The Mexican War led to significant territorial expansion for the U.S., but it also intensified the debate over slavery.
The central question became: What should be done about slavery in the newly acquired territories?
The Wilmot Proviso
Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the Wilmot Proviso during a congressional appropriations bill to pay for the Mexican War.
The proviso stated that "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any territories acquired from Mexico."
This sparked a heated debate in Congress, with congressmen voting along sectional lines (North vs. South) rather than party lines (Whigs vs. Democrats).
The proviso passed in the House but failed in the Senate.
Popular Sovereignty
Senator Lewis Cass proposed the idea of popular sovereignty, which would allow the citizens of each territory to decide the issue of slavery for themselves.
Popular sovereignty had different appeals, to different people:
Those hoping for free territories believed the people would vote against slavery.
Those hoping for slave territories believed the people would vote in favor of slavery.
The problem with popular sovereignty was indecision. The status of slavery would not be determined until settlers arrived and voted.
This discouraged Southern slaveholders from moving into the territories with their slaves, as they risked losing their property if the vote went against them.
Election of 1848
Lewis Cass was the Democratic nominee, running on the platform of popular sovereignty.
General Zachary Taylor was the Whig candidate. He was a Louisiana slaveholder but did not take a firm position on slavery in the territories.
Southerners hoped he would sympathize with their views.
Northerners were hopeful that his neutrality signaled a lack of support for the expansion of slavery.
Taylor was a war hero, which boosted his popularity. He had never even voted in a presidential election before.
Two sectional parties emerged:
John Calhoun ran on a Southern party ticket.
Martin Van Buren ran on the Free Soil Party ticket, advocating for free soil in the new territories.
Taylor won the election, capitalizing on his war hero status.
Key Issues and the Debate in Congress
California applied for statehood as a free state, threatening the balance of power between free and slave states.
The Texas-New Mexico border was in dispute and needed to be resolved.
Slavery existed in Washington D.C., prompting calls for its abolition in the nation's capital.
The Fugitive Slave Act needed to be addressed. Southerners sought a stronger law to ensure the return of runaway slaves.
The Compromise of 1850
Henry Clay attempted to address all these issues in one comprehensive bill, but it failed.
Clay became ill and died.
Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois took over, breaking the compromise into individual parts to be debated and voted on separately.
The strategy was successful, and the Compromise of 1850 was passed.
The compromise aimed to avert war by addressing sectional differences.
Provisions of the Compromise of 1850
California was admitted to the Union as a free state, upsetting the balance between free and slave states.
Popular sovereignty would be applied in the New Mexico and Utah territories.
The Texas-New Mexico border was settled, with Texas ceding the disputed territory, giving Texas its unique shape.
The slave trade was abolished in Washington D.C., but slavery itself remained legal.
A stronger Fugitive Slave Act was enacted to appease the South.
Fugitive Slave Act Details
Accused fugitive slaves were denied jury trials.
Their cases were heard by special commissioners, who were paid based on the outcome of the case:
$10 if they determined the person was a runaway slave.
$5 if they determined the person was free.
Northern citizens were required to assist in the return of fugitive slaves.
Reactions to the Compromise
The Compromise of 1850 temporarily resolved tensions, but it also exacerbated sectional divisions.
Northern states were infuriated by the Fugitive Slave Act.
Some Northern states passed personal liberty laws to obstruct the capture and return of runaway slaves, using state officials.
Abolitionists in the North were further motivated to end slavery nationwide.
Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom's Cabin was published, portraying the harsh reality of slavery and intensifying anti-slavery sentiment in the North.
The book was condemned in the South for its negative depiction of slavery.
Election of 1852 and New Parties
In the election of 1852, parties downplayed the slavery issue.