Evidence Based Practice Flashcards
Placebo and Nocebo in Evidence-Based Practice
Objectives
- Introduce the concept of placebo.
- Apply understanding of placebo to interpret research outcomes.
- Explore the importance of placebo in clinical practice.
- Recognize and discuss the importance of the comparator in decisions about treatment effectiveness.
- Interpret data from studies using different types of comparators.
Understanding Placebo
- Definition: A sham substance designed to have no therapeutic value.
- Origin: Placebo comes from Latin, meaning 'shall I please?'
- An inert treatment that mimics the active one but has no physiological effects.
Placebo Response/Effect
- Definition: A phenomenon where an otherwise worthless intervention in a study induces an improvement in the patient’s condition or perception of the condition.
- This improvement may be due to the participant's expectation.
- It represents the change in outcome that results from the treatment ritual.
Nocebo Effect
- Definition: Latin for 'to harm'.
- The opposite of the placebo effect, where a negative outcome occurs due to a belief that the intervention will cause harm.
Domains Affected by Placebo
- Changes in self-reported outcomes, which are often the strongest effects:
- Pain
- Fatigue
- Breathlessness
- Quality of sleep
- Self-reported function
- Nausea
- Changes in biomarkers:
- CSF endorphins
- Tremor in Parkinson's disease
- Swelling after wisdom teeth extraction
- Size of duodenal ulcers on endoscopy
- Gastric motility
- Reduction of bronchodilator effect by half when presented as a constrictor.
- Weight loss when physical work is framed as exercise.
Factors Influencing the Placebo Effect
- Dose-response relationship:
- One placebo capsule is less effective than two.
- Four times a day is better than two.
- Larger capsules are more effective than smaller capsules.
- Ritualistic elements:
- Tablets with corners are perceived as more effective than round ones.
- Tablets with colored contents are better than normal pills.
- More expensive treatments are perceived to have a higher effect.
- Injections are considered more effective than tablets.
- Topical applications are preferred over pills.
- Placebo acupuncture is better than a placebo tablet.
- Acupuncture is perceived as most effective when provided by a Chinese practitioner.
- Surgery often tops the list in perceived effectiveness.
Mechanisms of Action
- Treatment expectation:
- The more a patient thinks a treatment will help, the more it likely will.
- Expectations of both the client and the therapist play a role.
- If the control group experiences a nocebo effect, it can enhance the perceived difference.
- Failed treatment or negative expectations can influence outcomes.
- Research Design:
- Studies should test whether a treatment provides benefits beyond the ritual of care.
- All treatments have a placebo component.
- Design studies to control for the placebo effect.
- Differentiate between placebo intervention and placebo care.
- Consider the role of nocebo.
Controlling for the Placebo Response
- Patient blinding
- Standardization between groups
- Credibility of the sham treatment
- Clinical environment
- Equal attention and interaction
- Ensuring the placebo isn't an active treatment
- Checking for blinding at the end
- Therapist blinding
- Equal enthusiasm and engagement
- Checking for blinding
- To measures size of placebo effect in a study a 3 arm trial is needed
Clinical Practice Implications
- The placebo effect is real and can lead to significant changes.
- It is an inescapable part of care.
- Clients can benefit from optimizing non-specific effects.
- It is never okay to apply nonsense treatments.
- It is important to be trustworthy and competent.
- Give adequate attention.
- Examine thoroughly.
- Explore patients' views and legitimize concerns.
- Reassure and explain.
- Take time with patients.
Therapist's Attitude and Clinical Outcome
- Study on lumbar facet joint injections:
- Patients in the experimental group (EG) had a conversation with the radiologist and were shown images after the injection.
- The control group (CG) left the clinic without further contact.
- The EG showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at 1 week and 1 month post-treatment, but no significant differences at 3 and 6 months.
Nocebo in Clinical Practice and Research
- Adverse events or outcomes related to negative expectations or anticipations/beliefs.
- Can occur through:
- Priming via side-effects listing
- Priming via expectation of pain
- Language and words used
- Diagnostic labeling
- Clinician demeanor
Comparators in RCTs
- Treatment effect needs to be interpreted considering the comparator.
- The ideal control is a credible placebo.
- Different comparators provide different information.
Types of Comparators
- Sham (Placebo):
- Should be inert with no discernible physiological effect.
- Should be realistic, making the patient feel they are receiving care.
- Clinicians should be blinded to which treatment is real.
- Sham (Placebo) + Natural History:
- Includes a natural history arm for additional comparisons.
- Usual Care:
- Compares a new treatment to what is already done.
- Often done if not ethical to 'do nothing'.
- Natural history not accounted for.
- Can have unbalanced treatment.
- Does not control for non-specific effects.
- Natural History:
- Treatment arm receives non-specific effects and any potential treatment effect.
- Natural History group often sit on a waitlist.
- Relevant for acute conditions or recurrent episodes.
- Informs decisions about whether the benefits of treatment A are worth the costs, risks, and inconvenience beyond natural recovery.
- Nocebo:
- What if the comparator is harmful?
Key Concepts Summary
- Different comparators in clinical trials provide different information.
- Sham (placebo) is best, ideally with a natural history group as well.
- Note the different things we learn from:
- Sham
- Usual care
- Natural History
- Nocebo