Topic 3.2_ Empires_ Administrations
Topic Overview
Empires and Administrations (1450-1750): Exploration of how various empires consolidated power during this period.
Divine Right of Kings
Definition: Monarchs were viewed as God's representatives on earth, holding both political and religious authority.
Implications:
Monarchs considered above the law; any opposition seen as blasphemy.
Justification for autocratic rule.
Methods of Power Consolidation
Control Mechanisms:
Taxes: Mandatory revenue systems to fund governance and military.
Military Control:
Established military as a profession with elite divisions for loyalty and higher pay.
Development of a standing army.
Religious Support: Engage religious leaders to gain legitimacy.
Building Projects: Utilize large-scale constructions to showcase power and influence.
Bureaucracy:
Extensive networks of officials managing state affairs; often founded on loyal captives.
Bureaucratic roles filled by trusted individuals to maintain control.
England’s Bureaucratic System
Tudor Developments:
Establishment of Justices of the Peace: Roles included maintaining peace, settling legal disputes, enforcing king's orders.
Evolution over time to increase power and legitimacy of the monarch against the nobility.
Legislative Authority in England
English Bill of Rights:
Limited monarch's powers and established parliamentary oversight.
Assured legal protections for citizens, emphasizing due process for detention and taxation.
Reinforced protections found in the Magna Carta.
French Absolute Monarchy
System Overview:
Complete authority vested in the king, employing the Divine Right.
Introduced Intendants: Royal officials tasked with enforcing the king's directives, functioning as tax collectors.
King Louis XIV “The Sun King”
Centralization of Power:
Famous quote: "L'état, c'est moi" emphasizes his absolute rule.
Strategies included keeping nobles close in court to reduce military rebellion or autonomy.
Established a legacy that later weakened France.
Russian Social Structure
Pre-Ivan IV Hierarchy:
Boyars: Landowning nobles.
Merchants: Middle economic class.
Peasants/Serfs: Indentured to landlords with minimal freedom.
Ivan IV and the Boyars
Conflict with Nobility:
Seized power from the Boyars who opposed his expansionist policies.
Founded Oprichnina: A secret police to enforce his rule and suppress dissent.
Romanov Dynasty Power Dynamics
Struggles for Power:
The Church sought to maintain traditional values.
Boyars aimed to regain lost power.
Romanovs pursued absolute authority.
Peter the Great’s Reforms
Military and Religious Control:
Defeated rivals, such as his half-sister, integrating opposition into his administration.
Reclaimed Russian Orthodoxy while enforcing reforms that led to tensions with clergy.
Reorganized Russia into administrative provinces, establishing loyalty through paid officials.
Ottoman Devshirme System
Recruitment of Janissaries:
Christian boys were taken and trained to serve the Sultan and function as elite military units.
Focus on providing administrative capabilities in conquered regions.
Ming and Qing Bureaucracy
Civil Service Exam:
Reinstituted under Ming to promote uniformity and competence within bureaucratic ranks.
Struggled with corruption in Qing, showcasing the need for oversight and reform.
Shogunate System in Japan
Feudal Structure:
Daimyo: Landowning feudal lords wielding power.
Samurai: Loyal warriors serving daimyo in a structured hierarchy.
Key Figures in Japan’s Unification
Nobunaga, Hideyoshi, and Ieyasu:
Nobunaga: Utilized foreign technology to expand territory.
Hideyoshi: Continued unification and moved the capital to Edo (Tokyo).
Ieyasu: Established Tokugawa Shogunate, initiating a period of prolonged peace through feudal governance.
Mughal Empire's Administrative Strength
Centralized Power:
Established a civil service with educated officials and allowed citizens to appeal directly to the emperor.
Zamindars: Overseers of land revenue, faced issues of corruption over time.
Differences in Administrative Systems
Comparison of European and Asian Systems:
Variations in governance styles, extent of bureaucratic influence, and cultural reliance on religious justification for authority.
Religious Influence on Governance
Utilization of Religion for Legitimacy:
Divine Right of Kings prevalent in Western Europe.
Askia of Songhai illustrated effective use of Islam to substantiate power.
Artistic Control and Power Representation
Construction of Iconic Structures:
Versailles: French expression of monarchical power.
St. Petersburg: Symbol of Peter the Great’s rule, showcasing forced labor techniques.
Taj Mahal: Reflection of Mughal architecture, blending Islamic and Hindu styles.
Topkapi Palace: Represents Ottoman artistic achievement and social culture.
Taxation as a Control Mechanism
Revenue Generation:
Russia's fluctuation between fostering private industry and tax-based control over peasants.
Tax farming practices in the Ottoman and Mughal empires leading to systemic corruption.
Ming Dynasty’s use of land taxes by wealthy citizens to ensure state revenue.