Overview
- Speaker: Dr. Megan Lenardon (Senior Lecturer, School of BABS), 30 June 2025, 11:05 PM
- Purpose: illustrate the 3-step medical biotechnology framework using medical mycology (esp. Candida albicans) as a worked example
- Lecture roadmap
- Define medical biotechnology
- Quick primer on fungi and fungal disease
- Deep dive into C. albicans biology, diagnostics, and therapy
- Show how basic knowledge ➜ new biotech solutions (antibody-based tools)
The 3 Steps of Medical Biotechnology
- Understand the disease
– Anatomy, physiology, microbiology, pathogenesis - Assess the clinical needs
– What is missing/deficient in current diagnosis, treatment, prevention? - Exploit biological knowledge
– Translate discoveries into diagnostics, drugs, vaccines, preventives
Learning outcome: be able to quote C. albicans–focused examples for each step.
Definition of Medical Biotechnology
- Australian Government (≈ 2017):
“Use of living cells & cell materials to research and produce pharmaceutical or diagnostic products that help treat & prevent human diseases.” - Within Applied Biomolecular Sciences, this is biomolecular knowledge → medical setting.
Fungal Biology Primer
- Mycology = study of fungi (Gr. mykes = fungus + -logy = study)
- Classical fungus definition:
- Chemo-organo-trophic eukaryote (oxidises organic electron donors)
- Lacks chlorophyll; forms spores
- Cell wall of polysaccharide (chitin/cellulose)
- Absorptive nutrition
- Membrane sterol = ergosterol (vs. human cholesterol)
- Traditional classification by morphology: mushrooms, moulds, yeasts; now DNA based
- Key terms
- Chemotroph: derives energy by oxidising chemical compounds
- Organotroph: uses organic molecules as e⁻ source
- Polysaccharide: polymeric sugar; examples chitin, β-glucan
Diversity & Beneficial Roles
- Visual gallery: button mushrooms, delicate Pleurotus-like forms, fruit moulds, spore structures, yeasts
- Ecosystem services: nutrient recycling, even plastic degradation → most fungi are harmless
Fungal Pathogenicity Snapshot
- Pop-culture link: “The Last of Us” (fictional Cordyceps zombies) raised public awareness
- Real host range: plants, insects, amphibians, mammals
- Plant diseases: corn smut (Ustilago maydis), rice blast (Magnaporthe grisea), potato blight (Phytophthora infestans, an oomycete)
- Insects: zombie ants (Ophiocordyceps unilateralis), bee mycoses
- Amphibians: chytridiomycosis (chytrid fungus)
- Mammals: bat white-nose syndrome (fungus grows during hibernation)
- Human infections
- Superficial (surface, non-lethal): ringworm, athlete’s foot/tinea, onychomycosis; affect ≥ 25\% of global population
- Invasive/systemic (internal, lethal): sepsis, organ invasion
WHO 2022 Fungal Priority Pathogens List (Top 5)
Collective disease | Example species | Risk tier |
---|
Candidiasis | Candida auris, C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei | Critical / High / Medium |
Aspergillosis | Aspergillus fumigatus | Critical |
Cryptococcosis | Cryptococcus neoformans, C. gattii | Critical / Medium |
Mucormycosis | Mucorales (“black fungi”) | High |
Pneumocystosis | Pneumocystis jirovecii | Medium |
Global burden (all five together):
• ≥ 6.5\text{ million} invasive cases / yr → ≥ 3.75\text{ million} deaths
• Mortality: untreated \approx 90\%; even with therapy 35–60\%
• Exceeds deaths from TB, malaria, breast or prostate cancer
Candida albicans Biology & Pathogenesis
- Pleomorphic: yeast ↔ pseudohypha ↔ true hypha
- Normal commensal of GI tract; 60–80\% of people carry it from birth
- Kept in check by:
- Bacterial microbiota (nutrient competition)
- Innate immunity (neutrophils & macrophages; video shown of phagocytosis)
- Superficial diseases: oral & vaginal thrush
- Invasive candidiasis (at-risk groups):
- Cancer chemotherapy, organ/stem-cell transplant recipients
- Immunosuppressive drugs, AIDS, major abdominal surgery, ICU patients
- Disease course: gut escape → bloodstream (candidemia) → dissemination to organs → sepsis → death; mouse-kidney lesions shown
- Rapid diagnosis + therapy markedly improves survival
Current Clinical Needs
Diagnostics
- Gold standard = blood culture
- Sensitivity only \approx 50\% (misses tissue-only cases)
- Time to result \approx 72\text{ h} → patient may succumb first
- CHROMagar Candida: chromogenic agar for species ID once grown
- Molecular tests (PCR/sequencing)
- Faster but hampered by tough fungal cell wall (manual bead-beating needed)
- Difficult to distinguish harmless colonisation vs disease-causing invasion
Therapy
- Terminology: antibiotics = antibacterial only; antifungals target fungi
- Need exploitable fungal-specific features → only a few drug classes
Approved systemic classes vs Candida
- Polyenes (e.g. amphotericin B) – bind ergosterol; potent but nephro-/hepato-toxic
- Azoles (e.g. fluconazole) – inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis; widespread resistance
- Echinocandins (e.g. caspofungin) – block β-1,3-glucan synthase (cell-wall); low toxicity but resistance emerging; first approved > 20 years ago, only derivatives since
Comparative numbers: \text{antifungal classes}=5 vs >200 antibacterial classes
C. albicans Cell-Wall Architecture
- Electron micrograph: plasma membrane (ergosterol-rich) + layered wall
- Structural polysaccharides
- Chitin microfibrils (brown in model)
- β-1,3-glucan triple helices (green)
- Outer fibrillar layer = highly mannosylated proteins (mannan chains)
- Wall uniqueness → prime drug/diagnostic target (absent in humans)
From Basic Biology to Biotech Solutions
- Lab programmes
- Map wall biosynthesis → novel drug targets
- Collaborate with chem-eng on antifungal polymers
- Study GI colonisation for microbiome-based prevention
- Today’s focus: antibody-based diagnostics/therapies targeting wall mannans
Antibody Fundamentals (Rapid Recap)
- Natural antibody = Y-shaped protein produced by B cells
- Variable (V) region: epitope-specific; 3 Complementarity-Determining Regions (CDR1-3)
- Constant (C) region: species-specific effector domain
- Antigen: protein, carbohydrate, small molecule, nucleotide
- Epitope: precise part of antigen bound by antibody
- Preparations
- Polyclonal sera: mix of antibodies → multiple epitopes; varied CDR DNA
- Monoclonal (mAb): identical, single-epitope binder; cloned B-cell or recombinant
- Engineered fragments: Fab, F(ab')₂, scFv / scAb (single-chain variable fragment) – retain CDRs, easier recombinant expression
Why Monoclonal Antibodies for Fungal Disease?
