Leases are a proprietary interest and an estate in land, existing at law or in equity.
Arises when a lessor/landlord confers on a lessee/tenant:
The right of exclusive possession of certain land.
For a period subject to a definite limit, or that can be made subject to a definite limit by either party.
Have both a proprietary and a contractual basis:
Both "an executory contract and an executed demise."
Grant of a lease completes the conveyance of a proprietary estate in land but remains partly executory as rights and obligations persist during the lease period.
There has been a "contractualisation" of leases, with courts exploring contract law for alternative remedies and as a basis for implied terms.
The court applies usual contract construction rules where the lease is written.
The primary basis of NZ law relating to leases is the common law.
Relevant statutory interventions:
Residential Tenancies Act 1986: Applies to residential leases within its scope.
Property Law Act 2007 (part 4): Applies to all other leases.
Māori Land and Leases
Māori customary and freehold land under the Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 is inalienable except:
For dispositions (including leases) effected by order of the Māori Land Court.
For leases of a term of not more than 3 years (including any terms of renewal).
Every title and interest in Māori customary land must be determined in accordance with tikanga Māori.
Essentials Required for the Creation of a Lease
Fixed or periodic term.
Certain premises.
Exclusive possession.
Proper Creation.
Rent is NOT an essential element of a lease, although it is an important indicator (Fatac Ltd (in liq) v Commissioner of Inland Revenue).
Lessor cannot confer on a lessee any right that the lessor doesn't possess (Gulf Harbour Investments Ltd v Rodney District Council).
Essentials of a Lease
Lease must have a time of commencement and a time of ending.
Must be express, implicit, or capable of being rendered certain from the outset of the term.
May be any length: day or millennia.
May be granted for a term that ensures regular but non-consecutive periods of enjoyment.
Periodic leases satisfy the certainty of a term requirement.
Each party can terminate the lease at the end of any period by giving appropriate notice (Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body).
Equitable Leases
Termination is based on the occurrence of a future event, PLA 2007 (s 212) provides for the creation of an equitable lease.
Future event must be sufficiently defined in the lease so that the event can be identified when it occurs.
Equitable interests cannot last for more than ten years; if the event has not occurred before the 10th anniversary of the data began, the lease automatically terminates on the 10th anniversary.
Certain Premises
The subject matter of a lease must be described and identified with certainty.
Generally not difficult to meet this requirement (All that needs to be done is the addition of the property's address).
Goldsworthy Mining Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1975):
Involved a lease to dredge a harbor to facilitate the transportation of iron ore.
The question was whether the description of the seabed in the agreement was sufficiently certain to support a lease agreement.
"No reason the law should not recognize a boundary capable of moving, so long as it was capable of ascertainment at any point in time."
Exclusive Possession
The legal right of exclusive possession is distinct from mere factual occupation.
Exclusive possession encompasses the right of excluding anyone from the land in law.
Scope of the right to exclude:
Lessee may exclude everyone, including the landlord (subject to the reservation of a limited right of entry by the landlord) (Radaich v Smith; Fatac Ltd (in liq) v Commissioner of Inland Revenue).
Freedom from control - Freedom of the lessee from any detailed supervisory control in respect of the use and occupation of the premises.
NZ approach:
Parties' subjective intention, or the label they have attached to the arrangement, is NOT decisive.
Agreement must be construed as a whole and in context to determine.
Proper Creation
No restriction on the length of term of a lease which may be registered.
Where the fixed term of a lease exceeds one year, a legal estate will not pass until a lease instrument in the appropriate form has been registered.
Under PLA 2007, only "short-term leases" (less than one year) do not require registration.
Short-term leases may be made orally or in writing and still amount to a legal interest in land.
It is not mandatory to register a lease, even if it exceeds one year, and in practice, many leases go unregistered.
An unregistered lease instrument for a fixed term of over one year has the effect of a deed (equitable remedies available).
Doctrine of Walsh v Lonsdale will apply:
Specific performance will be available, and parties' rights and liabilities will be determined according to the terms of the memorandum.
Types of Leases - 7 Variants
Fixed Term
A lease may be granted for any length of time, whether long or short, continuous or discontinuous.
Examples:
Lease of a residential apartment for a single term from 1 to 31 October 2021.
Lease of a commercial storefront for 3 years, with the possibility of renewal for an additional 3-year term.
Lease of a holiday home for the month of June, every year for 10 years.
Lease of farmland for 99 years.
May be assigned and will not determine on the death of the tenant; vests in the executors/administrators of the deceased tenant until the lease runs out.
Perpetual Leases
Not recognized at common law, a vernacular used term.
Phrase often inaccurately used to refer to perpetually renewable leases, which are for a fixed period and then perpetually renewable for the same period.
"Glasgow" leases: Usually for perpetually renewable periods of 14 or 21 years.
A type of arrangement common with charity - property put to a certain use without the transfer of ownership.
Have been used to grant terms that last over 100 years, de facto fee simple ownership, but with the right of termination.
Pastoral leases of Crown land granted under Land Act 1948: Farmers can lease/grant licenses crown land for long periods of time.
The Crown cannot sell much of its land due to statutory limitations, etc.; perpetual leases are therefore common.
Express Periodic Tenancies
Grant for a "period" (e.g., a week, month, year) that will continue to renew itself until either party terminates the lease by giving notice to quit.
