Executive Power & Administrative Law – Week 1.1 Lecture Summary

Composition of the Executive Branch

  • "Executive" = the arm of government whose actions are the focus of administrative law.

  • Far broader than Cabinet or ministers alone; includes an extensive variety of people, offices, departments, agencies and quasi-government entities.

    • Constitutionally-recognised core:

    • s61s\,61: Executive power of the Commonwealth vested in the King, exercisable by the Governor-General.

    • s62s\,62: Federal Executive Council established to advise the Governor-General (in practice: PM + Cabinet + GG acting on advice).

    • Non-constitutional but legally significant components:

    • Government departments (e.g.

      • Home Affairs, Health, Defence, etc.).

    • Statutory authorities/bodies (e.g. ASIC, APRA, ACCC, CSIRO, Australian Institute of Sport).

    • Regulatory tribunals & commissions (e.g. Fair Work Commission, Electoral Commission).

    • Integrity institutions (Ombudsman, National Anti-Corruption Commission, Auditor-General, etc.).

    • Operational services: Police forces, public schools, TAFEs, universities created by statute (e.g. ANU), public hospitals, prisons.

    • State & Territory analogues of the above, plus municipal (local-government) instrumentalities.

    • Public servants at every level: teachers, corrections officers, tribunal members, ombudsman staff, policy analysts, etc. — all are part of the executive.

    • Scale illustration: Commonwealth Department of Finance PGPA Act schedule lists ~200 Commonwealth entities.

    • Colour-coding: Purple = non-corporate C’wealth entities; Green = corporate C’wealth entities (body corporate); Yellow = C’wealth-controlled corporations.

    • List would increase “exponentially” when State/Territory bodies added.

Outsourcing & Privatisation

  • Past few decades: marked shift of public powers to private contractors (e.g. Serco running immigration detention centres).

  • Raises accountability questions central to this course:

    • If a private firm exercises a public function, can we still access:

    • Ombudsman complaints?

    • Freedom of Information (FOI) rights?

    • Judicial review remedies?

    • Ongoing theme: How to “control public power” when performed by non-government actors.

Activities & Functions Undertaken by the Executive

  • Pervasive involvement in everyday life:

    • Licensing (driver’s, liquor, gambling).

    • Welfare (Centrelink payments, disability support, pensions).

    • Public transport planning & operation.

    • Roads, garbage collection, water & electricity regulation.

    • Internet/telecommunications regulation.

    • Public health (Medicare, hospitals) & research funding.

  • Higher-level or systemic functions:

    • Tax collection, police services, anti-corruption oversight.

    • Running prisons & immigration detention.

    • Foreign affairs: treaty-making, diplomatic relations, (hopefully not) declaration of war.

  • Administrative law interest: ensuring limits on these powers exist & are enforceable.

    • Hypothetical issues: wrongful licence cancellation, incorrect welfare refusal, council stops bin collection → What remedies?

Sources of Executive Power (4 primary categories)

1. Statute (principal focus of course)

  • Parliament grants power to executive officials & bodies by legislation.

    • Examples:

    • C’wealth minister empowered to grant visas.

    • NSW law establishing a Liquor Licensing Authority.

  • Delegated (subordinate) legislation: Legislature confers regulation-making power on executive.

    • E.g. Minister sets visa conditions by regulation.

  • Statutory interpretation is crucial; administrative law often turns on reading the provision’s “legal reach”.

2. Prerogative Powers (historical Crown powers)

  • Exclusive to the executive at the highest level; e.g.

    • Treaty execution.

    • Declaration of war.

    • Coining money.

    • Conferring honours (e.g. Order of Australia).

  • Parliament can abrogate or modify prerogatives by statute.

  • Courts wrestle with justiciability of certain prerogative exercises (topic later in course).

3. Nationhood Power

  • Inherent powers derived from Australia’s status as a sovereign nation (distinct from UK-inherited prerogatives).

    • High Court “Pape” case: allowed stimulus payments during GFC absent explicit statutory basis.

4. Common-Law / “Legal Personhood” / General Capacity Powers

  • Executive acts as a legal person: enter contracts, own property, sue & be sued.

  • Williams (School Chaplains) cases: Commonwealth spending/contracts require support from a valid constitutional or statutory source; general capacity is not unlimited.

Multi-Level Structure of Executive Power

Federal / Commonwealth Level

  • Source-identifiers: Federal statute, Commonwealth department, federal minister.

  • Sources of power

    • Statutes enacted pursuant to s51s\,51 heads (e.g. s51(ix)s\,51\,(ix) quarantine → Quarantine Act; s51(ii)s\,51\,(ii) taxation → Tax Acts, etc.).

    • Prerogative, nationhood & common-law capacities also apply.

  • Executive Review (internal/administrative)

    • Merits review: Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) – successor to Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).

    • Investigatory bodies:

    • Commonwealth Ombudsman (maladministration complaints, incl. Centrelink).

    • National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) – corruption inquiries.

    • Auditor-General – mismanagement of public funds.

    • FOI: Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).

  • Judicial Review

    • High Court: s75(v)s\,75\,(v) Constitution (constitutional writs).

    • Federal Court:

    • Judiciary Act 1903 (mirrors s75s\,75 jurisdiction).

    • ADJR Act 1977 (Cth) – statutory review.

    • Federal Circuit Court: judicial review under ADJR Act as conferred.

State / Territory Level (example: New South Wales)

  • Identifier: State statute, state minister/agency (e.g. NSW Minister for Environment).

  • Sources of power

    • State plenary legislative power (subject only to constitutional limits, intergovernmental immunities, etc.).

    • State prerogative & common-law capacities.

  • Executive Review

    • Merits review: NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).

    • Investigatory bodies:

    • NSW Ombudsman, ICAC, Auditor-General.

    • Information access: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) – “GIPA”.

  • Judicial Review

    • Supreme Court of NSW – common-law review jurisdiction preserved by s69s\,69 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW).

    • No state equivalent of ADJR Act → relies on common-law grounds (some codified).

Local Government Level

  • Created by state legislation (not constitutionally entrenched).

    • Powers: development approvals, local services (garbage, libraries, parking, etc.).

  • Review & oversight channels = same as state level (because source of power is state statute):

    • NCAT for merits review where statute allows.

    • NSW Ombudsman, ICAC, GIPA Act.

    • Supreme Court s69s\,69 judicial review.

Administrative Law’s Two Core Tasks (re-emphasised)

  1. Identify & interpret the legal limits on executive power in any given instance (primarily statutory, but also prerogative, nationhood, common-law).

  2. Enforce those limits through suitable mechanisms when power is exceeded:

    • Executive mechanisms (merits review, Ombudsman, integrity bodies, FOI).

    • Judicial review (courts issuing constitutional/statutory writs).

Practical & Ethical Significance

  • Government’s pervasive role means unlawful decisions can directly affect daily life (licence, welfare, garbage, visas).

  • Outsourced or privatised functions complicate accountability → recurring theme.

  • Separation of powers is horizontal (Legislature/Judiciary/Executive) and vertical (Commonwealth/State/Local); choosing the wrong level misdirects the entire review strategy (common exam pitfall).

Study & Exam Advice

  • Master statutory interpretation: meaning, purpose, context – critical for judicial review problem questions.

  • Know the institutional map (which tribunal, which court, which Ombudsman at which level).

  • Grasp distinctions between merits review (correct/ preferable decision) and judicial review (legality only).

  • Be ready to discuss justiciability of prerogative and high-policy decisions.

  • Keep revisiting outsourcing examples (e.g. Serco detention) when analysing FOI, Ombudsman jurisdiction, and reviewability.