Title: The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology
Authors: Andrew S. Field, Wendy A. Raymond, Mary Rickard, Lauren Arnold, Elena F. Brachelet, Benjaporn Chaiwun, Lan Cheng, Luigi Di Bonito, Daniel F.I. Kurtyczi, Andrew H.S. Lee, Elgene Lim, Britt-Marie Ljung, Pamela Michelow, Robert Y. Osamura, Maurizio Pinamonti, Torill Sauer, Davendra Segaras, Gary Tset, Philippe Vielh, Phek Y. Chong, Fernando Schmitt
Published: Acta Cytologica, 2019;63:257–273
DOI: 10.1159/000499509
The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) has established a standardized reporting system for breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytology.
The system was developed by a collaborative group of cytopathologists and clinicians experienced in breast diagnostics.
The project started with a meeting at the 2016 International Congress of Cytology in Yokohama.
Key Features of the IAC Yokohama System:
Five reporting categories: Insufficient/Inadequate, Benign, Atypical, Suspicious of Malignancy, Malignant.
Each category includes a clear term, definition, Risk Of Malignancy (ROM), and management algorithm.
Emphasizes the importance of high-quality FNAB procedures and the role of trained cytopathologists.
Current FNAB practices and indicators have been reviewed and adapted to optimize patient management.
The IAC System for Reporting Breast FNAB Cytology is aimed at standardizing reporting, improving practitioner communication, and linking cytology findings with patient management.
The development followed changes in the role of FNAB with increasing reliance on core needle biopsy (CNB) and was informed by literature and expert feedback.
FNAB is noted for its rapid, accurate, cost-effective performance with minimal complications in diagnosing breast lesions.
Categories for Reporting FNAB:
Insufficient/Inadequate: Smears too poorly cellular or fixed for a diagnosis.
Benign: Clear benign features; further biopsy usually unnecessary.
Atypical: Features seen in benign processes but with some that are uncommon; indicates a potential for malignancy.
Suspicious of Malignancy: Some malignant features but not definitive; indicates further examination is required.
Malignant: Clear signs of malignancy, where further management is necessary.
Evaluates measurements for FNAB, including specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and ROM derived from literature.
Recent findings indicate specific ROM rates across categories for insufficient (2.6–4.8%), benign (1.4–2.3%), atypical (13–15.7%), suspicious (84.6–97.1%), and malignant (99.0–100%).
Emphasizes a comprehensive approach that includes clinical, imaging, and cytological findings in the management of breast lesions.
Recommends FNAB results be used to guide management decisions based on individual patient scenarios.
Proposes further study and refinement based on ongoing data collection and analysis.
Emphasizes the need for proper training in FNAB technique and processing of smears, with standardized reporting enhancing communication between cytopathologists and clinicians.
Discusses the technical procedures involved in FNAB including the importance of sufficient cellularity and appropriate categorization of results.
The IAC Yokohama System will stimulate ongoing discussion and research, aiming for improved patient outcomes in breast diagnostic practices.
By standardizing reporting, the system hopes to bridge gaps between cytopathologists, clinicians, and imaging specialists for better management of breast lesions.
Cites a range of studies and documents informing the guidelines and practices discussed throughout the paper.