Liberty
Arguing About Philosophy Series
This series provides an introduction to key subjects in philosophy with a vibrant set of readings designed to intrigue new students.
Unlike standard anthologies that feature outdated extracts, this collection includes fresh philosophical text paired with often neglected readings from related disciplines like popular science, film, and fiction.
Each volume is curated by notable editors who introduce and contextualize the readings, making it an engaging starting point for diving into philosophical discussions.
Individual Volumes in the Series
Arguing About Knowledge
Edited by Duncan Pritchard and Ram NetaArguing About Law
Edited by John Oberdiek and Aileen KanvanaghArguing About Metaethics
Edited by Andrew Fisher and Simon KirchinArguing About the Mind
Edited by Brie Gertler and Lawrence ShapiroArguing About Art (3rd Edition)
Edited by Alex Neill and Aaron RidleyArguing About Metaphysics
Edited by Michael ReaArguing About Political Philosophy
Edited by Matt ZwolinskiArguing About Religion
Edited by Kevin TimpeForthcoming Volume
Arguing About Language
Edited by Darragh Byrne and Max Kolbel
Publication Information
First Published: 2009 by Routledge, New York and London
ISBN Data:
ISBN-10: 0-415-99078-5 (hbk)
ISBN-10: 0-415-99079-3 (pbk)
ISBN-13: 978-0-415-99078-3 (hbk)
ISBN-13: 978-0-415-99079-0 (pbk)
Library of Congress Cataloging Info:
Arguing about political philosophy / Matt Zwolinski, editor.
Chapter 33: John Stuart Mill - On Liberty
Overview of John Stuart Mill
Life Span: 1806-1873
Contribution: A prominent British philosopher and co-founder of the moral philosophy of utilitarianism alongside Jeremy Bentham.
Key Work: Mill's essay "On Liberty" (1859).
Harm Principle
Definition: The only legitimate grounds for interfering with an individual's liberty is to prevent harm to others.
Purpose: Acknowledging this principle limits society's authority over individuals significantly.
Distinction of Liberties
Civil/ Social Liberty: The nature and limits of power that society can legitimately exercise over individuals.
Historical Context: The historical struggle between Liberty and Authority traces back to ancient civilizations like Greece, Rome, and England.
Evolution of Liberty Concepts
Earlier notions of liberty involved protection against tyranny of rulers, manifested through political liberties or rights.
Modern concepts have evolved to see rulers as tenants or delegates instead of opposing forces, aligning rulers' interests with the governed's.
Authority’s Limits
The limitation of government power remains essential even in democratic contexts to prevent the tyranny of the majority.
Mill argues that society can exert pressure through public opinion, creating a social tyranny that could be more invasive than political oppression.
Individual Sovereignty
Individuals retain sovereignty over themselves, their bodies, and minds, as long as their actions do not harm others.
Applicability: This doctrine applies primarily to mature individuals, excluding children or those needing protection.
Self-Protection in Law
Individuals may be compelled legally to prevent harm to others but not for their personal good or happiness as mandated by others.
Human Development and Autonomy
Personal liberty includes the freedom to think, express opinions, pursue one's own tastes, and associate freely as long as such actions do not harm others.
Society's duty is to respect these liberties while maintaining a balance against actions that harm others.
Chapter 34: Isaiah Berlin - Two Concepts of Liberty
Overview of Isaiah Berlin
Life Span: 1909-1997
Role: Political philosopher renowned for defending individual liberty and value pluralism.
Concepts of Liberty
Negative Liberty
Definition: Freedom from interference by others; the absence of obstacles, barriers, or constraints on the individual.
Implication: The area where a person can act without hindrance is directly related to their freedom.
Positive Liberty
Definition: Freedom as self-mastery; the ability to be one's own master and control one's life.
Concern: This can lead to abuses by authorities asserting control over individuals under the guise of promoting their well-being.
Purpose of Liberty
Berlin emphasizes the necessity of individual freedom allowing people to make personal choices embodying their values.
Without the recognition of both negative and positive liberties, societies risk undermining personal autonomy.
Ethical Implications
The balance of personal liberty in relation to societal norms and laws is crucial.
Overreach into personal freedoms can lead to societal oppression disguised as moral obligation or societal good.
Mill’s and Berlin’s arguments contribute significantly to discussions about individual rights and the limits of governmental authority in personal conduct.