Psychology 100: Learning & Memory

Psychology 100: Learning & Memory

Definition of Learning and Memory
  • Learning

    • Defined as a lasting change in behavior resulting from experience.

  • Memory

    • Consists of information that is encoded and stored in the brain resulting from a learning experience.

    • Not visible externally; inferred through observable behavioral changes following experiences.

Who Can Learn & Remember?
  • The nervous systems exhibit plasticity, implying that changes can occur in response to experiences.

Multiple Kinds of Learning
  • Types of Learning:

    • Simple Associations (e.g., responding to commands like "Sit!")

    • Motor Skills (e.g., complex actions)

    • Complex Skills (e.g., classical & operant conditioning)

    • Cognitive Skills

Classical Conditioning

Overview
  • Also known as Pavlovian Conditioning.

Ivan Pavlov
  • A Russian physiologist recognised for studying the digestive processes.

  • Nobel Prize: Won in 1904 for his discoveries that contributed to the study of conditioned reflexes and behavior associations in the brain.

  • Developed a series of laboratory instruments, including:

    • Saliva collection chamber

    • Response recording device

    • Food container

    • Saliva collection tube

    • Observation screen

Key Terms in Classical Conditioning
  1. Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS): Stimulus that naturally and automatically triggers a response (e.g., presentation of food).

  2. Unconditioned Response (UCR): The unlearned response that occurs naturally in reaction to the UCS (e.g., salivation in response to food).

Conditioning Process
  • Phase 1 (Before Conditioning)

    • Presentation of food (UCS) triggers the salivation response (UCR).

  • Phase 2 (During Conditioning)

    • Pairing a neutral stimulus with UCS leads to feelings of hunger, autonomic reflexes, hormone release.

  • After Conditioning:

    • Conditioned Stimulus (CS): Previously neutral stimulus (like a bell) that starts to trigger a learned response, now called the Conditioned Response (CR).

    • Example: The bell gains meaning, prompting salivation in anticipation of food.

Higher-Order Classical Conditioning
  • Chaining Associations Together: Enables more complex associations through further pairings with CS.

    • Example structure:

    • PHASE #1: Presentation of food (UCS) + Conditioned Stimulus (CS1)

    • PHASE #2: CS1 is now referred to as CS2, creating a second-order association.

Extinction of Conditioned Responses
  • A conditioned response will extinguish if the conditioned stimulus is no longer paired with the unconditioned stimulus.

  • Strength of CR (e.g., amount of saliva decreases) will drop over trials where no pairings occur.

Real-World Applications of Classical Conditioning
  • Acquired 'likes' and 'dislikes': Preferences to tastes, smells, situations, etc.

  • Emotional reactions: Learned fears, anxieties, joys, disgust, etc.

  • Automatic thinking patterns may develop biases and stereotypes related to stimuli associated with emotions.

The Case of “Little Albert”
  • An experiment by Watson & Rayner (1920) exploring conditioned emotional reactions.

  • Process outlined:

    • Before Conditioning: Exposure to a white rat (neutral stimulus).

    • During Conditioning: Paired white rat with a loud noise (UCS), provoking fear (UCR).

    • After Conditioning: White rat (CS) elicits a conditioned fear response (CR) involving behavioral, emotional, physiological, and hormonal reactions.

Operant Conditioning

Overview
  • Also referred to as Instrumental Conditioning.

Edward Thorndike
  • Pioneer in educational psychology.

- Studied learning processes using trials with "puzzle boxes" to observe behavior.
Law of Effect:
  • States that organisms learn from the consequences of their actions.

  • Behaviors leading to good outcomes are repeated, while those leading to bad outcomes are avoided.

Thorndike’s Puzzle Boxes
  • Design where cats had to perform specific actions (like pressing a pedal) to escape and receive food as a reward.

  • Demonstrates trial-and-error learning.

Learning Curve
  • Illustrates how trial-and-error learning improves efficiency over time, characterized by a gradual increase in successful behaviors.

The “Law of Effect” Visual
  • Likelihood of Behavior Repeating:

    • If something rewarding follows behavior, it increases likelihood.

    • If something punishing follows behavior, it decreases likelihood.

B.F. Skinner and Operant Conditioning
  • Defined an operant as a voluntary behavior that acts upon the environment.

  • Used the Skinner Box to study reinforcement.

    • Contains features like a food pellet dispenser, lever for bar pressing (operant), and environmental controls.

Reinforcement
  • Reinforcement leads to increased behavioral responses:

    • Positive Reinforcement: Receiving something desirable post-behavior (e.g., food).

    • Negative Reinforcement: Removal of something undesirable post-behavior (e.g., escape from confinement).

Types of Reinforcement
  1. Primary Reinforcers: Require no prior experience for value (e.g., food, water).

  2. Secondary Reinforcers: Acquire value through classical conditioning linked with primary reinforcers (e.g., money, praise).

Neurobiology of Reinforcement
  • Dopamine: Critical to reinforcement processes, particularly in the nucleus accumbens (the brain's reward center).

  • Involvement of brain structures:

    • Hypothalamus: Regulates life-sustaining drives and links to the endocrine system.

    • Hippocampus: Involved in memory formation.

    • Amygdala: Plays a role in emotion and threat response.

Punishment
  • Leads to a decrease in behavioral responses:

    • Positive Punishment: Introduction of an aversive stimulus post-behavior (e.g., physical punishment).

    • Negative Punishment: Removal of a pleasant stimulus post-behavior (e.g., taking away privileges).

Extinction in Operant Conditioning
  • Previously reinforced behaviors can extinguish if reinforcement is withdrawn.

B.F. Skinner’s Insights on Reinforcement
  • Emphasizes that the execution style of positive reinforcement is more crucial than the amount of reinforcement provided.

Schedules of Reinforcement
  • Details on how reinforcement is generally not provided continuously, rather through ratio or interval schedules, impacting behavior response rates.

Types of Schedules
  1. Fixed Interval Schedule: Provides reinforcement after a set time.

    • Example: Payroll periods, studying habits, which can lead to varying response patterns.

  2. Variable Interval Schedule: Rewards at unpredictable times.

    • Example: Checking social media or email, leading to steady, frequent responding.

  3. Fixed Ratio Schedule: Reinforcement after a specific number of responses.

    • Example: Loyalty cards or commission-based earnings.

  4. Variable Ratio Schedule: Unpredictable reinforcement after an average number of responses.

    • Example: Gambling behavior and how it leads to persistent responding.

Extinction Susceptibility Summary
  • Likelihood of extinction varies with the reinforcement schedule used.

    • Continuous: Very easy to extinguish.

    • Fixed/Variable Interval: Relatively easy to extinguish.

    • Variable Ratio: Very difficult to extinguish due to unpredictability.

Behaviorism’s “Black Box” Concept
  • Emphasizes that internal mental states (e.g., thoughts and feelings) are not observable.

  • Behaviorism primarily focuses on observable behaviors and the stimuli-response mechanisms rather than the cognitive processes.

Cognition & Learning

Learning By Observing
  • Vicarious Learning: Learning that occurs through observing consequences of another’s actions (Bandura, 1961).

    • Example: The “Bobo Doll” experiment.

Learning Without Reinforcement
  • Explored by Edward Tolman, known for his concept of Cognitive Maps.

Tolman’s Cognitive Maps Experiment
  • Different groups explored mazes under varying conditions of food reinforcement to demonstrate latent learning, revealing the unobserved learning potential without immediate reinforcement.

Psychology's Cognitive Revolution
  • Marked by a shift towards understanding internal processes and their role in learning, rather than just focusing on observable behaviors.