Introduction
American psychiatrist Aaron Beck (1967)
Cognitive approach to explaining vulnerability to depression
Focus on a person's cognitions and the way they think
Cognitive Vulnerability Components
Faulty Information Processing
Depressed individuals focus on negatives and ignore positives
Example: Winning £1 million but focusing on someone winning £10 million
Tendency towards black and white thinking
Negative Self-Schema
Schema as a mental framework for interpreting information
Self-schema: package of information about oneself
Negative self-schema leads to interpreting all self-related information negatively
The Negative Triad
Three types of negative thinking that occur automatically
Negative View of the World
Example: The world is a cold, hard place
Creates a sense of hopelessness
Negative View of the Future
Example: Little chance of economic improvement
Reduces hopefulness and enhances depression
Negative View of the Self
Example: I am a failure
Confirms low self-esteem and exacerbates depressive feelings
Cognitive Vulnerability
Refers to ways of thinking predisposing a person to depression
Includes faulty information processing, negative self-schema, and cognitive triad
Supported by research:
David Clark and Aaron Beck (1999) found cognitive vulnerabilities more common in depressed individuals
Joseph Cohen et al. (2019) confirmed cognitive vulnerabilities precede depression in a prospective study with 473 adolescents
Real-World Application
Screening and Monitoring
Assessing cognitive vulnerability helps screen individuals at risk of future depression
Allows for monitoring and early intervention
Treatment
Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) utilizes understanding of cognitive vulnerability
Alters vulnerable cognitions to increase resilience to depression
Clinical Practice
Cognitive vulnerability understanding is beneficial in screening, monitoring, and treatment of depression
Introduction
Depressed individuals exhibit distinct cognitive patterns.
Beck's theory of cognitive vulnerabilities as a partial explanation for depression.
Cognitive Vulnerabilities in Depression
Cognitive patterns observed before the onset of depression.
Beck's suggestion of cognitive vulnerabilities.
Limitations of Cognitive Explanations
Some aspects of depression not fully explained by cognitive theories.
Examples: extreme anger, hallucinations, delusions in some depressed individuals.
Evaluation of Cognitive Vulnerability
Assessing the adequacy of cognitive vulnerability as an explanation for depression.
Consideration of the limitations and exceptions to cognitive theories.
Conclusion
Reflect on whether cognitive vulnerability provides a comprehensive explanation for depression.
Encourage further exploration and research into alternative or complementary explanations.
Introduction
Explanation of Albert Ellis's cognitive explanation of depression
Definition of good mental health as a result of rational thinking
A Activating Event
Focus on situations triggering irrational thoughts by external events
Examples of negative events triggering irrational beliefs like failing a test or ending a relationship
B Beliefs
Identification of various irrational beliefs by Ellis
Examples of irrational beliefs such as "musturbation" and "I-can't-stand-it-itis"
C Consequences
Explanation of emotional and behavioral consequences of irrational beliefs
Example of how irrational beliefs can lead to depression when faced with failure
Conclusion
Summary of how the ABC model explains the impact of irrational thoughts on behavior and emotional state
Real-world Application of Ellis's ABC Model
Ellis's approach to cognitive therapy: Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)
REBT aims to alter irrational beliefs through vigorous argumentation
Evidence supporting REBT's effectiveness in changing negative beliefs and relieving depression symptoms
Strengths of Ellis's ABC Model
Real-world value in psychological treatment of depression
Application of REBT in altering irrational beliefs
Limitations of Ellis's ABC Model
Focuses on explaining reactive depression, not endogenous depression
Reactive depression linked to life events (activating events)
Endogenous depression not easily traceable to life events
ABC model less useful in explaining endogenous depression
Model provides only a partial explanation for depression cases
Brief overview of the ABC model in depression and REBT
Mention of the controversy surrounding the model's ethical implications
Locating responsibility solely with the depressed individual
Criticism of blaming the depressed person unfairly
Potential benefits when used appropriately and sensitively
Helping some individuals achieve resilience and improved well-being
Consideration of the overall impact on individuals
Examination of the balance between benefits and potential harm
Discussion on whether the benefits outweigh the ethical concerns
Summary of the ethical considerations surrounding the ABC model in depression and REBT
Reflection on whether REBT should be deemed unethical in the end