6.12 Understanding Variable Schedules of Reinforcement
Overview of Reinforcement Schedules
Introduction to Variable Schedules
Transition from fixed schedules to variable schedules
Focus on Variable Interval (VI) and Variable Ratio (VR) schedules.
Variable Interval Schedule (VI)
Definition: Reinforcement is based on the passage of time, but the amount of time is unpredictable.
Example: A rat in an operant chamber waits a variable amount of time to receive food.
Specific Scenario:
Variable interval of 100 seconds means:
One trial could require a wait of 110 seconds before reinforcement (lever press leads to food).
Another trial may need only 90 seconds.
Outcome: Average wait time results in a consistent level of responding.
Real-world Applications of Variable Interval Schedules
Meteor Showers:
Stargazing participants experience an unpredictable wait for shooting stars.
Average occurrence could be a shooting star every five minutes.
Workplace Context:
Supervisors (e.g., bosses) utilizing variable interval schedules to encourage consistent work.
Effectiveness vs. Fixed Interval:
Fixed schedules would cause workers to only work in anticipation of the boss’s presence (leading to scalloped responding pattern).
Use of variable schedules compels consistent productivity from employees.
Variable Ratio Schedule (VR)
Definition: Reinforcement based on an unpredictable number of behaviors (responses).
Example with the Rat:
Rat receiving food after an average of 10 lever presses:
One trial may require 12 presses, the next may only need 8 presses.
Outcome: Average across trials will suggest 10 presses yield food.
Behavioral Impact: Results in a high rate of responding in a short time frame.
Real-world Applications of Variable Ratio Schedules
Gambling Context:
Casinos and slot machines employ VR schedules to motivate behavior, sometimes leading to addiction.
The unpredictable rewards in gambling create a sense of anticipation that drives players to continue.
Motivation Effect:
The sense of control over outcomes increases motivation to perform the behavior (e.g., pressing the lever).
Unpredictable nature leads players to keep hoping for the next reward, making the experience addictive.
Comparative Analysis: Ratio Schedules vs. Interval Schedules
General Observations:
Ratio schedules, especially variable ones, lead to higher rates of responding compared to interval schedules.
This is due to the direct correlation to our actual responses, providing a sense of control and agency.
Partial Reinforcement Effect
Definition: Takes longer for individuals to experience extinction under partial reinforcement than under continuous reinforcement.
Analogies:
Continuous reinforcement example using a slot machine:
Winning every time creates a strong association; not winning easily recognizable results in quick abandonment of the machine.
In contrast, with partial reinforcement, inconsistent wins create a lower expectation of consistent feedback, allowing continued play despite losses.
Implications for Gambling Addiction
Understanding of Mechanisms:
Casinos utilize learning principles to enhance player retention and prolong engagement.
Use of both classical and operant conditioning principles:
Positive reinforcement (wins) via conditioned stimuli (flashing lights, sounds) elicits excitement and motivates further play.
Downside:
Disguising losses as wins impacts player perception; for example, players may feel they won even when they lost overall.
Scenario: Betting on multiple lines in a slot machine leading to perceived wins, but still incurring losses overall (e.g., betting $15 but receiving only $10).
Conclusion
Variable schedules, both interval and ratio, have significant applications in real-world contexts, particularly in motivating behaviors.
Understanding these mechanisms can shed light on issues of addiction and the influence of external stimuli in promoting certain behaviors.