Introduction to the concept of death and taxes in a humorous context.
Evidence suggests more children born in late December than early January.
Births seem correlated with maximizing tax deductions.
Reference: David Leonhardt, The New York Times.
Use wedge analysis to show taxes decrease traded quantities and create deadweight losses.
Show subsidies increase traded quantities and also create deadweight losses.
Understand who bears the tax burden based on elasticities, not who pays the check.
Utilize supply and demand analysis for various scenarios.
A tax levied on goods.
Key truths:
Tax payment does not depend on who writes the government check.
Tax burden depends on relative elasticities of demand and supply.
Such taxes raise government revenue but create deadweight losses.
Tax on sellers shifts the supply curve up by the tax amount.
Buyers pay more than before, sellers receive less.
Illustrates the price changes before and after the tax imposition.
A $1 tax shifts supply curve upward by $1.
Price increases by less than the full tax value.
A $1 tax shifts demand curve downward by $1.
Similar outcomes as the tax on sellers; price increase is less than the tax.
The tax wedge graphically represents tax impact.
Example: $1 tax leads to a price buyers pay being higher than what sellers receive.
Tax burden division depends on the relative elasticities of supply and demand.
The less elastic side bears a greater share of the tax load.
Similar humorous reiteration of taxes and deadlines.
When demand is more elastic than supply, sellers bear more tax burden.
Utilizes graphical representation to demonstrate impact.
When supply is more elastic than demand, buyers bear more of the tax.
Description includes graphical analysis.
Question posed about driving commitment in relationships as a metaphor for tax burden.
Implications for health insurance mandates and potential wage reductions.
Firms might replace workers with machines to cut costs.
Discussion on cigarette tax effectiveness depending on manufacturers' ability to dodge taxes.
National taxes seen as better at discouraging smoking.
Tax impacts consumer surplus, deadweight loss, and producer surplus.
Demonstrates quantitative impacts of taxes through examples.
Interactive question on potential tax revenue collected from gadgets.
Deadweight losses increase as demand elasticity increases.
Tax impact is minimized with inelastic demand.
Description of subsidies as reverse taxes where the government subsidizes consumers or producers.
Key insights about subsidies include their impact on elasticity and taxpayer funding.
Subsidies create a wedge between prices received by sellers and paid by buyers.
Example illustrates a $1 subsidy analysis.
Discussion about who benefits most from water subsidies in California.
Examines demand and supply elasticity around cotton.
Suppliers benefit more from subsidies when demand is more elastic than supply.
The debate over the value and purpose of a government loan to a production company.
Illustrates how a wage subsidy can increase employment while also costing the government.
Graphical depiction of labor demand and supply shifts due to subsidy.
Quiz question discussing the implications and correctness of statements on taxation.
Question posed about who bears tax burden based on elasticity of demand and supply.
Analysis of the effectiveness of a junk food tax in terms of demand elasticity.
Discusses whether demand should be inelastic to effectively deter consumption.