Anthropological Fieldwork
Firsthand observation and direct immersion into the culture or people a researcher is trying to understand.
Important names and concepts:
Malinowski
The field
Ethnography
Thick description
Fieldwork Advantages
Allows insights not possible with short visits, surveys, or brief interviews.
Emic Perspective: Yields understanding of culture and behaviors that people themselves might not be aware of.
Etic Perspective:
See “Thinking Like an Anthropologist: Fieldwork in an American Mall” (Photo: AP Photo/Brian Kersey)
Participant Observation
"Disciplined hanging out."
Establishing rapport as a "professional stranger" requires discipline and acceptance of local customs, however peculiar, unfamiliar, or uncomfortable.
Native's Point of View
Insider's or emic perspective.
Seeing things in terms of the local context.
Malinowski referred to this perspective as "the native’s point of view" and asserted that it was at the heart of the ethnographic method.
Anthropologist's Data
Fieldnotes: Any information that the anthropologist writes down or transcribes during fieldwork.
Interviews: Systematic conversation with an interlocutor to collect field research data, ranging from a highly structured set of questions to the most open-ended conversation.
Key Interlocutors: A person who aids the anthropologist in their research. Often someone well-connected in the community or someone with specific knowledge on the topic the researcher is interested in.
Intersubjectivity: Knowledge about other people emerges out of intersubjective relationships and perceptions individuals have with each other. It emerges through interactions with others, who provide insights and viewpoints.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Data
Ethics involves principles, morals, values, honesty, honor, right choices, fairness, conscience, and responsibility.
Ethics in Anthropology
Not just obeying guidelines but goes to the heart of the discipline.
Premises on which its practitioners operate, its epistemology, theory, and praxis.
What is anthropology for? Who is it for?
American Anthropological Association (AAA) Code of Ethics (2012)
Core Principles:
Do not harm.
Be open and honest regarding your work (transparency).
Obtain informed consent and necessary permissions.
Weigh competing ethical obligations due to collaborators and affected parties.
Make your results accessible.
Protect and preserve your records.
Maintain respectful and ethical professional relationships.
History of the Ethical Code
First code in 1971 in response to the Vietnam War.
First set of issues raised within the AAA:
Social scientists as spies, intelligence-related research.
Secret or clandestine research.
Responsibility to “people studied”?
Responsibility to sponsors of research?
Ethical Concerns Guiding Anthropologists
Do no harm.
Obtain informed consent.
Ensure anonymity.
Make results accessible.
Thinking Critically About Ethics
What does “do not harm” mean?
What does obtain “informed consent” mean?
What does “remain transparent” mean?
What does “no interference” mean?
Polyvocality
Include multiple voices in their writing.
Whose voices am I representing?
Reflexivity
Self-analysis.
What is my position in this community?
Ethnographic Authority
Establish credibility.
What experience do I have to write about this?
Anthropology's Ties to Colonialism
Anthropology is ineluctably tied to histories of colonialism and dispossession.
Anthropology as writing about “the Other”.
Anthropology as speaking for and about Indigenous groups and minorities, with material and devastating impacts
Thinking Critically About Anthro's Past
Old, white men?
Boas: Accused of salvage anthropology; criticized for work with Indigenous communities
Can we teach anthropology’s history differently?
Decolonizing the Discipline?
Reflexive turn in 1970s.
What does it mean to truly decolonize?
What does it look like?
Reassessing the Discipline
Reassess what the discipline can and should look like.
Who is valued as a scholar, what work gets recognized, who gets funding?
Reassess the colonial nature of our own anthropological practice.
Who do we cite? Whose voices do we recognize?
Diversify anthropology departments.
Who gets hired?
Teach anthropology differently.
Whose scholarship do we mark as important?
Can we teach anthropology differently?