Rule of Law
Rule of Law
Vocabulary
Rule of Law
A fundamental constitutional principle requiring all individuals and institutions, including government, to be accountable under the law.
Key Concepts
Purpose of the Rule of Law
The Rule of Law seeks to reconcile:
Organised state power
Individual liberty
It provides a framework for legitimate government authority while protecting personal freedom.
Social Contract Theory
Thomas Hobbes
View
In the state of nature, life is insecure.
Individuals enter a social contract:
Surrender liberty
Accept absolute sovereign authority
Receive peace, security, and order in return
John Locke
View
Government is a fiduciary of the people.
Individuals retain significant autonomy and freedom.
State coercion should only be exercised when necessary.
Legal Positivism
Definition
Law is valid because it is created by recognised legal authorities.
Validity is independent of morality.
Key Requirements
Generality
Laws apply generally rather than arbitrarily.
Certainty
Laws should be predictable.
Stability
Laws should remain reasonably constant.
Accessibility
Laws must be publicly available and understandable.
Natural Law
Definition
Law is inherently connected to morality and justice.
Unjust laws may lack true legal legitimacy.
Proposition 1
The Rule of Law is a Fundamental Requirement of Civil Society
Society requires legal order and predictability.
Government power must be exercised according to law.
Proposition 2
The Rule of Law is a Substantive, Not Merely Procedural, Concept
Supporting Arguments
The Rule of Law includes substantive values such as:
Writ of habeas corpus
Security of property
Presumption of innocence
Freedom from discrimination
Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles
Joseph's View
A legal system emptied of moral content cannot distinguish between good and evil.
Totalitarian Regimes
Cannot genuinely claim adherence to the Rule of Law.
Otherwise the concept loses moral significance.
Historical Caution
Modern moral standards cannot always be imposed retrospectively on historical societies.
Criticisms
Joseph Raz
Warned against incorporating social justice.
Argued it strips the Rule of Law of independent meaning.
Sklar
Argued linking Rule of Law with social justice reduces it to political rhetoric or "ruling-class chatter."
Institutional vs Individual Morality
Morality of legal institutions may differ from personal morality.
Proposition 3
The Rule of Law is a Normative Concept Guiding Public Action
Ronald Dworkin
Described the Rule of Law as:
Aspirational
An ideal to be pursued
Sir Robin Cooke
The Rule of Law implies:
Representative democracy
Independent courts
Respect for Treaty principles
Critique
Lord Bingham
Described the Rule of Law as inherently ambiguous.
Parliamentary Silence
UK Parliament has never provided a statutory definition.
Similar position exists in New Zealand.
Counterargument
Rights instruments show that law operates according to normative values.
Examples include:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA)
NZBORA Rights Supporting the Rule of Law
Section 8
Right to life.
Section 9
Freedom from torture and cruel treatment.
Section 12
Right to participate in democratic processes.
Section 14
Freedom of expression.
Section 15
Freedom of religion.
Section 25(a)
Right to a fair trial.
Section 25(c)
Presumption of innocence.
Section 26
Freedom from retrospective criminal penalties.
Section 27(2)
Right of access to courts.
Proposition 4
The Rule of Law is a Supranational Concept
Transcends national borders.
Recognised through international legal instruments and democratic systems worldwide.
Proposition 5
The Rule of Law is the Foundational Norm of Western Constitutional Systems
Acts as the ultimate principle of legality.
Serves as the foundation upon which constitutional government is built.
Critiques of the Rule of Law
Certainty is Often Impossible
Corner House Research Case
Demonstrated that public decision-making inevitably involves:
Judgement
Choice
Discretion
Challenges claims that law always provides certainty.
Morse v Police
Illustrates the indeterminate nature of legal concepts and legal reasoning.
Positivist Critique
Legal positivists argue:
Moral content makes the Rule of Law incapable of precise definition.
A concept that means everything risks meaning nothing.
Rule of Law in New Zealand Legislation
The Rule of Law frequently appears without definition, leaving interpretation to the courts.
Examples
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Senior Courts Act 2016
Cases
Anufrijeva Case
Demonstrates how the Rule of Law shapes public policy.
Protects individual rights against arbitrary state action.
Corner House Research Case
Highlights the discretionary nature of governmental decision-making.
Morse v Police
Demonstrates uncertainty and flexibility within legal reasoning.
Fox Hunting Case
Hope J stated:
"The rule of law is the ultimate controlling factor on which our constitution is based."Establishes the Rule of Law as a foundational constitutional principle.
Bennett v Hawkesbury Road Magistrates Court
Bridge J stated:
"There is no principle more basic than the maintenance of the rule of law."Reinforces the central constitutional importance of the Rule of Law.
Relationship Between Rule of Law and Te Tiriti
Areas of Overlap
Protection against arbitrary government action.
Accountability of public authorities.
Recognition of substantive rights.
Crown obligations toward Māori.
Constitutional legitimacy.
Modern Constitutional Significance
Both the Rule of Law and Te Tiriti:
Shape judicial reasoning.
Influence public administration.
Guide constitutional interpretation.
Operate as foundational principles within New Zealand's constitutional framework.