Duopoly and Product Differentiation Notes

Duopoly and Product Differentiation

Learning Objectives

  • Understand product differentiation.
  • Understand the Hotelling model.
  • Understand location equilibrium.
  • Understand minimum product differentiation.
  • Understand maximum product differentiation.
  • Understand product differentiation and consumer preference.

What is Product Differentiation

  • (Supply) condition for product differentiation
  • Monopolistic competition and oligopoly (focus).
  • Oligopoly: homogenous or differentiated products
Horizontal Product Differentiation
  • If two products AA and BB are sold at the same price, consumers have no consensus on which one is preferred.
  • Relative: some prefer AA, while others prefer BB.
Vertical Product Differentiation
  • If two products AA and BB are sold at the same price, all consumers prefer one over the other.
  • Absolute: all consumers prefer AA to BB, or BB to AA.
Horizontal vs Vertical Product Differentiation
  • Example: Business class vs. economy class for airlines

Product Differentiation and the Hotelling Model

  • How to describe a product
    • A set of utility-bearing attributes
    • Differentiation: one or more of the attributes are different
  • How to analyze product differentiation
    • AA and BB are identical on all attributes but one (a1a_1)
    • AA and BB are differentiated on a1a_1
    • Products to be differentiated on one attribute at a time
  • Example: Two restaurants selling the same burger
    • McDonald’s
    • Burger King

Basics of the Hotelling Model

  • A market with two firms
    • Duopoly: F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 compete
    • LL-mile-long street (L > 0)
  • Supply side
    • F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 sell the same product but their locations could be different
    • No constraints on production capacity
    • Same marginal cost: c<em>1=c</em>2=cc<em>1 = c</em>2 = c
    • Same price given: p<em>1=p</em>2=pp<em>1 = p</em>2 = p
  • Demand side
    • Consumers uniformly distributed
    • Each consumer incurs transportation cost: tt per mile (t > 0)
    • Each consumer has the same willingness to pay

How F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 Compete

  • F<em>1F<em>1’s profit: π</em>1=(p<em>1c</em>1)q<em>1=(pc)q</em>1\pi</em>1 = (p<em>1 - c</em>1)q<em>1 = (p - c)q</em>1
  • F<em>2F<em>2’s profit: π</em>2=(p<em>2c</em>2)q<em>2=(pc)q</em>2\pi</em>2 = (p<em>2 - c</em>2)q<em>2 = (p - c)q</em>2
What Determines Firm Profit
  • Quantity demanded
  • Location of firms

Product Differentiation in the Hotelling Model

  • Product differentiation and location choice
    • F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 choose same location: no product differentiation
    • F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 choose different locations: product differentiation
  • Consumer choice
    • Same location: consumers have no preference
    • Different locations: consumers have preference
  • Hotelling model explains product differentiation
    • Location choice (long run): product differentiation on location
    • Pricing (short run): given locations, what about price?

Deriving the Location Equilibrium

  • Location equilibrium and the minimum product differentiation (unique)

The Minimum Product Differentiation

  • Location equilibrium is unique
    • F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 locate back to back in the center
    • The minimum product differentiation
Key Implications
  • Location equilibrium is realized in the long run: products eventually look very similar
  • Minimum product differentiation is not unique
  • Price competition with minimum product differentiation
    • No market power: p<em>1=p</em>2=cp<em>1 = p</em>2 = c
    • Zero economic profit: π<em>1=π</em>2=0\pi<em>1 = \pi</em>2 = 0

Pricing in Maximum Product Differentiation

  • Degree of product differentiation
    • Product differentiation: F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 locate differently
    • Minimum product differentiation: same location
Maximum Product Differentiation
  • F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 must locate at two ends
  • Maximum product differentiation is unique, but not stable

Pricing in Maximum Product Differentiation

  • Assume F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2 cannot change their locations
    • In the short run: firms cannot change locations
    • Only possible behavior: pricing through undercutting
  • In equilibrium, consumer ii is indifferent
    • Quantity demanded for F<em>1F<em>1: q</em>1=xq</em>1 = x
    • Quantity demanded for F<em>2F<em>2: q</em>2=Lxq</em>2 = L - x

