HLTH WEEK 2 PPT
HLTH 300 - WEEK 2: Population Health and Social Epidemiology
Instructor: Laura Lee
Date: September 9, 2025
TERRITORIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Acknowledgement of the Lekwungen-speaking peoples, the Songhees, Esquimalt, and WSÁNEĆ peoples.
Recognition of their traditional territory on which the university stands.
Statement of respect for the ongoing historical relationships these communities have with the land.
OPENING ACTIVITY
Questions Presented:
What everyday factors (outside of doctors and hospitals) most shape people’s health?
Which of these factors do you think are most unequally distributed in society?
Method: Discussion on whiteboard.
DAHLGREEN & WHITEHEAD MODEL
Source: Dahlgreen, G. and Whitehead, M. (1991). "Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health." Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.
Further Learning: Video link provided for detailed understanding.
SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH
Key Factors:
Trauma
Living environment: unsafe and/or unhealthy settings
Exclusion: Marginalization, Racism & Discrimination
Economic factors: Low wages and employment challenges
Abuse and lack of safety
Gender inequity
Homelessness & Housing Instability
Access barriers: Lack of Access to health services
Environmental factors affecting health
Educational opportunities and literacy levels
Employment & Working Conditions: Precarious Employment and Workplace Stress
Psychological stress impacting mental health and addictions
Biological & Genetic Endowment: referring to inherent health predispositions
Social support networks shaping health outcomes
AUTHORITY ON FIRST NATIONS HEALTH
Source: First Nations Health Authority, www.fnha.ca
Wellness Perspective:
Emphasis on a visual and comprehensive framework of wellness as understood by First Nations, passed down from Elders.
Recognition that wellness is intrinsic to every human being, thus unique for each individual.
Components of Wellness Framework:
Social, Emotional, Physical, Mental, Spiritual aspects of health.
Community, Cultural respect, Responsibility, and Economic relations play critical roles.
Land as a foundational aspect impacting relationships and health.
FIGURE 3: The Social Determinants of Health - An Indigenous View
Key Elements Included:
Access to Health Services
Personal Health & Coping Skills
Importance of Culture, Language, and Ceremony
Social Inclusion measures
Education and Early Childhood development factors.
Recognition of Environmental and Social responsibilities.
CONDITIONS AND FORCES THAT SHAPE OUR LIVES
Neighborhood & Built Environment:
Importance of housing safety, food access, and transportation systems.
Education Access & Quality:
Lifelong learning opportunities necessary for individual development.
Economic Stability:
Role of income, employment, and food security in health outcomes.
Social & Community Context:
Value of social support, community ties, and the impact of discrimination.
Broader Forces and Systems:
Socioeconomic & Political contexts influencing health-policy and systems.
Addressing structural discrimination including Racism, Classism, and Gender disparities.
KEY PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH (SDOH)
Social Gradient:
Health deteriorates as socioeconomic status decreases.
Health Inequities:
Unfair, avoidable differences in health outcomes between groups.
Root Causes:
Health outcomes are influenced by non-medical factors, not solely by healthcare access.
Interconnectedness:
Determinants are interlinked and evolve over time.
Further Exploration: Participants encouraged to think of other health-related principles.
DEFINING SOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Core Focus:
Examining how social position and context influence health outcomes.
Expansive approach beyond individual risk factors.
Four Features Identified:
Population-level perspective
Social context of behavior analysis
Multi-level analysis techniques
Life-course perspective in health studies
GEOFFREY ROSE & POPULATION HEALTH
Considered the Father of Population Health.
Distinction made between "sick individuals" vs. "sick populations."
High-Risk Approach:
Focus on high-risk individuals has limited impact on overall population health.
Population Approach:
Advocates for shifting the health distribution across entire populations, not just targeting individuals.
THE HEALTH GRADIENT
Observation:
Health improves consistently with increased income, education, and job status.
Evidence:
Supported by Whitehall Studies comparing health among clerks and executives, showing a persistent health gradient.
The Black Report indicates health gaps widen despite universal healthcare access.
Key Finding:
Health gradient observed across all socioeconomic levels, not just between extremes.Source for Further Reading: Marmot M. (2017). "The health gap: Doctors and the social determinants of health." Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. doi:10.1177/1403494817717448
WILKINSON & INEQUALITY
Core Assertion:
Societies that are affluent but have significant inequality demonstrate worse overall health outcomes.
Mechanism:
Inequality sparks increased stress levels and erodes social solidarity.
Outcome:
Chronic diseases are more prevalent in societies where inequality is pronounced.
THREE FRAMEWORKS IN UNDERSTANDING HEALTH
Materialist Framework:
Health outcomes influenced by accessible resources like income, stable housing, and ample nutrition. Lack of these resources correlates with illness risks.
Neo-Materialist Framework:
Extends beyond individual resources to include public goods/services distribution, influenced by policies, taxation, welfare programs, and neighborhood infrastructure impacts on health.
Psychosocial Framework:
Posits that health is affected by relative social position; inequality causes chronic stress that erodes social trust and leads to unhealthy behaviors such as smoking and alcohol use, with adverse biological effects like elevated blood pressure.
BREAKOUT ROOM ACTIVITY
Instructions:
Choose a current health issue to discuss from provided list or others (examples: obesity, opioid crisis, housing insecurity, mental health issues, food insecurity, climate change and health issues, maternal child health).
Guiding Questions:
How is the chosen issue typically approached at individual levels?
What would a population health approach entail for this issue?
Which social determinants of health apply to the chosen topic?
Optionally, discuss which framework (materialist, neo-materialist, psychosocial) best explains the persistence of inequities related to the issue.
Outcome:
Summarize one or two critical points to share back with the class.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Holistic Understanding of Health:
Acknowledgement that health is influenced by factors beyond healthcare setups (e.g., environmental conditions, social systems).
Geoffrey Rose's Contributions:
Importance of shifting focus from high-risk individuals to whole population distributions for significant health improvements.
Existence of Health Gradient:
Recognition that health inequities span the social spectrum, affecting all levels of society, not solely the poorest compared to the richest.
Impact of Inequality:
Notable that greater inequality correlates with worse overall health outcomes.
Frameworks for Analysis:
Emphasis on materialist, neo-materialist, and psychosocial perspectives as valuable in explaining persistent health inequities.
LOOKING AHEAD
Reading for Upcoming Week:
NCCDH report on Universal and Targeted Approaches to Health Equity.
Next Focus:
Week 3 will cover Income, Inequality & Health Inequities.
Current Affairs Journal:
Assignments to connect learned concepts to selected current news stories.
Upcoming Discussions:
Class discussions anticipated for further exploration.