Lecture 6 - The self: self-concept & self-esteem
self-concept
what we know about ourselves
directs and regulates our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors
lets us seek out situations that match our capabilities
personal goals determine emotional responses
sources of our self-concept
perception of our own behavior
own thoughts and feelings
others’ reactions
social comparison
own behavior, thoughts, feelings
own behavior
self-perception theory (Bem, 1967)
we make inferences about our personal characteristics on the basis of our overt behaviors
when internal cues are weak or ambiguous
when we do noit have a good sense of who we are in a particular domain
when we choose a behavior rather than doing it for some external reason
intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation (Lepper at al. 1973)
imagery exercises, mental training
own thoughts and feelings
more reliable sources for inference than behavior (Andersen, 1984)
others’ reactions to us
“looking glass self” (Cooley, 1902)
explains how our self-concept develops through our perception of how others see us
key components:
we imagine how we appear to others
we imagine how others judge that appearance
we develop feelings about ourselves based on these perceptions
It highlights the importance of social interaction in the development of the self.
reactions serve as a kind of mirror, reflecting our image (e.g. Miller et al., 1975)
Direct and indirect (subtle) cues
social comparison
social comparison theory (festinger, 1954)
self-concept is often shaped by comparisons between ourselves and others
the most accurate information about themselves by seeking out similar others for comparison
contrast effect - an effect of a comparison standard or prime that makes the perceiver’s judgement more different from the standard
assimilation effect - an effect of a comparison standard or prime that makes the perceiver’s judgement more similar to the standard
uniqueness - attributes that distinguish us from most others become central (can change; McGuire & McGuire, 1981)
Knowledge about us vs. others
greater quantity and variety of cues
more time and situations
us: flexible/adaptable; others: rigid
inner thoughts and emotions
even if the behavior is the same, thoughts and emotions behind it can differ
we are aware of our inner reactions to different external stimuli (see actor-observer bias)
alternative attributions for us than for others (but motivation can overwrite it)
not necessarily more accurate
Multiple selves
our typical behaviors, thoughts, and feelings depend on what we are doing
self-aspects - summaries of a person’s beliefs about the self in specific domains, roles, or activities
self-complexity - the extent to which a person possesses many and diverse self-aspects
yet, individuals come to have a sense of unity and constancy about themselves
self-schema - few core attributes we believe characterize us uniquely among people and consistently across situations
only a subset of our self-knowledge and self-aspects is accessible at any time
selective memory - we tend to forget inconsistencies
a coherent self-schemata is less important in collectivist cultures
self-esteem
the positive or negative evaluation of the self - how we feel about it
a signal of how well we are doing in successfully adapting to our social world
trait vs. state
accuracy vs. self-enhancement - wobegon effect - it describes the self-enhancement bias: most people believe they are better than average on positive traits.
Examples:
90% of drivers think they're better-than-average.
Students think they're more ethical or intelligent than their peers.
self-esteem & social comparison
self-evaluation maintenance model (Tesser, 1988)
closeness of the other & centrality of the attribute in the self-concept
determines how others’ performance (vs. ours) affects our self-esteem
choice for comparison target is motivated (less successful/more unfortunate)
differences related to self-esteem
gender
women - connectedness
men - sucesses/failures
culture
lower level of reported self-esteem in collectivist countries
= self-criticism - how I fulfill my obligations
domain specific self-enhancement - being outstanding/adaptable