Teacher Expectations & Testing - EPSY 2130
Teacher Expectations & Testing
Quiz Reminders
- Quizzes are distributed at the beginning of class.
- No quizzes will be given out after the first 5 minutes of class.
- Your name should be written on the quiz.
- Quizzes are due at 8:15 AM.
Today’s Objectives
- Quiz
- Last in-person class!
- The last exam will be on May 1st at 8:00 am in the normal classroom.
- Teacher Expectations, Intro to Testing
- Activity
Teacher Expectations: Pygmalion Effect
- Pygmalion effect: Forming or crafting an ideal product based on your own expectations.
- As applied to teachers: Seeing potential in students and bringing it out of them.
Rosenthal & Jacobsen (1968)
- Experimentally tested the effect of teacher expectations on student learning.
- Students in grades 1-6 were given an IQ test.
- 20% of students were identified as “bloomers,” students expected to improve dramatically over the school year.
- The bloomers were randomly selected by the researchers.
- Students were not made aware of their identification (to avoid impacting self-efficacy).
- Teachers were not made aware of the deception.
Rosenthal & Jacobsen (1968) - Results
- By the end of the school year, younger “bloomers” showed more improvement than non-bloomers.
- The identification was considered a self-fulfilling prophecy (groundless expectation that ends up becoming true due to expectations).
- It was hypothesized that teachers saw potential in these students and acted in ways to bring out academic growth:
- High ability groups
- More interactions with the teacher
- More challenging lessons
- More opportunities to ask questions
- More praise
- More warmth
Teacher Expectations - Considerations
- Some disagreed with the findings, and some failures to replicate (might be specific to younger learners).
- Teacher expectations come from many sources:
- Prior experience with the student or close relatives.
- Some evidence that teachers think physically attractive students are more intelligent (halo effect).
- Stereotypes: teachers are more likely to have high expectations for some groups based on stereotypes than others.
- On average, teachers have higher expectations for high SES than low SES students.
- Higher expectations for Asian students > white students > Black/Hispanic students.
Teacher Expectations & Motivation
- Holding high standards for everyone is related to higher student goals and greater valuing of the subject.
- The effects of teacher expectations might be stronger for younger rather than older students.
- The effect may be stronger for low SES or racial minorities.
- The effect may be stronger in some subjects (math > reading).
Teacher Expectations - Prior Achievement & Impact
- Some teacher expectations are based on prior achievement.
- Sustaining expectation effect: student performance is maintained when teachers fail to recognize improvements.
- Pygmalion effect may be stronger for younger students.
- Sustaining expectation effect might take over as students get older.
- We have expectations for all students, but if we’re wrong, this could cost the student.
- Have high expectations for ALL!
Ability Grouping
- Ability grouping within classrooms is very common (~63%).
- It’s not clear that within-class ability grouping of students improves their learning.
- Becker et al. (2014) found that high-ability students who were tracked one year early had mixed results when compared to high-ability peers who were not.
- Students in low-ability groups may get less rigorous questions or have less choice.
- Ability grouping often becomes another kind of grouping (by SES, race/ethnicity, language).
Flexible Grouping
- Grouping and regrouping students based on learning needs.
- An alternative to true ability grouping.
- Evidence suggests it boosts students’ mastery of content.
- Rely on accurate, recent diagnosis of skills: assess continuously.
- Differentiate instruction to groups, not just pace: assure all work is meaningful.
- Discourage comparison between groups: don’t name groups.
- Group by ability on only one or two subjects.
Activity
- What has been your personal experience with testing?
- What is the best way to assess students?
- How do you make sense of assessment results?
Classroom Measurement Terms
- Measurement: an evaluation expressed in numeric terms.
- Assessment: procedures used to obtain information about student performance
- Formative assessment: ungraded testing used before or during instruction
- E.g., pretest: determine students pre-existing knowledge, readiness, abilities
- Aid in planning and diagnosis
- Interim (growth) assessment: given at regular intervals to determine change
- Summative assessment: “post-test” for achievement
- Standardized test: given under uniform conditions and scored using uniform procedures (typically at the state or national level).
Key Takeaways
- Motivation is a process (no such thing as an unmotivated student!)
- Learn from your students who have different backgrounds!
- Elaborative rehearsal → you remember things better when you make connections to what you already know!
- Care about your students as people!
Course Evaluations
- Please take a few minutes before the end of the semester to fill out the course evaluation here: https://webapps.franklin.uga.edu/evaluation/choose_eval.php