatemala, southern mexico)
aztecs took over after mayans + built tenochtitlan, dominated mexico + central america
incas located in peru took over south america
TL;DR: south american cultures took place (mayans in belize, guatemala, southern mexico, aztecs in mexico + central america after mayans, incas SA) from 300-800 AD across south america, central america, mexico
cultures of north america
populations ranged from <1 mil-more than 10 mil
smaller bc maize spread slower than it did in mexico
mostly lived in settlements
men = make tools + hunt, women = gather plants, grow crops (maize, beans, tobacco)
languages
algonquian in NE, siouan in GP, athabaskan in SW
sw settlements
hokokam, anasazi, pueblos located here
lived in large groups before europeans came
nw settlements
located from alaska → norcal
hunting + gathering, v isolated
great plains
hunters, farming + trading
raised their own crops + traded
got horses in 17th cen. by trading + stealing
farming → hunting
mw settlements
tons of food = prosperity
hunting, fishing, agriculture
ne settlements
ohio valley → ny state
seneca, cayuga, onondaga, oneida, mohawk
powerful, battled rivals + europeans
atlantic seaboard settlements
nj → fl
rivers + oceans = food
TL;DR: large populations, but not as large as SA bc slow spread of maize, lived in settlements, tribes all over the place w/ various langs
european exploration
columbus voyages = europeans to NA
cause 1: improvements in tech
renaissance in 15th + 16th cens.
gunpowder + sailing compass used (inv. by chinese)
improved in shipbuilding + mapmaking
printing press = knowledge spread (europe)
cause 2: religious conflicts
moors (muslim) took over spain, spanish christians took it back + made it roman catholic
catholics v. protestants = both desire to go to NA to spread religion
TL;DR: columbus voyages to NA, renaissance = improvements in tech + religious conflicts = desire to go to NA
expanding trade
desire to trade to even more places (europeans)
new routes
sail so. along w. africa coast → e. china OR sail w. across atl. ocean
south + east = shortest route
set up voyages to explore while columbus thought he got to india (he didn’t)
slave trading
enslaved ppl captured in wars
portugese traded for slaves in w. africa (15th cen.)
used slaves for sugar plantations
very profitable, used it in americas
african resistance
resisted slavery however possible
thousands of miles away from home, but ran, sabotaged work, revolted
kept african culture alive while they were away from home
TL;DR: europeans desire to trade more, created voyages to trade w/ asia, used enslaved ppl for money (portugese mostly), brought it to NA, african ppl resisted slavery + kept culture
early explorations
economy + politics + social conditions in europe = christopher columbus
christopher columbus
8 years LF $ support
sailing west (europe → “indies”)
isabella + ferdinand (spain) gave columbus 3 ships + ton of power (1492)
canary islands → bahamas (oct 6-12, 1492)
cool in spain, but didn’t get much
columbus legacy
died in 1506 thinking he found his route to asia (he didn’t)
spaniards didn’t like columbus bc he found a “new world”
people don’t like that he named the people he found “indians”
land named for amerigo vespucci
injustices faced by native americans post-european colonization
perm. interaction btwn world
exchanges
euro + native american cultures = very different
contact resulted in columbian exchange
columbian exchange = plants, animals, germs across atl. ocean
europeans learned abt corn, sweet + white potatoes, tomatoes, tobacco
got syphilis too (ruh roh shaggy)
europeans brought sugarcane, bluegrasses, pigs, horses, the wheel, iron implements, germs
smallpox + measles = death
death rate in the millions, wiped out lots of tribal communities
dividing the americas
spain + portugal first to get territory in americas
claims → disputes
pope = mediator, created line of demarcation, gave spain west of line, portugal east (1493)
spain + portugal moved line a bit more west, signed treaty of torsedillas (1494)
line gave portugal brazil, spain rest of the americas
spanish exploration + conquest
spain gave power to expand to conquistadores (explorers + conquerors)
various trips gave spain power in the americas
ships loaded w/ gold + silver from mexico + peru → spain
increased gold supply by more than 500%, richest + most powerful nation in europe
got others to come to americas for gold + power
encomienda system = king giving ppl land + natives
indians forced to farm + work in mines
rewards given to masters, “took care” of them
