Hypothesis Testing and Inferential Statistics
Part 2: Hypothesis Testing & Inferential Statistics Psychology 272 Spring 2025
Dedication
Dedicated to the memory of Dr. David O. Belcher (1957 - 2018)
Objectives
Understand various hypotheses: null hypothesis and research hypothesis
Distinguish between one-tailed and two-tailed tests, knowing when to use each
Recognize potential errors in hypothesis testing
Comprehend what is meant by statistical significance
Understand and calculate sampling distributions and standard error of the mean
Perform and interpret one-tailed and two-tailed z-tests and t-tests
Calculate confidence intervals
Explore assumptions behind z-tests and t-tests
Introduction
Emphasis on methodical thinking in hypothesis testing
Overview of logical progression in inferential statistics
Conceptual Framework
Hypothesis Testing: A systematic method used in inferential statistics to test assumptions (hypotheses) about a population based on sample data.
The Null Hypothesis and Research Hypothesis
The null hypothesis (H₀) posits no difference or effect - typically formulated as “There is no difference between…”
Statistical Notation: H₀: μ1 = μ2 (mean of group 1 equals mean of group 2)
The research hypothesis (H₁) is contrary to the null and reflects the researcher's prediction - posits there is a difference.
Statistical Notation: H₁: μ1 ≠ μ2 (mean of group 1 is not equal to mean of group 2)
Examples of Hypotheses
NCCPA Score Example:
Null hypothesis: H₀: "No difference between my NCCPA score (59.5) and the national average (55.6)."
Research hypothesis: H₁: "There is a difference between my NCCPA score and the national average."
IQ Test Example:
Null hypothesis: H₀: "Average IQ of my Psych 272 students is not significantly higher than WCU average (100)."
Research hypothesis: H₁: "Average IQ of my Psych 272 students is significantly higher than WCU average."
After-School Program Example:
Null hypothesis: H₀: "Children attending programs have the same IQ as those who do not."
Research hypothesis: H₁: "Children attending programs have higher IQs than those who do not."
Karl Popper's Principle of Falsification
Emphasizes that one cannot prove a hypothesis true, only falsifiable.
Propose an opposite hypothesis to what one believes to be true to disprove it.
Testing Hypotheses: The Logic of Hypothesis Testing
Steps in Hypothesis Testing
State the null hypothesis (H₀)
Test the null hypothesis: Collect data and conduct statistical tests.
Make a conclusion about H₀: Determine if H₀ is rejected or not.
Decision-making: Based on the conclusion, decide on the validity of the hypothesis.
Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Errors that can occur during testing of hypotheses include:
Type I Error (α): Rejecting a true null hypothesis (false positive).
Example: Incorrectly concluding treatment effects exist when they do not.
Type II Error (β): Failing to reject a false null hypothesis (false negative).
Example: Failing to find a significant treatment effect that is present.
Statistical Significance
Defined in terms of the probability of observing the results if the null hypothesis is true.
Common significance levels:
1.
α = .05 - 5% risk of Type I error - threshold to reject null hypothesis should be met or exceeded.A significant p-value (p < α) indicates a statistically significant difference.
Single-Sample Research
Single-group design compared to the population.
Minimum sample size suggested: 30 participants.
Types of single-sample inferential statistics:
z-test
t-test
chi-square goodness-of-fit test
z-Test
Used when population standard deviation (σ) is known to determine if a sample differs significantly from the population.
Formula for z-score:
Where\bar{X} is the sample mean; µ is the population mean.
Central Limit Theorem
States that the distribution of sample means approaches normality as sample size increases (N).
The standard error of the mean (SEM) is calculated as:
Conducting a One-Tailed z-Test
Construct hypotheses:
H₀: No difference in IQ.
H₁: Students in programs have higher IQ.
Critical values and areas of rejection:
Using p-value to determine if observed z > critical value
Decision based on results:
If observed z exceeds critical value, reject H₀.
Example of One-Tailed z-Test
Sample of 75 students; mean IQ = 103.5; population mean = 100; σ = 15.
Determine critical value for α = 0.05: critical z-value determined from z-table is 1.645.
Observed z value is 2.02:
Since 2.02 > 1.645, we reject H₀.
Conclude significant difference exists.
Conducting a Two-Tailed z-Test
No directionality specified, just determining if there is a difference.
Critical values determined for both lower and upper tails, e.g., ±1.96 for α = 0.05 when split (2.5% each tail).
Understanding Statistical Power
Power: Probability of correctly rejecting a false H₀.
Increased sample size can enhance power without raising Type I error risk.
Balancing α and β is essential in testing: lowering α increases β.
Confidence Intervals
A range that estimates the population mean (μ) within a specified confidence level (e.g., 95% or 99%).
Confidence Interval (CI) formula:
Where Z is the critical z-value for the CI level.
t-Test
Used when population standard deviation is unknown; t-distributions depend on sample size.
In calculations, t is not perfectly normal but approximates z as N increases.
The t-test formula:
Where s = sample standard deviation.
Degrees of Freedom (df)
Represent the number of independent values that can vary in a statistical calculation; for sample size N, df = N - 1.
Running a One-Sample t-Test
Set hypotheses:
H₀: μ ≤ μ₀ (population mean)
H₁: μ > μ₀ (expected to be higher)
Collect sample data (N = 10) and calculate t-value.
Determine critical t from t-table based on df and α.
Conclusion based on comparison of observed t with critical t-value.
Conclusion of the t-Test
Results indicates whether to reject or accept H₀.
SPSS Statistical Analysis
Instructions for conducting one-sample t-tests using SPSS.
Procedure includes selecting variables and specifying a population mean to test against.
References
Jackson, S.L. (2016). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.