Capitalism undergoes continuous evolutionary changes:
Relatively stable regimes with dominant sectors and technologies may exist, but they are always succeeded by new structures.
19th Century: Factory and workshop systems allowed varied outputs but limited in scale.
20th Century: Keynesian-Fordist era utilized automated assembly lines for mass production, reducing variety.
21st Century: Global competition enhances economies of scale with increased product variety.
Schumpeter's analysis predicted continuous capital intensification and industrial concentration.
He argued that market coordination would shift towards oligopoly and monopoly, requiring government intervention.
Nationalization of industries seen as an inevitable outcome of capitalism dynamics.
Historical context shows Schumpeter’s views were not manifested as he anticipated.
By the late 1970s, political shifts in Britain and the U.S. initiated a new era of conservative regulation to tackle 1970s crises.
Counter-cyclical policies from the past didn't hold under the new regime.
Thatcher-Reagan Era:
Cutbacks in welfare and labor union strength; resurgence of market forces in a globalized context.
Emergence of digital technologies began reshaping production and labor divisions.
Fordism characterized by routinization, repetition, and standardization aimed at minimizing costs.
High productivity from assembly lines, but inflexibility restricts output variation.
Some industries utilized flexible methods, contradicting rigid Fordist frameworks.
Influence of early lean production and flexible specialization emerged by the late 1960s.
Neofordism: High scale production coupled with flexibility and product variety.
Japanese adoption of neofordism deepened Fordism's crisis in the West.
Flexible specialization revitalizes elements of 19th-century craft production, particularly through computerization.
More adaptable production units arise, catering to niche markets with high-quality outputs.
Growth of flexible labor markets facilitated by the erosion of labor unions, leading to more part-time and temporary roles.
Income disparities increase, with the upper labor segment benefiting significantly compared to declining wages in production and service jobs.
Piketty and Saez highlight growing inequality, showcasing CEO compensation skyrocketing compared to average wages.
New labor divisions arise with cognitive and cultural labor gaining prominence.
Digital technologies facilitate the displacement of routine work and enhance roles requiring creativity and interpersonal skills.
Upper labor tier: Well-paid, qualified cognitive workers driven by personal talents in less regimented environments.
Analysis of professional vs. production vs. service labor in the U.S. demonstrates dramatic shifts.
Professional occupations grow despite economic downturns; production workers diminishing rapidly.
Low-wage service worker numbers rise slowly, demonstrating resilience against automation.
Cultural industries showing rapid growth globally, with varying local expressions.
Cultural outputs: Includes film, music, and design industries gaining critical importance and penetrating global markets.
Historical trajectory of globalization from the 19th century peaks, influenced by the 20th-century upheavals.
Post-Cold War era sees resurgence in global trade, leading to unprecedented interconnectedness of capitalist systems.
Uneven economic and social developments noticeable in emerging markets alongside traditional powers.
The cognitive-cultural economy indicates a shift towards higher symbolic value and consumer goods flexibility.
Capitalism’s new configuration points to both opportunities for growth and challenges, especially regarding regulatory shifts at national and global levels.