diseases + brutality wiped out natives
slavery started w/ asiento system
required to pay taxes on each slave brought to americas
english claims
john cabot → newfoundland (1497)
not much exploration happened, too busy w/ other issues
exploration that was attempted failed
french claims
started exploring in 1524 w/ giovanni da verazanno (italian explorer)
explored part of NA e. coast
also got land from jacques cartier (1534-1542)
kind of busy w/ other issues, like english
est. first claim by samuel de champlain - quebec (1608)
next major claim by louis jalliet + fr. jacques marquette - upper miss. river (1673)
louisiana founded by robert de la salle (1682)
dutch claims
netherlands sponsored voyages to americas (1600s)
henry hudson sailed to hudson river, established dutch claims (1609)
became new amsterdam, then NY
gave dutch west india co. the right to control the region (economy benefits)
TL;DR: christopher columbus found the new world, leading to columbian exchange (trade btwn. europe + NA), killing millions of various tribal communities, spain became richest nation (european) + started slavery, leading to england, france, and the netherlands coming to colonize the americas
spanish settlements in north america
spanish created various settlements in NA, but slow dev.
lack of minerals + resistance from native americans
florida
failed a lot + resistance from native americans there
established st. augustine (oldest city in USA founded by europeans) in 1565
new mexico
santa fe est. capital (1610)
tried to christianize native americans → pueblo ppl revolt (1680)
spanish sent away until 1692
texas
est. settlements btwn FL + NM
settlements grew (early 1700s)
spain resisted french exploring lower miss. river
california
started bc russians were exploring alaska
est. perm. settlements in san diego (1769) + san fransisco (1776)
members of fransiscan order = missions + settlements
fr. junipero serra founded 9 missions
TL;DR: spanish created various settlements all over the place, but slow dev. from lack of minerals + resistance from NA; created settlements in florida (1565), new mexico (1610), texas (early 1700s), + california (1769)
european treatment of native americans
europeans didn’t like NAs
viewed as inferior, exploitable, converted to christianity, military allies
various approaches used to control + operate colonies
spanish policy
settled in mexico + peru, found aztec + inca empires
diseases killed most natives, but ppl in empires could be laborers for the spanish
many died from either disease(s) or forced labor
explorers + soldiers married natives + africans
africans were captured + taken to provide slave labor for spanish colonists
class system dominated by “pure-blooded” spaniards
bartolome de las casas
disagreed w/ views pf europeans abt NAs
owned land + slaves in west indies, fought in wars against indians
became advocate for better treatment of indians
advocated for new laws of 1542 - ended indian slavery, halted any forced indian labor, started the end of the encomienda system
other ppl got king to repeal parts of new laws
valladolid debate
large debate over indians in spanish colonies took place in valladolid (spain, 1550-1551)
las casas said that slavery wasn’t justified bc indians were human + morally equal
juan gines de sepulveda argued that they benefitted the system, so he won the argument
english policy
settled in areas w/o large native empires
english colonists came in families, native marriage less common
massachusetts = english + native coexistence for a while
english viewed native american culture as savage
english took more and more land, expelled natives
french policy
french LF furs + catholic converts
native americans = economic + military allies
good relations, built trading posts along st. lawrence valley, great lakes region, miss. river
french goods → beaver pelts + furs from native americans
less threat to natives, helped huron ppl fight iroquois
native american reaction
na tribes = distinct groups
no concern of unified response from settlers
european goods = motivation to interact
after mass death, they needed new ways to survive
some tribes allied w/ settlers
past the point of return for life pre-settlers
TL;DR: europeans really didn’t like NAs, treated them poorly, spanish killed many + found laborers from empires + africans, english coexisted w/ NAs until they were expelled, french helped ppl fight iroquois + allied w them, european goods = reason to interact, some alliances w/ settlers, but past the point of return for life pre-settlers