Introduction to Language of Research

Module 1a: Introduction to Language of Research

Instructor: Maribel Guerrero, Ph.D.

Course: PAF 501

Section 1a: Learning Objectives

  • Understanding the Research Method: Importance and implications of using a scientific approach in research.

  • Language in Research: Overview of terminology and structure prevalent in academic research efforts.

Importance of Scientific Methods

Definitions

  • Scientific Methods: Systematic observations based on six principles:

    • Empirically Testable: Research must be verifiable through observation or experimentation.

    • Replicable: Research findings can be duplicated under the same conditions.

    • Objective: Elimination of bias in data collection and analysis.

    • Transparent: Research process is open and clear for peer review and scrutiny.

    • Falsifiable: Statements made in research can be proven false or true.

    • Logically Consistent: Findings should correlate logically with hypotheses and existing theories.

Non-Scientific Methods

  • Reliance on subjective and unverified sources such as:

    • Opinions: Casual personal beliefs or feelings.

    • Intuition/Belief: Emotional or instinctive feelings without empirical evidence.

    • Consensus/Assumptions: Agreement among groups without verification.

    • Authority Opinion: Belief in a statement simply due to its source.

    • Biased Observations: Personal interpretations that skew the understanding of data.

Research Questions

Definition

  • Research Question: Represents specific inquiries that a study aims to address.

Types of Research Questions

  1. Descriptive: A study aimed at describing phenomena or populations (e.g., proportions voting in an election).

  2. Relational: Examining relationships between variables (e.g., differences in voting intentions between genders).

  3. Causal: Investigating if and how one or more variables influence outcome variables (e.g., impact of advertising on election preferences).

  • Example Policy Issue: Evaluating if increasing the price of trash collection affects citizen perceptions of value.

Theory

Definition

  • Theory: General propositions or verified explanations of facts or phenomena, such as the public choice theory.

    • Theories aim to explain reality and are formulated and tested through scientific methods.

    • Untested theories are viewed as mere beliefs.

Types of Logic in Research

  • Inductive Logic: From specific observations to general theories (ground-up approach).

  • Deductive Logic: From established theories to specific hypotheses (top-down approach).

Example in Context

  • Public Choice Theory: Suggests citizens opt for cost-effective services, promoting efficiency in service delivery in municipal contexts.

Hypotheses

Definition

  • Hypothesis: A specific statement predicting what will occur in the study.

Key Characteristics

  • Hypotheses indicate specific relationships based on theoretical expectations.

  • Not all studies require formal hypotheses; exploratory studies may precede hypothesis creation.

Example Policy Context

  • Hypothesis: Increased trash collection quality will improve citizen perspective on cost valuation.

Types of Relationships in Hypotheses

  1. Positive Relationship: High values in one variable relate to high values in another.

  2. Negative Relationship: High values in one variable associate with low values in another.

  3. Curvilinear Relationship: Variable relationships change in a non-linear fashion.

Constructs

Definition

  • Construct: Abstract concepts created for empirical measurement in research.

Example

  • Public choice theory relates the quality of trash collection (Construct A) to citizens' perceptions of costs (Construct B).

Variables

Definitions

  • Variable: Observable and measurable entity which can take on various values. Types include:

  1. Independent Variables: Influence or explain other variables.

  2. Dependent Variables: Measured outcomes resulting from independent variables.

  3. Mediating Variables: Intermediate variables affected by independent ones but explaining dependent ones.

  4. Moderating Variables: Influence the strength of relationships between independent and dependent variables.

  5. Control Variables: Maintain constant conditions to isolate independent effects.

Time in Research

Definition

  • Time: A crucial factor in determining research design types:

  1. Cross-Sectional: Analysis at a single point in time.

  2. Longitudinal: Research conducted across multiple time points, allowing changes over time to be evaluated.

Unit of Analysis

Definitions

  • Unit of Analysis: The main entity examined in a study, which can include individuals, groups, or objects. Possible types:

    • Individuals, groups, organizations, artifacts, geographical units, social interactions.

Types of Data

  • Quantitative Research: Focuses on numerical data to answer "how much?" or "how many?"

    • Typically uses larger samples (>30 participants).

    • Employs structured methods to limit variability.

  • Qualitative Research: Concentrates on understanding the reasons behind behavior, focusing on "why?" type questions.

    • Usually involves smaller sample sizes (5-8 participants).

    • Flexible approaches that evolve during research execution.

Conclusions

Summary Points

  • Importance of scientific methods in research.

  • Various types of research questions and hypothesis structures.

  • Relevance of theory and constructs in understanding variable relationships.

  • Impact of time and data type considerations in the research process.

Section 1b: Introduction to Philosophy of Research

Learning Objectives

  • Understanding applied philosophical thoughts in research contexts.

  • Overview of the structure and components of the research process.

  • Logic of programs or policies and their relation to research processes.

Deductive Approach

Definition

  • Deductive Reasoning: Moves from general assumptions to specific conclusions.

    1. Starting with a theory.

    2. Narrow theory into hypotheses.

    3. Collect observations related to hypotheses.

    4. Test hypotheses with specific data.

Inductive Approach

Definition

  • Inductive Reasoning: Works from specific observations to broader theories.

    1. Begin with specific observations.

    2. Identify patterns.

    3. Form tentative hypotheses.

    4. Develop general conclusions.

Comparison of Inductive vs. Deductive Approaches

  • Inductive Approaches: Aim to explore and describe phenomena, using qualitative data analysis.

  • Deductive Approaches: Focused on confirming or testing hypotheses through quantitative analysis.

Basic Approaches (Quantitative/Qualitative)

  • Theoretical: Development and testing of theories addressing operational realities.

  • Empirical: Based on observations; real measurements progress understanding.

  • Idiosyncratic vs. Nomothetic: Individual matters versus general patterns across multiple instances.

Paradigms in Social Research

Definitions

  • Paradigms: Conceptual frameworks shaping research perspectives.

    • Positivism: Ensures theories are verified through observable data.

    • Post-positivism: Accepts the challenge of verifying truth but values the scientific method. - Ontology: Study of existence. - Epistemology: Inquiry into knowledge acquisition.

Structure of Research

Components of Causal Studies

  • Research Problem: The general issue or query.

  • Research Questions: Narrowly defined specific inquiries rooted in theoretical context.

  • Program: Specific hypotheses articulated in operational terms.

  • Units: Relates to subjects or entities sampled for data.

  • Outcomes: Desired results corresponding to the research problem.

  • Design: Comparison of effects from different programs or conditions.

Program Outcome Model

Definition

  • Breaks a program into components for clearer understanding of expected results by decision-makers.

Final Conclusions

Summary Points

  • Reviewed deductive and inductive approaches.

  • Discussed paradigms relevant to research methodologies.

  • Outlined the research process and structure.

Tasks after learning:

  1. Revise materials for enhanced understanding.

  2. Read supplementary texts (e.g., Trochim).

  3. Engage in discussion with peers.

  4. Apply concepts learned to specific research assignments.