House of Lords
Structure
Types of peers
Hereditary
Limited to 92
Bishops/religious leaders
Chosen by PMs
People’s peers
2001- appointments commission established to ensure a more transparent and merit-based process for appointing members to the House of Lords
76 by 2024
Roles
of Peers
Influence debates on national issues
Scrutinise legislation
Check small details of legislation
Question the govt representative
Advocate for marginalised groups
Delay legislation (not vetoing)
Legislation
1911 Act - Lords have no legislative control over financial matters
Scrutinise proposed legislation by proposing amendments to the HoC
Plmtary ping-pong can go on for a year before the HoC can override the HoL’s delaying of the bill
E.g. Sexual Offences Amendment Act 2000
HoL secondary legislation scrutinising committee considers all secondary legislation and decides what proposals may cause concern
Also check for errors in wording and meaning with the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments
Scrutiny
Limited in their role of scrutiny of senior ministers as most of them sit in the HoC
The HoL lacks the means and methods to scrutinise actions beyond junior ministers
Advantage in scrutinising legislation as members are experts in their fields
Represent interests and causes in society
Committee stage of bill important due to
Improving legislation
Adding clauses to protect vulnerable minorities
Clarifying meaning
Removing ineffective sections
Representation
Improved as Lords not elected so no party majority
Better range of views and opinions
No worries about constituents or being re-elected
Ability to focus on groups from across society
Non-political backgrounds mean they have a greater wealth and range of experience
Power of whips is weaker
Peers can represent small parties that struggle to win seats in the HoC
UKIP had 5 peers until 2019 when they became independent
More opportunities to speak about marginal interests
Expresses ‘national will’ when a national issue that surpasses party politics arises
Lords bring the moral/ethical dimension
Social representation terrible
January 2025- 799 members
Con- 272
Lab- 185
Crossbencher- 184
LibDem- 77
Non-affiliated and others- 81
Gender
560 men, 239 women
Lab- 76 female peers
Con- 67 female peers
Age (Oct 24)
Av age 71
Ethnicity
2018- 6%
2000- 3%
Effectiveness: