Week 5 EBP Qualitative Research Credibility, Transferability, Dependability, and Confirmability
Credibility
- Definition: An evaluation of whether the research findings represent a credible conceptual interpretation of the data.
- Reflects truthfulness and believability of the findings.
- Considerations:
- Do the descriptions provided by participants align with the researcher's explanation?
- Technique to Enhance Credibility: Member Checking
- Definition: Evaluating the accuracy of transcription by allowing participants to review transcripts.
- Example from AFL Injury Study (Ruddock-Hudson, O’Halloran, & Murphy, 2012):
- One-quarter of the sample was randomly selected and sent copies of transcripts for review.
- The article included quotes exemplifying themes, such as:
- Theme: ‘The influence of social support’
- Quote: "My family has always been there to provide me with support…The medical staff were great when I was injured."
- Technique to Enhance Credibility: Triangulation
- Definition: Using at least three methods to crosscheck results.
- Example: Crosschecking themes from interview transcripts with results of psychometric tests.
- Psychometric tests measure knowledge, abilities, attitudes, and personality traits.
- Note: Triangulation was not performed in the Ruddock-Hudson study and was noted as a limitation.
- Abstract of Ruddock-Hudson Study:
- Explored psychological responses to injury in Australian rules footballers.
- Forty-three professional AFL players participated in semi-structured interviews.
- Results detailed AFL players' recalled past injury experiences.
- Included initial emotional reactions to injury (dependent on severity), isolation during injury, repetitive rehabilitation, and the influence of social support.
Transferability
- Definition: Indicates the extent to which study findings can be generalized or applied to other individuals/groups, contexts, or settings.
- Considerations:
- Can findings from the AFL injury study be applied to elite female netballers or the workplace?
- Transferability indicates the degree to which qualitative findings inform and facilitate insights within other contexts, other than that in which the research was conducted.
- Limitations Section of Ruddock-Hudson Article:
- The sample was obtained from only one club.
- The club culture may have systematically influenced the results.
- Implication: Results may have limited transferability to other AFL clubs.
Dependability and Confirmability
- Dependability: Assessment of the quality of data collection, data analysis, and theory generation processes.
- Confirmability: Measure of how well the inquiry's findings are supported by the data collected.
- Process to enhance dependability and confirmability:
- Independent Audit: A competent peer examines original transcripts, data analysis documents, field journals, member checking comments, and the journal manuscript.
- The auditor evaluates the degree and significance of researcher influence or bias in the interviews.
- Rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research can be considered in terms of credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability.
- Guides and instruments exist to support those critiquing qualitative studies.
- CASP Qualitative Checklist: Comprised of 10 questions:
- Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?
- Is a qualitative methodology appropriate?
- Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?
- Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research?
- Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?
- Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered?
- Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?
- Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?
- Is there a clear statement of findings?
- How valuable is the research?