Renaissance & Reformation (covered in Western Civ I) already reshaped European thought, religion, and technology.
15th – 16th centuries mark a shift from Europe as the single geographic center of “the West” to a trans-Atlantic civilization after overseas expansion.
European exploration inaugurates the so-called “New World,” permanently linking Europe, Africa, and the Americas.
Historians emphasize MULTIPLE, intersecting causes; no single “smoking gun.”
Key clusters of causation: intellectual curiosity, trade/wealth, technology, political patronage, religion, and personal fame.
Long-standing Western fascination with the “unknown” beyond familiar borders.
Marco Polo (13th c. Venetian) becomes a celebrity chronicling the Far East.
His Travels are mass-produced after the invention of the movable-type printing press (mid-1400s—described by the lecturer as “the most important technological innovation in the modern era in the West.”)
Illustration: Polo riding an elephant—symbol of exotic wonders.
Early “travel literature” cultivates a European reading public eager for tales of distant lands.
Sir John Mandeville (14th c.)—possibly fictitious—describes fantastical creatures; reprinted widely, shaping European expectations of the Americas.
Renaissance humanists recover Ptolemy’s Geographia (2nd c. AD).
Supplies a reasonably accurate—though circumference-underestimated—world map.
Reinforces the concept of a spherical Earth, a pre-condition for westward navigation.
Ottoman Turks capture the Byzantine capital, closing the Silk Road’s main overland artery.
With the East blocked, merchants and monarchs seek an alternate sea route to Asian spices, textiles, and other luxuries.
Logic: If the Earth is round, sail west to reach the “Far East.”
Caravel (Portuguese/Spanish design): sturdy, fast, highly maneuverable; ideal for open-ocean voyages.
Astrolabe (borrowed from Islamic civilization): uses stellar positions for latitude calculation.
Improvements in cartography, rigging, and compass reliability accompany these ships.
Geography: Portugal’s Atlantic frontage makes it Europe’s “launchpad.”
Prince Henry “the Navigator” funds repeated probes down Africa’s west coast.
Spain (unified by Ferdinand & Isabella) quickly rivals Portugal.
Employs foreign captains—e.g., Genoese Christopher Columbus—if results promise wealth.
Arms-race mentality: if Portugal explores, Spain must also.
Gold
Precious metals in the Americas (especially gold & silver) drive royal sponsorship.
Conquistadors granted licenses to conquer and mine.
God
Catholic monarchs view new territories as mission fields.
After the Protestant Reformation (16th c.), the Americas become a front in the Catholic–Protestant contest.
Orders involved:
Franciscans & Recollets initiate early missions.
Jesuits later dominate, practicing enculturation—learning local languages & customs to evangelize “from within.”
Sometimes protect Indigenous groups against European abuse (depicted in the 1980s film The Mission).
Glory
Personal fame for explorers; national prestige for sponsors.
Public acclaim fueled by print—voyage accounts become bestsellers.
Hernán Cortés (1519–1521)
Leads conquest of the Aztec Empire.
Exploits Indigenous resentment of Aztec domination; forges native alliances.
Smallpox & other diseases devastate Aztec population.
Later critics (e.g., Bartolomé de las Casas) denounce Spanish brutality; modern scholars debate the term “genocide.”
Christopher Columbus (4 voyages, 1492–1504)
Sailor from Genoa, backed by Spain.
Uses Ptolemaic underestimated-circumference map; believes he reached “India,” hence calling inhabitants “Indians.”
Captures global imagination; returns to Europe with goods, stories, and (reportedly) Indigenous individuals.
Ferdinand Magellan (1519–1522)
Portuguese in Spanish service.
First expedition to circumnavigate the globe; Magellan himself killed in the Philippines, crew completes journey.
Coins the term Pacifica for the Pacific Ocean, noting its relative calm vs. the Atlantic.
Rapid European arrival triggers massive Indigenous population decline via disease, warfare, forced labor, and cultural disruption.
Debate over intentionality vs. inadvertent catastrophe informs modern use of terms like ethnocide or genocide.
Mission systems reshape native societies—agriculture, settlement patterns, and religious practice.
Portugal & Spain form the first trans-oceanic empires, later joined by France, England, and the Dutch Republic.
Colonization sets the stage for global trade networks—precursor to modern globalization.
