unit 3 day 1
U.S. Expansion and Manifest Destiny
Overview of Land Ownership
- By 1860, approximately 20,000,000 acres of federal land were available.
- Majority private but interspersed with public land.
Global Context: European Imperialism
- European powers, particularly Britain, are entering an era of imperialism.
- Focus on expanding their territories and trade outside Europe.
- Key events include the Prussian Franco War and revolutions in France (1848).
- The Ottoman Empire, referred to as the "Sikmian Empire," is viewed as a target for trade relationships by the British.
- The American perspective on imperialism: the U.S. is more focused on acquiring land in North America than pursuing imperial ambitions abroad.
- Land desired includes territories owned by Mexico.
Philosophy of Manifest Destiny
- The term "Manifest Destiny" was coined by John L. O. Sullivan in 1845.
- It reflects the belief that Americans (particularly white Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are destined to expand westward and spread democracy.
- This ideology mirrors British sentiments about their own superiority.
- Both abolitionists and non-abolitionists supported westward expansion due to Manifest Destiny.
- Slave owners significantly influenced the push for land due to economic motivations tied to slave labor.
- Misconceptions about westward expansion being primarily driven by slave owners are countered by recognizing broader American sentiments for land ownership and expansionist duty.
Texas and American Expansion
- Historical Context: John Quincy Adams recognized New Spain via the Adams-Onís Treaty (1819) while Mexico sought independence from Spanish rule.
- Mexico gained independence in 1821.
- Initially, Mexico encouraged American settlers to inhabit its territories, leading to land grants aimed at fostering settlement.
- Early settlers in Texas included the Austin family (Moses and Stephen F. Austin), who accepted Mexican regulations.
- Conflict arises due to Mexico outlawing slavery in 1827 while exempting American settlers.'
- Many of these settlers were from southern states, desire for cotton plantation land.
- By 1835, the demographics in Texas included:
- 27,000 Americans
- 3,000 enslaved individuals
- 3,000 Mexicans
- Emergence of two groups: the "Peace Party" and the "War Party" (the latter primarily composed of slave owners).
Conflict in Texas
- Mexican President Santa Anna's revocation of exemptions regarding slavery incited rebellion on March 2, 1836.
- Texans sought independence, emphasizing the right to maintain enslaved labor in Texas.
- The Battle of the Alamo became a defining moment in the struggle for Texan independence, romanticized by the media.
- Popular figures included:
- Davy Crockett: Frontiersman and folk hero associated with American ideals and heroism.
- Jim Bowie: Renowned for creating the Bowie knife, celebrated as an American icon.
- The aftermath of the Alamo, characterized by heavy media coverage, heightened support for Texan rebellion.
- Following their victory at the Battle of San Jacinto in April 1836, Texans achieved de facto independence; however, Mexico did not acknowledge this independence.
Political Dynamics: Martin Van Buren and Texas Annexation
- Martin Van Buren, a complex political figure, refused to annex Texas for two reasons:
- Reluctance to engage in a war with Mexico over territory.
- His political stance as a "Free Soiler" led him to oppose the expansion of slavery into new states.
- His refusal to annex Texas led to political repercussions, limiting his congressional prospects.
The Oregon Trail and Westward Movement
- The boundaries between the U.S. and Canada remain uncertain around the Oregon Territory.
- The Oregon Trail spurs a mass migration beginning around 1842, termed "Oregon Fever."
- Difficulties faced by settlers:
- By 1860, 2,500 trailblazers took the Oregon Trail, with approximately 65,000 intending to settle, and a significant death toll of 34,000 due to environmental hardships.
- Notable tragedies such as the Donner Party highlight the perils along the trail in 1846.
Gold Rush and California Expansion
- The discovery of gold in California in 1848 spurs a mass influx of miners in 1849, referred to as the "49ers."
- California's prospective statehood is galvanized by the Gold Rush and the influx of prospectors.
Political Landscape Post-Gold Rush
- The election of 1848 shifts focus to westward expansion and its implications for slavery.
- Controversies surrounding slavery of expansion are evident.
- William Henry Harrison's presidency shifts to John Tyler due to Harrison's death.
- Tyler is viewed skeptically by both Whigs and Democrats.
Presidential Expansionism: James K. Polk
- James K. Polk emerges as an ardent advocate for territorial expansion, including Texas and parts of Mexico.
- Employs a joint resolution to annex Texas as the 28th state (1849), bypassing traditional treaty ratification requirements.
- Polk attempts to purchase additional land from Mexico but faces rejection, prompting him to pursue war as a means of acquiring territory.
Mexican-American War
- Polk sends troops to areas claimed by both America and Mexico to provoke a response, which leads to war.
- The U.S. reaches an agreement with Britain regarding the Oregon territory (49th parallel) to avoid interference in the conflict with Mexico.
- General Winfield Scott orchestrates successful campaigns leading to U.S. victory.
- The war culminates in territorial acquisition of California, New Mexico, Utah, and parts of modern-day Colorado.
Moral Opposition: The Conscience Whigs and Wilmot Proviso
- Following the Mexican-American War, a faction known as the Conscience Whigs emerges, opposing the war on moral grounds, particularly regarding the expansion of slavery.
- David Wilmot, a Pennsylvanian Democrat, proposes the Wilmot Proviso, intending to prevent slavery in newly acquired territories:
- It passes the House but fails in the Senate due to an evenly divided representation.
- Movement toward a regional ideology regarding slavery becomes increasingly prominent, transcending traditional party lines.
The Free Soil Movement
- The Free Soil movement emerges, prioritizing economic concerns over moral ones in their stance against slavery's expansion.
- They advocate limiting slavery instead of direct abolition, with the belief that it economically disadvantages other classes.
- Frederick Douglass and others see potential in forming coalitions between Free Soilers and abolitionists for greater impact against slavery.
Conclusion
- The interactions between American ideology, territorial ambitions, and the complex social and ethical implications surrounding slavery set the stage for significant national tension leading to the Civil War.
- Political maneuvering and alliances in this period foreshadow the conflicts to arise in the 1850s and 1860s regarding slavery and statehood.