Introduction To Forensic Psychology
What is Forensic Psychology?
- Narrow definitions
- Clinical practice in the legal system
- Only those who treat and asses patience in the legal system
- Broad definitions
- Research related to human behaviour and legal processes
- Practice of Psychology in the legal system
- “a field of psychology that deals with all aspects of human behaviour as it relates to the law or legal system”
Types of Forensic Psychologists
| (Experimental) Researcher | Clinician |
---|
Job may Include | Research | Research & practice |
---|
Area of Interest | Human behaviour & the law | Mental health issues & the law |
---|
Training | Graduate training in psychology & research on a forensic topic | Either an M.A. or a Ph.D. in psychology & internships |
---|
- Legal Scholar
- PhD in psychology and L.L.B. in Law
- Analyze mental health law
- Analyze legal movements
- Policy analysis and legislative consultation - Law-making
- Program at Simon Fraser University
Psychology & Law
- Psychology and the law
- The use of psychology to study the operation of the legal system (e.g., eyewitness lineups)
- Psychology in the law
- The use of psychology within the legal system as it currently operates (e.g., expert testimony)
- Psychology of the law
- The use of psychology to study the law itself
Brief History of Forensic Psychology
- Early Research
- McNaughten (1843) (appealing insanity)
- The attempted assassination of British Prime Minister Robert Peel instead killed his secretary
- Found not guilty because of insanity
- Established McNaughten rule
- Cattell (1895) (Eye-witness testimony with confidence)
- Questions about everyday observations
- Relationship between confidence and accuracy
- Binet (1900) (Children susceptible to leading questioning)
- Suggestibility in children
- Impact of Leading Questions
- Stern (1910) (reality being bent by high emotions witnesses)
- The eyewitness reality experiment
- Impact of emotional arousal
- Munsterberg (1908)
- Father of Forensic Psychology
- On The Witness Stand
- Pushed Psychology into the legal arena
- The Court
- State v. Driver (1921)
- First use of expert testimony
- Partial victory for Forensic Psychology
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
- Psychologists submitted a court brief outlining the detrimental effects of segregation
- U.S. Supreme Court referenced brief
- Jenkins v. United States (1962)
- Ruling that some psychologists are qualified to provide testimony
- When expert testimony goes wrong…
- Dale W. Griffis
- Expert witness in West Memphis 3 Case
- Three teenagers were wrongfully convicted of killing three boys
- Dr. Griffis:
- “The date of the killings, near a pagan holiday, was significant, as well as the fact that there was a full moon."
- “Also, the victims were all eight years old and eight is a witches' number.
- Admissibility of Expert Testimony: USA
- For forensic psychologists to provide testimony in court, they must meet certain criteria
- Frye v. United States (1923)
- Frye tried for Murder
- Polygraph exam passed
- Results inadmissible – not generally acceptable
- General Acceptance Test – very vague and causes confusion
- The testimony must be generally accepted within the field
- Daubert criteria
- Provided by a qualified expert
- Relevant
- Reliable/Valid
- Peer reviewed
- Testable (i.e. falsifiable)
- Recognized rate of error
- Meet professional standards
- Admissibility of Expert Testimony: Canada
- Mohan Criteria
- Provided by an expert
- Relevant
- Necessary
- Not violating rules of exclusion
Psychological Theories of Crime
- Psychoanalytic
- Internal dynamics and early experiences
- Example: Theory of Maternal Deprivation (John Bowlby)
- Early separation from the mother prevents effective social development
- Results in Antisocial Behaviour Patterns
- Learning
- Learning through direct and indirect consequences
- Example: Social Learning Theory (Albert Bandura)
- Criminal behaviour is learned
- Direct and indirect reinforcement (e.g., anti-social peers, violence on television)
- Personality
- People commit crimes because of their personality traits
- Example: Bio-social Theory (Hans Eysenck)
- Testable
- PEN Model
- People high on Neuroticism and Extraversion are more likely to become involved in crime