LH

Evidence Based Practice Flashcards

Placebo and Nocebo in Evidence-Based Practice

Objectives

  • Introduce the concept of placebo.
  • Apply understanding of placebo to interpret research outcomes.
  • Explore the importance of placebo in clinical practice.
  • Recognize and discuss the importance of the comparator in decisions about treatment effectiveness.
  • Interpret data from studies using different types of comparators.

Understanding Placebo

  • Definition: A sham substance designed to have no therapeutic value.
  • Origin: Placebo comes from Latin, meaning 'shall I please?'
  • An inert treatment that mimics the active one but has no physiological effects.

Placebo Response/Effect

  • Definition: A phenomenon where an otherwise worthless intervention in a study induces an improvement in the patient’s condition or perception of the condition.
  • This improvement may be due to the participant's expectation.
  • It represents the change in outcome that results from the treatment ritual.

Nocebo Effect

  • Definition: Latin for 'to harm'.
  • The opposite of the placebo effect, where a negative outcome occurs due to a belief that the intervention will cause harm.

Domains Affected by Placebo

  • Changes in self-reported outcomes, which are often the strongest effects:
    • Pain
    • Fatigue
    • Breathlessness
    • Quality of sleep
    • Self-reported function
    • Nausea
  • Changes in biomarkers:
    • CSF endorphins
    • Tremor in Parkinson's disease
    • Swelling after wisdom teeth extraction
    • Size of duodenal ulcers on endoscopy
    • Gastric motility
    • Reduction of bronchodilator effect by half when presented as a constrictor.
    • Weight loss when physical work is framed as exercise.

Factors Influencing the Placebo Effect

  • Dose-response relationship:
    • One placebo capsule is less effective than two.
    • Four times a day is better than two.
    • Larger capsules are more effective than smaller capsules.
  • Ritualistic elements:
    • Tablets with corners are perceived as more effective than round ones.
    • Tablets with colored contents are better than normal pills.
    • More expensive treatments are perceived to have a higher effect.
    • Injections are considered more effective than tablets.
    • Topical applications are preferred over pills.
    • Placebo acupuncture is better than a placebo tablet.
    • Acupuncture is perceived as most effective when provided by a Chinese practitioner.
    • Surgery often tops the list in perceived effectiveness.

Mechanisms of Action

  • Treatment expectation:
    • The more a patient thinks a treatment will help, the more it likely will.
    • Expectations of both the client and the therapist play a role.
    • If the control group experiences a nocebo effect, it can enhance the perceived difference.
    • Failed treatment or negative expectations can influence outcomes.
  • Research Design:
    • Studies should test whether a treatment provides benefits beyond the ritual of care.
    • All treatments have a placebo component.
    • Design studies to control for the placebo effect.
    • Differentiate between placebo intervention and placebo care.
    • Consider the role of nocebo.

Controlling for the Placebo Response

  • Patient blinding
  • Standardization between groups
  • Credibility of the sham treatment
  • Clinical environment
  • Equal attention and interaction
  • Ensuring the placebo isn't an active treatment
  • Checking for blinding at the end
  • Therapist blinding
  • Equal enthusiasm and engagement
  • Checking for blinding
  • To measures size of placebo effect in a study a 3 arm trial is needed

Clinical Practice Implications

  • The placebo effect is real and can lead to significant changes.
  • It is an inescapable part of care.
  • Clients can benefit from optimizing non-specific effects.
  • It is never okay to apply nonsense treatments.
  • It is important to be trustworthy and competent.
  • Give adequate attention.
  • Examine thoroughly.
  • Explore patients' views and legitimize concerns.
  • Reassure and explain.
  • Take time with patients.

Therapist's Attitude and Clinical Outcome

  • Study on lumbar facet joint injections:
    • Patients in the experimental group (EG) had a conversation with the radiologist and were shown images after the injection.
    • The control group (CG) left the clinic without further contact.
    • The EG showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at 1 week and 1 month post-treatment, but no significant differences at 3 and 6 months.

Nocebo in Clinical Practice and Research

  • Adverse events or outcomes related to negative expectations or anticipations/beliefs.
  • Can occur through:
    • Priming via side-effects listing
    • Priming via expectation of pain
    • Language and words used
    • Diagnostic labeling
    • Clinician demeanor

Comparators in RCTs

  • Treatment effect needs to be interpreted considering the comparator.
  • The ideal control is a credible placebo.
  • Different comparators provide different information.

Types of Comparators

  • Sham (Placebo):
    • Should be inert with no discernible physiological effect.
    • Should be realistic, making the patient feel they are receiving care.
    • Clinicians should be blinded to which treatment is real.
  • Sham (Placebo) + Natural History:
    • Includes a natural history arm for additional comparisons.
  • Usual Care:
    • Compares a new treatment to what is already done.
    • Often done if not ethical to 'do nothing'.
    • Natural history not accounted for.
    • Can have unbalanced treatment.
    • Does not control for non-specific effects.
  • Natural History:
    • Treatment arm receives non-specific effects and any potential treatment effect.
    • Natural History group often sit on a waitlist.
    • Relevant for acute conditions or recurrent episodes.
    • Informs decisions about whether the benefits of treatment A are worth the costs, risks, and inconvenience beyond natural recovery.
  • Nocebo:
    • What if the comparator is harmful?

Key Concepts Summary

  • Different comparators in clinical trials provide different information.
  • Sham (placebo) is best, ideally with a natural history group as well.
  • Note the different things we learn from:
    • Sham
    • Usual care
    • Natural History
    • Nocebo