Derive the Demand Functions

  • Consumer surplus
FirmPriceTransportation costConsumer surplus
Buying from F1F_1p1p_1txtxr(p1+tx)r - (p_1 + tx)
Buying from F2F_2p2p_2t(Lx)t(L - x)
  • Condition of equilibrium
    • rp<em>1+tx=rp</em>2+t(Lx)r - p<em>1 + tx = r - p</em>2 + t(L - x)
  • We obtain the demand functions
    • q<em>1=x=p</em>2p12t+L2q<em>1 = x = \frac{p</em>2 - p_1}{2t} + \frac{L}{2}
    • q<em>2=Lx=p</em>1p22t+L2q<em>2 = L - x = \frac{p</em>1 - p_2}{2t} + \frac{L}{2}

Profit Maximization for F<em>1F<em>1 and F</em>2F</em>2

  • F<em>1F<em>1’s and F</em>2F</em>2’s profit functions
    • π<em>1=(p</em>1c)q<em>1=(p</em>1c)(p<em>2p</em>12t+L2)\pi<em>1 = (p</em>1 - c)q<em>1 = (p</em>1 - c)(\frac{p<em>2 - p</em>1}{2t} + \frac{L}{2})
    • π<em>2=(p</em>2c)q<em>2=(p</em>2c)(p<em>1p</em>22t+L2)\pi<em>2 = (p</em>2 - c)q<em>2 = (p</em>2 - c)(\frac{p<em>1 - p</em>2}{2t} + \frac{L}{2})
  • Let marginal profit equal zero (F1F_1)
    • π<em>1p</em>1=p<em>2p</em>12t+L2p1c2t=0\frac{\partial \pi<em>1}{\partial p</em>1} = \frac{p<em>2 - p</em>1}{2t} + \frac{L}{2} - \frac{p_1 - c}{2t} = 0
    • p<em>1=p</em>2+Lt+c2p<em>1 = \frac{p</em>2 + Lt + c}{2}
  • Let marginal profit equal zero (F2F_2)
    • π<em>2p</em>2=p<em>1p</em>22t+L2p2c2t=0\frac{\partial \pi<em>2}{\partial p</em>2} = \frac{p<em>1 - p</em>2}{2t} + \frac{L}{2} - \frac{p_2 - c}{2t} = 0
    • p<em>2=p</em>1+Lt+c2p<em>2 = \frac{p</em>1 + Lt + c}{2}

Maximum Product Differentiation

  • In equilibrium:
    • p<em>1=p</em>2=Lt+cp<em>1 = p</em>2 = Lt + c
    • π<em>1=π</em>2=12L2t\pi<em>1 = \pi</em>2 = \frac{1}{2}L^2t
Implications for Maximum Product Differentiation
  • Market power: p1 = p2 > c
  • Positive economic profit: \pi1 = \pi2 > 0
  • Price and profit depend entirely on LL and tt

Consumer Preference and Product Differentiation

  • LL: Dispersion of consumer preference
  • Two extremes: L=0L = 0 and LL \rightarrow \infty

Intensity of Consumer Preference

  • tt: Intensity of consumer preference
  • Two extremes: : t=0t = 0 and tt \rightarrow \infty

Consumer Preference and Product Differentiation

  • Consumer preference
    • No consumer preference: L=0L = 0, or t=0t = 0, given the other, then products cannot be differentiated
    • Extremely strong preference: LL \rightarrow \infty, or tt \rightarrow \infty, then products can be differentiated anyway
  • Consumer preference product differentiation
    • Consumer preference is the precondition for product differentiation
    • Product differentiation is the manifestation of consumer preference

List of Concepts/Terms Covered in Sequence

  • horizontal product differentiation
  • vertical product differentiation
  • Hotelling model
  • duopoly
  • location choice
  • location equilibrium
  • minimum product differentiation
  • maximum product differentiation
  • consumer preference
  • dispersion of consumer preference
  • intensity of consumer preference