Global Risk Management
Global Risk Management Notes
Risk Management
Risk is defined as 'the variation from expected outcome over time' (Kallman, 2005).
It involves uncertain prediction about future behavior in a market or industry.
There's a possibility that the outcome could be detrimental to an organization.
The concept incorporates both opportunities and costs.
Risk management issues:
How to reduce risk exposure?
How to mitigate risks?
How to turn risks into opportunities.
Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) may have internal advantages, and becoming too risk-averse can be harmful to a firm’s success.
Risk in MNEs
Managers are affected by an inherent bounded rationality, i.e., making decisions that are satisfactory rather than optimal.
MNEs face uncertainty in complex internal and external environments.
Globalization of value chains (internal).
Deregulations of markets (external).
Risk management has to be a core competency of successful MNEs.
‘Cost-benefit’ analysis sometimes fails to take relevant risks into account.
Risks tend to be over-simplified, or one type of risk tends to be over-emphasized (e.g., exchange rates, inflation at the expense of the risk of political instability).
The type, magnitude, and impact of risks changes across geographical locations, industries, and firms.
Some business environments involve higher levels of risk than others.
Examples: High-technology industries, pharmaceutical industries, oil exploration.
Relationship Between Country Risks and FDI
This section likely contains a graph plotting overall risk score against FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) for various countries, though the specific data points aren't directly represented in the text. Some countries listed are USA, UK, France, Belgium, Hong Kong, Sweden, Germany, Singapore, Poland, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Mauritius, Panama, Brazil, China, Russia, India, Angola, Argentina, Nigeria, Lebanon, Sudan, Congo, Afghanistan, Guinea, Somalia, and Samoa.
Tools Governments Use to Promote FDI in High-Risk Environments
Tax reduction: Tax holiday, reduced tax rate, reduction in social security contributions, exemption from property taxes, income tax exemption, reductions for expatriate personnel
Imports and exports: Exemption of import duties and value-added taxes for raw material, capital equipment, exemption from export duties
Financial incentives: Subsidies, guaranteed loans, export credits, equity participation
Competitive incentives: Monopolistic position, preferential purchases, capacity regulation
Operational incentives:
Preferential rates – rents, land, power, telecoms
Assistance for market studies
Utilization of public services or government agencies
Secondment of personnel
Types of Risks
Country Risk
Political Risks: Asset destruction (war, riots), asset spoiling (expropriation), asset inflexibility (transfer, freeze). Employees’ exposure: targeted abuse, gangsterism, harassment. Stakeholders’ exposure: Market disruption, labor unrest, supplies shortage.
Economic Risks: Taxes, economic growth, inflation, costs of inputs, exchange rates.
Competitive Risks: Business logics (corruption, cartels, networks). Infrastructure (power, telecoms, transport). Regulations (nationalistic preferences, constraints on local capital, local content, local employment).
Operational Risks
Shareholders' Exposure
Managing Risk in Global Value Chains (GVCs)
Economic Risk
Nature: Systemic shifts in markets – new technologies and innovations, changing demand, financial disruptions, exchange rate fluctuations, and so on.
Causal effects on actors: Loss of competitive position in cost and/or market leadership; reduction in financial returns and profitability; lower income and structural volatility to localities and regions.
Recent examples: Decline of Canada's RIM (BlackBerry) and Finland's Nokia in smartphone devices, 2013.
Product Risk
Nature: Quality, safety, branding, and efficiency considerations
Causal effects on actors: Negative views of goods or services by consumers and customers; greater demand for corporate social responsibility.
Recent examples: The demise of Arthur Anderson LLP in 2002 because of its criminal involvement in the Enron fiasco; Toyota's quality issues with its 'sticky pedals' in the USA, 2009-11.
Regulatory Risk
Nature: Political, public-to-private governance, and changing standards and norms.
Causal effects on actors: Disruption or termination of global production, existing industrial practices, and organizational arrangements.
Recent examples: EU's tough regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) since 2003 and impact on GM crop-growers (e.g., Monsanto's MON810 maize).
