Comparative Economic and Environmental Analysis of Vehicles
Overview of Vehicle Types
Conventional Vehicles: Utilizes internal combustion engines, primarily running on gasoline or diesel.
Hybrid Vehicles: Combine conventional engines with electric propulsion, resulting in reduced fuel consumption and emissions.
Electric Vehicles (EV): Run entirely on electric power, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and decreasing greenhouse gases (GHG) when powered by renewable energy.
Importance of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles
Significant potential to reduce petroleum dependency and emissions related to road transport, which accounts for a large share of GHG emissions in the EU.
EU has prioritized alternative fuel technologies to combat rising GHG emissions and oil consumption, with substantial investment dedicated to electric vehicle technology.
Comparison of Vehicles in Greece
Analysis includes production and utilization stages; compares three vehicle types currently available in Greece:
Toyota Yaris (Conventional)
Toyota Prius (Hybrid)
Citroen C-Zero (Electric)
Comparison focuses on economic and environmental metrics, including lifecycle GHG emissions and air pollution output.
Lifecycle Analysis and Environmental Impact
Stage Consideration:
Production: Involves raw material extraction and manufacturing. Significant energy required, especially for battery production.
Utilization: Energy source for EVs is critical; emissions vary significantly based on electricity generation mix.
Key Findings:
In a low-carbon electricity scenario, EVs show drastically lower air pollution (5.76% of emissions) compared to conventional vehicles (61.4%).
The environmental advantages of EVs increase with cleaner energy input.
Electricity Generation Scenarios
Scenario A: Low carbon electricity, emissions lowest (~36 g CO2/kWh).
Scenario B: Medium carbon, more fossil fuel reliance (~428 g CO2/kWh).
Scenario C: High carbon, primarily from coal (820 g CO2/kWh).
Results indicate that the source of electricity greatly affects the competitiveness of electric vehicles.
Market Penetration of EVs in Greece
Growth impacted by economic conditions; suffered a dramatic drop in 2010 due to economic crisis.
Projected scenarios until 2025 estimate varying levels of hybrid and electric vehicle market shares ranging from 2% (Conservative) to 42% (Optimistic).
Conservative: Assumes minimal subsidies and a moderate increase in oil prices.
Realistic: Considers supportive policy measures and recovery from economic downturn.
Optimistic: Envisions strict climate policies, enhanced infrastructure, and broader acceptance of electric mobility.
Economic Analysis
Evaluates vehicle costs, fuel costs, and driving range per vehicle type.
Normalized Indicators:
Electric vehicles typically have high initial costs, but lower fuel and maintenance expenses over time.
Hybrid and electric vehicles often show lower GHG emissions compared to conventional vehicles across all scenarios, especially under cleaner electricity production conditions.
Conclusions
The study affirms that both hybrid and electric vehicles are crucial for reducing urban transport emissions.
Further development is necessary to improve EV efficiency and reduce costs.
Recommendations call for stronger policies and incentives for the uptake of electric vehicles, alongside investments in related infrastructure to support widespread adoption.