Professional Conduct
THE FOUR PILLARS
1. Autonomy Patients have the right to make their own decisions about their care. Your job is to inform, not control.
Requires informed consent
Applies to competent adults only
Includes the right to refuse treatment even if it causes death
2. Beneficence Your duty to act in the patient's best interest. Do good.
Always ask: what outcome genuinely helps this person most?
Sometimes conflicts with autonomy when patients make harmful choices
3. Non-maleficence Do no unnecessary harm.
Every intervention carries risk — the benefit must outweigh it
Includes physical, emotional, and psychological harm
4. Justice Fair and equal treatment for all patients.
Resources should be distributed fairly
No patient gets better or worse care based on race, religion, wealth, or status
Includes advocating for patients who face systemic barriers
THE MOST COMMON ETHICAL CONFLICTS
Autonomy vs Beneficence Patient wants something that isn't in their best interest. Example: patient refuses chemotherapy that could save their life → Respect autonomy if they are competent and informed
Autonomy vs Non-maleficence Patient's choice will cause them harm. Example: patient refuses insulin for diabetes → Ensure they understand consequences, then respect their decision if competent
Justice vs Beneficence Limited resources mean you can't give everyone everything. Example: one ICU bed, two critical patients → Allocate based on clinical need and likelihood of benefit, not personal characteristics
Confidentiality vs Duty to Protect Patient tells you something that puts others at risk. Example: patient with seizures refuses to stop driving → In Canada you have a legal duty to report this to authorities despite confidentiality
The key distinction: Passive refusal of treatment by a competent patient = respect autonomy Active self harm by a patient in crisis = intervene and protect
ALBERTA SPECIFIC LAWS AND REPORTING BODIES — MASTER REFERENCE
Who to report to:
Chief of Medicine — internal hospital issues, impaired colleagues, conflict of interest
Program Director — residency concerns, threats to your evaluation
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) — physician misconduct, professional violations
Alberta Health Services — reportable diseases like HIV, public health concerns
Alberta Transportation — seizure disorders in drivers
Child Protective Services — child safety concerns
Hospital Administration — institutional policy violations
Ethics Committee — complex ethical decisions needing team input
Key Alberta Laws:
Traffic Safety Act — mandatory reporting of seizure disorders in drivers
Public Health Act — mandatory reporting of HIV and other reportable diseases
Mature Minor Doctrine — no fixed age, capacity based assessment
MAiD legislation — patient must request themselves while competent, 18+
Key Concepts:
NETCARE — Alberta's prescription monitoring system
Disclosure — mandatory honest reporting of medical errors to patients
Conscientious objection — can refuse but must refer
Substitute decision making — next of kin decides based on what patient would have wanted