Labour Risk
Nature: Struggles over working conditions and employment practices.
Causal effects on actors: Resistance and industrial action by employees; disruptions to global production and employment prospects; and potentially greater reputational risk.
Recent examples: Strikes in Foxconn's plants in China, maker of Apple's iPhones, owing to workers demanding for better terms and working conditions, 2012-13.
Environmental Risk
Nature: Natural hazards or human-made disasters.
Causal effects on actors: Accentuating the above four forms of risk and their causal effects.
Recent examples: Japan's 2011 Fukushima earthquake and production stoppage in automobile manufacturing owing to parts shortage.
Sources of Risk in a Supply Chain
Supply Risk
Process Risk
Demand Risk
Control Risk
Environmental Risk
Risk Fundamentals
A risk is an event that usually has a negative impact (it can create an opportunity as well) on tasks. In risk management, we try to know unknowns of future.
Three elements of risk:
The scenario (event)
Probability of occurrence
Size of impact
Risk in an event is calculated as:
Risk Levels (Types) and Probability
Types | Assessment | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
High | Is expected to occur, almost certain. | Greater than 80% |
Medium/High | Will probably occur, measures may or may not exist to reduce likelihood. | Between 20 and 80% |
Medium | Could occur, this is possible. | Between 10 and 20% |
Low/Medium | Measures to reduce likelihood exist, but may not be fully effective. | Between 5 and 10% |
Low | Might occur at some point in time. Conditions do exist for this to occur, but controls exist and are effective. | Less than 5% |
Rare | Rare, may occur in exceptional circumstances. No or little experience for a similar failure |
Risk Fundamentals Example
Risk levels and actions:
Low-Level Risks from 1 to 2: Accept
Moderate Risks from 3 to 5: Control
High-Level Risks from 6 to 9: Avoid
Risk Assessment Table:
Risks | Impact | Probability | P*I |
|---|---|---|---|
Extreme weather | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Cyber attacks | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Financial crises | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Terrorist attacks | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Spread of infectious virus | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Employment lawsuits | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Illicit trade | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Operational disruption | 1 | 3 | 3 |
IT breakdown | 2 | 3 | 6 |
P-I Matrix
This section visually represents risk assessment using a Probability-Impact matrix. The table maps different risks based on their probability and impact scores.
Risk Management Strategies
Four risk-management strategies and their implementation:
AVOIDANCE
Action taken before entry: Evaluate the consequences of entering – is a failure likely?
Action taken after entry: N/A
PREVENTION
Action taken before entry: Insulate against hostile forces. Negotiate with trustworthy parties. Build reputation.
Action taken after entry in response to a problem: Call up support previously pledged.
MITIGATION
Action taken before entry: Invest in rapid response measures. Take out insurance by sharing risks with partners.
Action taken after entry in response to a problem: Activate the pre-planned responsive measures.
WITHDRAWAL/ DIVESTMENT
Action taken before entry: Invest in liquid, mobile, flexible assets.
Action taken after entry in response to a problem: Sell, move, or transfer the vulnerable assets.
Criteria Relevant for Decision-Making
The ‘attractiveness’ of each option to the decision-maker.
The extent to which the firm is prepared to accept potential loss.
The estimated possibilities of success and failure.
The degree to which the decision-maker is likely to affect the success or failure.
So what steps to follow?
Clarify the risk involved – external environment vs. business.
Decide what to do
Retain the risk and prepare for eventualities.
Transfer the risk by switching to somebody else, diluting it, or insuring against it.
Regulate by investing to reduce it.
The Risk-Taking Organization
Characteristics that restrict risk-taking:
Centralized decision-making
Adherence to formal systems
A culture of caution
Early evaluation of new ideas
Mistakes being sanctioned too readily
Reliance on performance rewards based on pre-set plans
How can responsible risk-taking be encouraged?
Decentralization and informality
Projects that cut across firms
Rewarding staff and teams for new initiatives
Providing resources to develop new ideas
Encouraging and respecting learning
Trusting people