Useful when there is uncertainty around the occupation of tenants.
Apparent exception to the common law requirement that the maximum duration of a lease must be certain at its beginning.
Inherent mechanism that either party can terminate the lease by giving sufficient notice (e.g., at common law, a 1-year lease required 6 months of notice).
The right of each party to give notice is inherent.
Most periodic tenancies are granted for a period of a year or a fraction of a year, falling under the definition of a "short-term lease" (PLA 2007).
Therefore, most periodic tenancies can be created orally or via writing without the need for registering under the LTA 2017 for a legal estate to pass.
May be assigned and will not determine on the death of the tenant; vests in the executors/administrators of the deceased tenant until terminated.
Implied Tenancies and Leases ("s 210 Leases")
S210 PLA 2007
Apply in specific circumstances not concerning residential tenancies.
Applies where:
The lessee is in possession of the land, but there is no agreement (express or implied) as to the duration of the term; or
The lessee remains in possession of the land with the lessor's consent, although the term of the lease has expired.
Terminable at will by either party, by 20 working days' written notice.
Not estates in land and not registrable under LTA 2017.
Leases that came into effect before 1 January 2008 cannot be s210 leases; common law rules apply.
Rebuttable presumption that a tenancy to which s 210 applies is determinable according to the 20 working days' notice period.
Parties can have a different notice period if parties intended this (based on rent paid weekly, monthly, etc.) as per a tenancy at will.
Where a tenant holds over on a s 210 lease, the terms of the original lease will apply insofar as they are not inconsistent.
Tenancy at Will
Created by express or implied agreement (e.g., parties previously had a lease fixed term, but the term ran out without another agreement being entered into).
But the conduct of the lessee and lessor (e.g., payment of rent, maintenance on property, etc.) imply an agreement between parties.
Confers exclusive possession on the occupier for an indefinite period.
The period may be terminated at any time, at the will of either party. No notice to quit is necessary to determine.
A hybrid - has characteristics of both licenses and periodic tenancies.
Tenant at will has no estate in the land and cannot assign the interest.
However, the tenant has an exclusive right of occupation and can maintain an action of trespass against a third party (unlike a licensee).
Relevant for residential and non-residential circumstances.
Express Tenancy at Will
Unusual; may arise in the "holding over" situation if the parties have agreed that this kind of arrangement should be recognized.
Not a short-term lease under the PLA - none of the protections under the PLA.
Express Tenancy at will override s210 lease for non-residential if express provision.
Implied Tenancy at Will - example
A prospective purchaser is let into possession before the completion of the land transfer.
A prospective tenant is allowed into occupation while negotiations for a lease are still continuing.
Tenant holds over after the expiry of a fixed term and before rent has been paid on a basis from which a periodic or s 210 lease can be implied.
Tenancy at Sufferance
Can only arise by operation of law; cannot be expressly created by the parties.
No tenure between the parties.
Lawful occupation of land in particular circumstances.
Results where a tenant holds over at the expiry of a fixed term without the consent or dissent of the landlord.
The absence of consent distinguishes the tenancy at sufferance from the tenancy at will.
The absence of dissent prevents a tenant at sufferance from being a trespasser (e.g., No communication around vacating, issuance of trespass, etc.).
Tenant at sufferance may maintain an action of trespass against a third party and may recover possession.
The tenant may leave at any time without notice.
The landlord may bring an action for use and occupation and may eject the tenant at any time.
Lease for Life
Under PLA 2007, in NZ, it is possible to create a lease for life without needing to specify a maximum fixed term of years and without it being a freehold estate (s 61).
Often used in conjunction with family trusts.
The owner sells the house to a family trust for current market value, subject to a lease for life.
Reduces the value of an individual's estate, maximizing their entitlement to asset-tested benefits and subsidies while also avoiding gift duty.
Also common in retirement villages.
In RTs, the death of the tenant usually is the determinative factor, but this is not the case for NRTs.
Parties' Rights and Obligations (Lease Covenants in General) - Most for NRT under PLA
Quiet Enjoyment
A covenant that secures the lessee against interruption by any means in the possession of the property leased.
Broken if acts of the landlord (or person acting as landlord agents) interfere physically and substantially with the tenant's possession.
The landlord may be in breach even if the act complained of is legal, on the landlord's own property, and arguably even if reasonably necessary (Owen v Gadd).
Commercial storefront lease, multiple entities operating in the same building.
The lessor had leased a shop on the ground floor to the lessee.
After they executed the lease, they put up scaffolding in front of the window of the shop because repairs were urgently necessary to the upper floor of the building.
The court found that putting up scaffolding was a breach of quiet enjoyment.
Implied at common law; codified under PLA 2007 (s218).
"Enjoyment" refers to the exercise and use of the right and having the full benefit of it, rather than deriving pleasure from it" (Kenny v Preen).
Norden v Blueport Enterprises
Commercial building, a software company operating on the bottom floor, upstairs another company was operating a brothel.
Loud noises and disruptions from above floor from escort agency.
Held that quiet enjoyment was breached, even though the landlord was not directly involved in brothel operation.
Remedies for Breach:
Injunction (to stop the interference)
Damages (including damages for mental upset and distress)
Exemplary damages may be available if the tort of trespass has also been committed.