Printing press links exploration to previous information revolutions (e.g., Renaissance humanism).
Fall of Constantinople, Reformation, and Jesuit order show how European religious politics directly influence colonial policy.
Iberian maritime innovations diffuse to Northern Europe, enabling later English, French, and Dutch colonial ventures.
1200s – Marco Polo’s original journey.
1370s–1380s – Approx. composition of Sir John Mandeville’s travel tales.
1453 – Ottoman capture of Constantinople.
1450s – Gutenberg’s movable-type printing press spreads.
1492 – Columbus’ first voyage; Europe learns of the Caribbean.
1519–1521 – Cortés conquers the Aztec Empire.
1519–1522 – Magellan’s circumnavigation (crew completion).
1500s – Rapid rise of Jesuit missionary networks after the order’s founding in 1540.
3 G’s ⇒ Gold + God + Glory = European Expansion
Geography Equation (implicit): Westward Route + Round Earth + Caravel + Astrolabe ⇒ Trans-Atlantic Voyages
16^{th}-century Europe’s first ocean-going colonial states: Portugal and Spain
Geographic advantage: western Iberian Peninsula faces Atlantic, easing trans-oceanic departures/returns
Both staunchly Catholic monarchies → fear that overseas rivalry could spark a European war
A Spaniard, Rodrigo Borgia, elected pope ⇒ Pope Alexander VI (r. 1492–1503)
Issued papal bull Inter Caetera in 1493
Core idea: country that first discovers (“discovers” = arrives under Christian flag) a territory gains full sovereignty; no other Christian power may contest
This principle is later labelled the Doctrine of Discovery
Ethical blind spot: treated non-European lands as terra nullius (empty land) despite existing indigenous societies
Follow-up negotiation, ultimately signed 1494 by Spanish & Portuguese envoys
Drew a meridian (visible on contemporary maps/illustrations) allocating:
West of the line ⇒ Spain
East of the line ⇒ Portugal
The pope provided formal approval (papal “seal”)
Intended purpose: avert Iberian war by creating mutually recognised spheres of influence
Diplomatic significance: first major Western case of “sphere carving” to pre-empt conflict — a model revived in later imperial diplomacy (e.g., 19^{th}-century “Scramble for Africa”)
Doctrine of Discovery remains embedded in Vatican legal tradition (never formally rescinded)
Indigenous activists highlight the doctrine’s role in colonisation & dispossession
2022: During Pope Francis’s visit to Canada, indigenous protestors demanded an explicit renunciation; no definitive revocation yet, though Vatican statements imply repudiation in practice
Precedents & echoes:
Roman Emperor Diocletian (~285 CE) split empire West/East via an imaginary meridian down the Mediterranean
Balfour Declaration / Sykes-Picot–style mandates (1917 & post-WWI) — Britain & France divided the collapsing Ottoman domains, producing modern borders of Syria, Jordan, Iraq, etc.
Critique: Absent on-the-ground consultation ==> borders ignore ethnic, cultural, ecological realities → later instability (e.g., Middle-East conflicts)
Definition: Trans-Atlantic movement of biological species, food crops, animals, pathogens, and humans initiated after 1492
Old → New World transfers:
Animals: horses, cattle, pigs, sheep
Crops & stimulants: coffee (originating Middle East), sugarcane, wheat, olives
Pathogens: smallpox, measles, influenza ⇒ catastrophic epidemics among indigenous peoples who lacked immunity (demographic collapse in many regions)
New → Old World transfers:
Staple crops: maize (corn), potatoes, tomatoes, cassava, peanuts
Luxuries/commodities: cacao (chocolate), tobacco, vanilla, rum
Net result: reshaped European diet, boosted caloric intake, altered agriculture (e.g., Irish reliance on potato)
Origins: European traders exploit West African rivalries; purchase war captives → forced transport across Atlantic (Middle Passage)
Middle Passage marked by brutal shipboard conditions, high mortality
Initial destinations: Caribbean & Portuguese/Spanish South America (Brazil, etc.)