- Can exploit even subtle fungal-human differences → high specificity
- Intrinsically non-toxic to humans; off-target effects minimal
- Circumvent mechanisms of small-molecule resistance (novel mode of action)
Discovery of Anti-Mannan Monoclonals
- Strategy: identify antibodies that bind C. albicans wall mannans
- Phage-display library panning (detailed multistep cycle)
- Output: DNA sequences of CDRs for candidate monoclonals
- Recombinant production: scAb format
- Human κ light chain spacer + CDRs + 6\timesHis tag
- Expression in E. coli → rapid, low-cost screening
Key Clones: 1A2 & 1H6
- Naming arbitrary (plate wells); both bind C. albicans mannan exclusively
- Specificity ELISA: high OD only with C. albicans mannan; zero cross-reactivity to
- Other fungal mannans (e.g. Saccharomyces, Cryptococcus)
- Non-mannan polysaccharides / monosaccharides
- Affinity: single-chain antibodies showed stronger binding than some full-length anti-mannan mAbs (sub-nanomolar K_D)
Functional Activity
- In vitro fungicidal assay
- Both scAbs killed C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, C. krusei
- Viability ↓ vs untreated and irrelevant scAb controls
- In vivo protection (Galleria mellonella larvae model)
- Inject larvae: one pro-leg Candida, opposite pro-leg treatment
- Survival curve: 1H6 (orange) prolonged survival vs saline; median survival day 5 → day 7+
- Live larvae remain white; dead turn black (easy scoring)
Practical Considerations: Full mAb vs Fragment
- Fragments (scAb/scFv)
- Pros: simple bacterial expression, cost-effective, ideal for discovery & diagnostic kit integration
- Cons: rapid renal clearance in humans, potential immunogenicity if non-human framework, lack Fc effector functions
- Full-length humanised mAb
- Required for therapeutic injection (longer half-life, complement/ADCC)
- Production in mammalian systems, higher cost/time
- Development pipeline: fragment for screening ⟶ humanised IgG for clinic
Mapping to the 3 Biotechnology Steps
Step | C. albicans Case Study |
---|
1 Understand disease | Molecular cell wall map; identification of mannan as unique outer epitope |
2 Assess clinical need | Diagnostics too slow (72 h culture, 50\% sensitivity); drugs limited (5 classes, toxicity/resistance) |
3 Exploit knowledge | Phage-display-derived anti-mannan monoclonals for rapid detection & passive immunotherapy |
Key Takeaways
- Invasive fungal disease = major, under-recognized killer (> 3.75\text{ M} deaths/yr)
- C. albicans normally harmless commensal can become lethal in immunocompromised hosts
- Current gold-standard diagnostics & drugs have serious limitations
- Fungal-specific cell wall components (e.g. mannan, β-glucan) are rich biotech targets
- Monoclonal antibody technology offers:
- Highly specific detection (diagnostics)
- Novel therapeutic modality (direct fungicidal activity, immune engagement)
- Phage display + recombinant engineering rapidly deliver candidate antibodies (1A2, 1H6) with proof-of-principle efficacy in vitro & in vivo
- Illustrates full medical biotechnology pipeline: discovery → need identification → translational product design
Possible Exam/Revision Prompts (as provided by lecturer)
- State & exemplify the 3 steps of medical biotechnology
- Define “medical biotechnology” and contrast with basic research
- Describe key differences between fungal & human cells exploitable for therapy
- List classes of systemic antifungals, their targets, and limitations
- Explain why blood culture has only 50\% sensitivity for invasive candidiasis
- Draw/annotate C. albicans cell wall layers, indicating drug/antibody targets
- Compare polyclonal vs monoclonal antibodies; give clinical uses of each
- Outline phage-display workflow for antibody discovery
- Discuss advantages & caveats of antibody fragments vs full IgG in therapy