Apply understanding of placebo to interpret research outcomes.
Explore the importance of placebo in clinical practice.
Recognize and discuss the importance of the comparator in decisions about treatment effectiveness.
Interpret data from studies using different types of comparators.
Understanding Placebo
Definition: A sham substance designed to have no therapeutic value.
Origin: Placebo comes from Latin, meaning 'shall I please?'
An inert treatment that mimics the active one but has no physiological effects.
Placebo Response/Effect
Definition: A phenomenon where an otherwise worthless intervention in a study induces an improvement in the patient’s condition or perception of the condition.
This improvement may be due to the participant's expectation.
It represents the change in outcome that results from the treatment ritual.
Nocebo Effect
Definition: Latin for 'to harm'.
The opposite of the placebo effect, where a negative outcome occurs due to a belief that the intervention will cause harm.
Domains Affected by Placebo
Changes in self-reported outcomes, which are often the strongest effects:
Pain
Fatigue
Breathlessness
Quality of sleep
Self-reported function
Nausea
Changes in biomarkers:
CSF endorphins
Tremor in Parkinson's disease
Swelling after wisdom teeth extraction
Size of duodenal ulcers on endoscopy
Gastric motility
Reduction of bronchodilator effect by half when presented as a constrictor.
Weight loss when physical work is framed as exercise.
Factors Influencing the Placebo Effect
Dose-response relationship:
One placebo capsule is less effective than two.
Four times a day is better than two.
Larger capsules are more effective than smaller capsules.
Ritualistic elements:
Tablets with corners are perceived as more effective than round ones.
Tablets with colored contents are better than normal pills.
More expensive treatments are perceived to have a higher effect.
Injections are considered more effective than tablets.
Topical applications are preferred over pills.
Placebo acupuncture is better than a placebo tablet.
Acupuncture is perceived as most effective when provided by a Chinese practitioner.
Surgery often tops the list in perceived effectiveness.
Mechanisms of Action
Treatment expectation:
The more a patient thinks a treatment will help, the more it likely will.
Expectations of both the client and the therapist play a role.
If the control group experiences a nocebo effect, it can enhance the perceived difference.
Failed treatment or negative expectations can influence outcomes.
Research Design:
Studies should test whether a treatment provides benefits beyond the ritual of care.
All treatments have a placebo component.
Design studies to control for the placebo effect.
Differentiate between placebo intervention and placebo care.
Consider the role of nocebo.
Controlling for the Placebo Response
Patient blinding
Standardization between groups
Credibility of the sham treatment
Clinical environment
Equal attention and interaction
Ensuring the placebo isn't an active treatment
Checking for blinding at the end
Therapist blinding
Equal enthusiasm and engagement
Checking for blinding
To measures size of placebo effect in a study a 3 arm trial is needed
Clinical Practice Implications
The placebo effect is real and can lead to significant changes.
It is an inescapable part of care.
Clients can benefit from optimizing non-specific effects.
It is never okay to apply nonsense treatments.
It is important to be trustworthy and competent.
Give adequate attention.
Examine thoroughly.
Explore patients' views and legitimize concerns.
Reassure and explain.
Take time with patients.
Therapist's Attitude and Clinical Outcome
Study on lumbar facet joint injections:
Patients in the experimental group (EG) had a conversation with the radiologist and were shown images after the injection.
The control group (CG) left the clinic without further contact.
The EG showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at 1 week and 1 month post-treatment, but no significant differences at 3 and 6 months.
Nocebo in Clinical Practice and Research
Adverse events or outcomes related to negative expectations or anticipations/beliefs.
Can occur through:
Priming via side-effects listing
Priming via expectation of pain
Language and words used
Diagnostic labeling
Clinician demeanor
Comparators in RCTs
Treatment effect needs to be interpreted considering the comparator.
The ideal control is a credible placebo.
Different comparators provide different information.
Types of Comparators
Sham (Placebo):
Should be inert with no discernible physiological effect.
Should be realistic, making the patient feel they are receiving care.
Clinicians should be blinded to which treatment is real.
Sham (Placebo) + Natural History:
Includes a natural history arm for additional comparisons.
Usual Care:
Compares a new treatment to what is already done.
Often done if not ethical to 'do nothing'.
Natural history not accounted for.
Can have unbalanced treatment.
Does not control for non-specific effects.
Natural History:
Treatment arm receives non-specific effects and any potential treatment effect.
Natural History group often sit on a waitlist.
Relevant for acute conditions or recurrent episodes.
Informs decisions about whether the benefits of treatment A are worth the costs, risks, and inconvenience beyond natural recovery.
Nocebo:
What if the comparator is harmful?
Key Concepts Summary
Different comparators in clinical trials provide different information.
Sham (placebo) is best, ideally with a natural history group as well.