Encomienda (large Spanish estates)
Owners receive Crown licence to extract labour/tribute from assigned population
De facto slavery; harsh treatment documented by Bartolomé de las Casas
Spanish monarchy limits encomienda in late 1500s, yet chattel slavery persists into 19^{th} century
Flow of bullion, agricultural exports, and enslaved labour creates entirely new economic system centred on Atlantic basin
Iberian monopoly slowly erodes as French, English, Dutch fleets join (late 16^{th} ⇢ 17^{th} cent.)
Maritime commerce + joint-stock companies ⇒ foundations for modern capitalist practices (risk-sharing, insurance, long-distance credit)
Tri-cultural blend:
Indigenous peoples
European settlers/administrators
African slaves
Christian missionary efforts (Dominicans, Franciscans, Jesuits) spread Catholicism; churches built in European styles, gradually integrate local motifs → Spanish colonial aesthetic
Urban pattern: plazas, cathedrals, grid street plans modelled on Iberian precedents (e.g., Mexico City, Lima)
Discovery narrative sparks European curiosity about unknown nature, fuelling empirical inquiry → leads toward Scientific Revolution
Reorientation of Europe’s worldview: economic and intellectual focus shifts from East (Silk/Spice routes) to West (Atlantic world)
Legacy debates:
Human cost (genocide, slavery, cultural loss) vs. technological & economic dynamism
Ongoing legal/ethical questions about Indigenous sovereignty, reparations, and colonial borders
1492 – Columbus’s first voyage; Alexander VI elected pope
1493 – Papal bull Inter Caetera; Doctrine of Discovery articulated
1494 – Treaty of Tordesillas (line of demarcation)
Late 1500s – Spanish Crown begins curbing encomienda abuses
16^{th}–17^{th} centuries – Expansion of French, English, Dutch Atlantic empires
19^{th} century – Second “scramble” for colonies; Tordesillas model revisited
1917 – Balfour Declaration, mandate borders in Middle East
2022 – Indigenous protests press Pope Francis to renounce Doctrine of Discovery
Former soldier; served during the Thirty Years’ War.
Described the conflict as “stupid,” “a waste,” and other negative descriptors.
Mentally scarred; sought refuge from chaos.
During a stay at an inn on his way back to France, turned to mathematics for comfort.
Mathematics offered certainty and order, sharply contrasting the disorder he had just witnessed.
His story illustrates an individual’s escape from wartime horrors into the calm of rational inquiry and science.
17th-century scientific revolution overlapped with the Protestant Reformation.
Many intellectuals disgusted by religious wars (Catholic-Protestant violence) gravitated toward science.
Science seen as:
A neutral territory free from sectarian strife.
A domain governed by universal laws rather than theological dogma.
Descartes is a key case study of this trend.
Protestant Reformation began in 1517 (Martin Luther’s 95 Theses on Wittenberg Cathedral door).
Holy Roman Empire (HRE) became fragmented along confessional lines.
Multiple decades of conflict followed Luther’s break with Rome.
Temporary peace achieved by the Peace of Augsburg (late 1550\text{s}), allowing rulers to choose Catholicism or Lutheranism for their territories.
Described as the “violent crescendo” of Europe’s religious wars.
Name is deceptively simple; the reality involved overlapping campaigns, shifting alliances, and dynastic disputes.
Geographic core: Holy Roman Empire.
Over 300 principalities, duchies, and city-states, split roughly into Catholic and Protestant camps.
Spark: Bohemia (modern Czechia).
Catholic–Protestant struggles over succession to the imperial throne.
Internationalization:
Though an HRE-centered conflict, outside powers intervened, escalating violence.
Example overlap: Dutch Wars for independence from Spanish Habsburg rule.
Spain’s Habsburg dynasty also presided over segments of the HRE.
The Netherlands (Calvinist) fought Spain’s Catholic authorities, tying their struggle to broader European conflict.
War shows how religious ideology can devolve into prolonged violence.
Scientific inquiry appeared ethically attractive: offered universal truths unsullied by sectarian hatred.
Descartes’ personal transformation embodies a wider shift:
From faith-based certainty → empirically grounded certainty.
Demonstrates how traumatic historical events can redirect intellectual history.
Protestant Reformation’s fragmentation sets stage for wars discussed here.
Peace of Augsburg previously covered as a “cuius regio, eius religio” compromise.
Descartes later contributions (e.g., analytic geometry, Cartesian doubt) build on his wartime retreat into mathematics.
