Constrained Court
Courts are limited in creating social change due to political, institutional, and social constraints.
Dynamic Court
Courts can create significant social change, even against resistance from other government branches.
Life Tenure, Good Behavior
Federal judges serve for life unless committing serious offenses, ensuring independence.
Judicial Independence
Courts function without undue influence from legislative or executive branches.
Due Process
Legal guarantees ensure the government respects all owed legal rights.
Judicial Review
Courts decide if laws/actions are unconstitutional (e.g., Marbury v. Madison).
Levels of Judicial Scrutiny
Rational Basis: Presumed valid if reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.
Intermediate Scrutiny: Furthering an important interest in a substantially related way.
Strict Scrutiny: requires compelling interest and narrowly tailored means.
Counter-majoritarian
Courts protect minority rights, even against the majority's will.
Constitutional Right to Privacy
Implied right in the Constitution to protect personal decisions (e.g., reproductive choices).
Democratic Constitutionalism
Constitutional meaning evolves via public dialogue and activism.
Secular Humanism
A worldview emphasizing reason, ethics, and justice without religious influence.
Open Secret
Publicly known but unacknowledged facts.
Abortion Reform
Efforts to amend abortion-related laws and policies.
Worldview
Comprehensive lens for interpreting the world (e.g., religious vs. secular on reproductive rights).
Originalism
Interpreting the Constitution based on its original meaning when ratified.
Original Public Meaning
The Constitution’s words as understood by the public at the time.
Original Intent
The framers’ intentions.
Militia
Citizens organized for defense, central to Second Amendment debates.
Individual Rights Reading
Interprets the Second Amendment as protecting personal gun ownership.
Means-ends Reasoning
Balancing law’s purpose against its methods.
Heritage v. History
Tension between celebrating tradition and acknowledging historical realities.
Abhorrence Problem
Reconciling originalism with historical injustices.
Act-Status Distinction
Differentiates punishing acts (e.g., sodomy) vs. discriminating against status (e.g., being gay).
Sodomy Laws
Laws criminalizing specific sexual acts, historically targeting LGBTQ+ people.
Harm Principle
Laws should only restrict actions causing harm to others.
Equal Protection
Constitutional guarantee of equal law application.
“Rational Basis with a Bite”
Stricter rational basis review in some LGBTQ+ cases.
Morality Laws
Laws enforcing moral beliefs, often challenged in LGBTQ+ contexts.
But-for Reasoning
Determines discrimination by asking if the outcome differs "but for" someone’s status.