1517 – Luther’s 95 Theses.
1550\text{s} – Peace of Augsburg brings temporary peace.
1618-1648 – Thirty Years’ War timeframe.
300+ – Number of semi-autonomous states in the Holy Roman Empire.
Link Descartes’ biography to his philosophical method: his search for indubitable truths parallels his rejection of wartime chaos.
Remember chronology: Reformation → Peace of Augsburg → Renaissance of conflict → Thirty Years’ War → Emergence of Scientific Revolution figures.
Understand geographic context: Bohemia (Czechia) ignition point, HRE fragmentation, Dutch independence struggle.
Recognize broader theme: intellectual movements often arise as responses to social and political crises.
• Principal outcome: emergence of France as Europe’s dominant power, eclipsing Spain, which had led during the Spanish Golden Age (Age of Exploration).
• Loss of the Spanish Netherlands and overall Spanish decline cemented French ascendancy—militarily, politically, and culturally.
• Peace of Westphalia established secular, state-centric diplomacy; France quickly embodied these principles.
• Full title: Cardinal Armand Jean du Plessis, Duke of Richelieu.
• Became First Minister (chief adviser) to King Louis XIII in 1624.
• Considered the first “modern” statesman for subordinating religion to raison d’état (reason of state).
• Balanced devout Catholic identity with a pragmatic, secular approach to power.
• Originated amid the French Wars of Religion (Catholics vs. Huguenots) beginning in the late 1570s, lasting roughly two decades.
• Core idea: the interests of the state supersede personal or sectarian religious commitments.
• Politique figures—Catholic or Protestant—prioritized national unity and stability over confessional triumph.
• Richelieu exemplified this ethos, proving religion could be “secondary & subservient” to state needs.
• The Edict of Nantes (originally 1598) had guaranteed Huguenot religious and certain political rights.
• Richelieu preserved freedom of worship for Protestants but curtailed their political/military autonomy:
– Stripped right to maintain fortified towns.
– Confiscated weapon stockpiles and banned Protestant nobles from private armies.
• Motivation: prevent internal factions capable of defying the crown, not to advance Catholicism per se.
• Demonstrated politique logic—unity & authority first, doctrine second.
• Mercantilism: theory that global wealth is finite; power = securing the largest share of bullion & resources.
• Visual metaphor: global wealth as a fixed “pie”—one nation’s bigger slice shrinks everyone else’s.
• Practical rules:
– Colonies may trade only with the mother country.
– Raw materials flow inward; finished goods flow outward.
• Under Richelieu, France applied mercantilist controls to New France (Canada) and Caribbean holdings, ensuring revenue bolstered royal coffers.
• Marks one of the earliest systematic economic “theories,” paralleling Scientific-Revolution rationality—analyzing nature (resources) to harness power.
• Medieval feudalism had diffused authority downward: lords → vassals.
• Richelieu reversed the flow, concentrating fiscal, military, and legal power in Paris.
• Laid groundwork for absolutism, later epitomized by Louis XIV.
• Methodology:
– Reduced noble independence (e.g., demolition of unlicensed castles).
– Installed royal intendants (bureaucratic agents) in provinces to enforce central policies and collect taxes.
– Asserted monopoly over violence (disarmament of factions).
• Guiding principle: the state is a unified, sovereign entity—not a patchwork of semi-autonomous fiefs.
• France entered the war in the early 1630s.
• Surprising alignment: supported Protestant forces against the Catholic Habsburgs, despite France’s own Catholic identity.
• Rationale: Habsburg Spain & Austria were France’s principal geopolitical rivals; weakening them advanced French security.
• Richelieu’s famous justification: “We acted for Raison\ d’\État” (reason of state).
• Illustrates secularization of diplomacy: strategic calculus outweighed confessional solidarity.
• Richelieu’s trio—politique ideology, mercantilism, and centralization—constituted a template for modern nation-states.
• Demonstrated that religious identity could be politically instrumental rather than determinative.
• Influenced later European power politics (balance-of-power system) and economic colonial policies (navigation acts, exclusive trade).
• Set the stage for French cultural supremacy (language, arts, court etiquette) in the 17^{th} & 18^{th} centuries.
• Foreshadowed later revolutions (American, French) by spotlighting the tension between centralized authority and local privileges.